On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:50:19AM +0200, Adrian Snyman wrote:
Okay, It just happened again .. It seems as though the acl file gets corrupted
I have attached an example ...
You didn't gzip it like I asked, so I'm not entirely sure it hasn't been
corrupted when I receive it, but what I see is
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:08, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Hrvoje Habjanić writes:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 12:46, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[...]
Because I've yet to see a logical explanation why authlib needs to know
this. authlib's purpose is to verify account passwords. That's it.
The
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 07:32, Adrian Snyman wrote:
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 21:48, Brian Candler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:29:41AM +0200, Adrian Snyman wrote:
We have migrated the majority of our users (250) onto
a single mailserver with postfix/courier-imap
Version of
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:08:42PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
BUT there then should be some kind of mechanism to limit/deny specific
user based on IP address (and maybe some other criteria).
If you start chasing every kind of marginal situation that someone dreams
up, thing will quickly
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:48:08AM +, Benji Booble wrote:
I have a problem with some of the Outlook 2003 users that access the
POP3d-ssl. I only have 2 users using it, everyone else used imapd-ssl
without issue.
We use CACert.org certificates (www.cacert.org) which appear self signed.
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:48:23AM +0200, Adrian Snyman wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24971922
I missed that in the archive, sorry.
Since this is a file corruption issue, it would be worth describing your
storage: e.g. what type of disks, what type of filesystem,
On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:16, Brian Candler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:48:23AM +0200, Adrian Snyman wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24971922
I missed that in the archive, sorry.
Hey, no problem .. :)
I do believe that it is the storage subsystem ..
We
On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:52, Adrian Snyman wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:16, Brian Candler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:48:23AM +0200, Adrian Snyman wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24971922
I missed that in the archive, sorry.
Hey, no problem
Adrian Snyman writes:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 09:34, Brian Candler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:50:19AM +0200, Adrian Snyman wrote:
Okay, It just happened again .. It seems as though the acl file gets
corrupted I have attached an example ...
You didn't gzip it like I asked, so I'm not
Hi all,
Firstly, may I apologise for the crosspost. I can't determine whether
this is an issue with Squirrelmail or with Courier IMAP. I hope
somebody can shed some light on it. We are using courier-imap 4.1.1,
with squirrelmail 1.4.6.
I'm seeing the following in squirrelmail with server-side
Hi
I do experience some kind of slowness in IMAP...
I see that usually PERMANENTFLAGS is set to Limited
Here it is set to
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] No permanent flags permitted
Could this be a reason for slowing down ?
How can I modify it and why ? I've been googling around about this but
didn't
Jay, Brian,
Okay, thanks very much for the information. Now I can stop
chasing one imaginary bunny and start chasing a real one! :)
Based on other things that I've read, I'm assuming that both sqwebmail
and squirrelmail have the password change functionality.
Thanks again for the help!
TonyOn
On Thu, July 6, 2006 11:42 am, Tony Stocker wrote:
Okay, thanks very much for the information. Now I can stop chasing one
imaginary bunny and start chasing a real one! :) Based on other things
that I've read, I'm assuming that both sqwebmail and squirrelmail have the
password change
Hi,
It’s possible to configure Courier-Imap
to send an SMS when there’s a new mail in the box?
Thanks,
Renato
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.9/382 - Release Date: 04-07-2006
Using Tomcat but
Alle 18:53, giovedì 6 luglio 2006, Renato Santos ha scritto:
It’s possible to configure Courier-Imap to send an SMS when there’s a
new mail in the box?
maybe it's about the MTA, not the imap server...
Paz, R.
--
Roberto Polli
Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it
Tel. +39.06.91801075 - fax
On Thu, July 6, 2006 12:53 pm, Renato Santos wrote:
Its possible to configure Courier-Imap to send an SMS when theres a
new mail in the box?
No, Courier-IMAP is responsible for checking the mail when the user logs
in, it doesn't do anything at delivery time. That's a job for your Local
Maildrop can trigger actions when mail is delivered.
Regards
El Jueves, 6 de Julio de 2006 13:53, Renato Santos escribió:
Hi,
It’s possible to configure Courier-Imap to send an SMS when there’s a
new mail in the box?
Thanks,
Renato
--
En un mundo sin fronteras ¿Quién necesita
Jay,
I've got a fairly small user set, but 1.) there's a lot of travel
involved for some, 2.) there's a desire to have the ability to check
mail from home and work and not worry about folder/message sync
problems, and 3.) we've got new security requirements being implemented
on us. This is why I
18 matches
Mail list logo
