On 7/24/2008, Giuliano Gavazzi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Well, presumably you haven't used Mail.app on MacOS.
Your presumption would be wrong... my Mom has had a Mac since forever,
and I'm her tech guy. We had a lot of problems for a long time trying to
get her comfortably using IMAP... she f
On F 18 Jul, 2008, at 15:19 , Simon wrote:
> I think TBird rocks... it ain't perfect, no... my biggest gripe is the
> lack of a proper signature manager, and a few other minor gripes
> (rewrapping quotes in replies, Quote only selected text, etc), but
> honestly, with the right extensions and JS
On 7/18/2008, Sam Varshavchik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Actually, it's just bad GUI.
Arguable that it is 'bad' gui though...
Maybe its just the gui designers way to easily give the user the option
of attaching a link or the actual file...
It should be documented though...
-
On 7/18/2008, Sam Varshavchik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Actually, it's just bad GUI. If you drop a file into the message
> pane, in creates a link in the message text. If you drop a file into
> the top area where all the addresses are, it loads the file into an
> attachment. When you drag the fi
Simon writes:
On 7/17/2008 5:36 PM, Enda wrote:
I don't know that thunderbird has IMAP issues, but it sure has
usability issues for users I put into it. Simple things that work so
well in other clients like dragging a file into a composition window
creating a local link to a file instead of a
On 7/17/2008 5:36 PM, Enda wrote:
> I don't know that thunderbird has IMAP issues, but it sure has
> usability issues for users I put into it. Simple things that work so
> well in other clients like dragging a file into a composition window
> creating a local link to a file instead of attaching
Jay Lee wrote:
> What issues have you had with Thunderbird? We have hundreds of TB
> clients connecting without IMAP issues. Maybe you should describe your
> problems here... You seem to be having issues with large mailboxes but
> you don't define what "humongous" is (1,000 messages? 10,000? 100
Jay and Simon, thanks for your replies. I was brought to think that
Thunderbird had problems by some messages on this list, from May IIRC.
We have had problems in the past on some machines using Thunderbird,
but that was with old machines (and we use SSL that is no lighweight).
We have no re
Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
Hello all, sorry for the partially OT question, but we are having
problems for some client machines using Outlook Express 6 for Windows.
I have read of problems with Thurderbird too, so I am looking for a
functional MUA, graphical, that works well with Courier (and ot
On 7/16/2008, Giuliano Gavazzi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have read of problems with Thurderbird too, so I am looking for a
> functional MUA, graphical, that works well with Courier (and other
> IMAP servers I suppose!).
Thunderbird works very well for our 55+ workstations here...
What ki
Hello all, sorry for the partially OT question, but we are having
problems for some client machines using Outlook Express 6 for Windows.
I have read of problems with Thurderbird too, so I am looking for a
functional MUA, graphical, that works well with Courier (and other
IMAP servers I supp
11 matches
Mail list logo
