On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 08:47 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 08:41 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >
> > I don't think this is quite correct either. rsync operates at a file
> > level and should NOT move messages from new to cur. The distinction
> > should specify that a
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 08:41 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I don't think this is quite correct either. rsync operates at a file
> level and should NOT move messages from new to cur. The distinction
> should specify that a "mail retrieval agent" operating directly on a
> Maildir MUST (not MAY)
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 11:40 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> However, the sentence became obviously false after that change. So I also
> alleviated the duty of a maildir reader by s/moves/may move/. The sentence
> now
> reads:
>
> When a maildir reading process finds messages in the
On Sun 24/Jul/2016 00:12:34 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 13:29 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> In this case, I think that "MUA" simply means "the process that's
>>> reading the mail dir." In particular, it refers to Dovecot in the
>>> same
