Trev wrote:
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A client (Courier in this case) SHOULD treat a 552 error after a RCPT TO
command as 452. But the text says SHOULD and not MUST.
I think it would be desirable for Courier to implement the RFC's
suggestion, and treat a RCPT TO
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure Courier is getting the 552 error *imeadiatly after* RCPT
TO. I can't be sure from the mail delivery status message I'm getting.
You can tell by counting the bounces. If all N recipients bounce,
the 552 was presumably a response to the DATA
Trev wrote:
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a
[552]
error on the 21st recipient and beyond, not a 4xx.
552 after RCPT TO is a special case: it is actually a 4yz temporary
error response, even though it starts with a 5! (It was defined this
way to
Rodrigo Severo writes:
A client (Courier in this case) SHOULD treat a 552 error after a RCPT TO
command as 452. But the text says SHOULD and not MUST. Is this the
reason Courier doesn't treat a 552 error as 452 after RCPT TO? Or does it?
Courier treats all 5xx errors the same. Courier
Trev wrote:
Is this not what you are experiencing?
Just to clarify, I am getting:
552 elnbsbsrv44: your message counts in one session of 59 exceeds maximum
setting 20
Rodrigo Severo
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better
Trev wrote:
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem I'm trying to solve is that one domain to which I got to
send several messages recently changed their settings and now have an
upper limit of 20 RCPTs per message.
I don't think you should need to do anything. I think
Rodrigo Severo writes:
Trev wrote:
Is this not what you are experiencing?
Just to clarify, I am getting:
552 elnbsbsrv44: your message counts in one session of 59 exceeds maximum
setting 20
The recipient's mail server is run by an idiot.
This is not your problem.
If someone programmed
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a
[552]
error on the 21st recipient and beyond, not a 4xx.
552 after RCPT TO is a special case: it is actually a 4yz temporary
error response, even though it starts with a 5! (It was defined this
way to reduce problems caused by a small
Hello Ricky,
(Please do not Cc me, I am on the list if I write here)
Am 2005-03-17 14:15:08, schrieb Ricky Chan:
What I want is to split my $USER by country...
I think I got what you mean, you basically want a single name for
IMAP/POP3 connections, which then depending on the user will
Am 2005-03-16 10:01:39, schrieb Martijn Lievaart:
Running courier for a five user setup on an old P90 I cannot really
comment on multi thousend user setups, but I must second this based on
years of experince with different mail setups. On any serious IMAP
server, you need fast I/O
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 12:22, Martijn Lievaart wrote:
I run reiser for a newsspool and it performs OK. However I had lots of
trouble in the past with reiser, so after reading this account let me
retract my reiser recommendation. Ext3 should be fine, but for maximum
performance one should
Anand Buddhdev writes:
Carlos Hanson wrote:
Formerly posted on the courier-sqwebmail list:
Greetings,
After setting up sqwebmail and logging into my account, in the upper
right-hand corner I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Naturally, when I send an email through
From: Sam Varshavchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bowie Bailey writes:
I'm not sure why I am seeing these messages from some mail
servers:
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not
resolve
I've got MX and A records, what else do I need?
Nothing.
Gerardo Gregory writes:
Been tasked with setting up a virtualdomain that is private for internal
corporate communication.
Currently I have Courier-MTA, maildrop for local delivery, PAM auth, and
some virtul domains already setup using userdb.
The domain I am asked to setup needs to only be
Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's nothing a mail server can do to physically prevent a given mail
client from using any return address. The theoretically closest that
comes to that is requiring all mail clients to use authentication, and
restricting the From: header to match
Lars Holmstrm writes:
# testmxlookup skyitl.se
Domain skyitl.se:
Relay: mail1.skyitl.se, Priority: 180, Address: :::172.24.99.31
Relay: mail1.skyitl.se, Priority: 200, Address: :::172.24.99.31
# more /etc/courier/esmtproutes
skyitl.se: 172.24.99.31
mail.skyitl.se: 172.24.99.31
I can not
Ok, I change the addresses to include brackets and will try to see if it
works OK.
The reason you got different results than what I sent in my mail is that the
mailserver use another DNS, that you can not reach. This is also the reason
the addresses are not routed over internet.
/Lars
Jeff Jansen
Sam, True, I do not need an static entry. This is a misunderstanding from my
point of view. Now it is some what more clear. Thanks.
/Lars
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Lars Holmström writes:
# testmxlookup skyitl.se
Domain skyitl.se:
Relay: mail1.skyitl.se, Priority: 180, Address: :::172.24.99.31
Jan Stanik writes:
Hi,
sometimes when I add domain into hosteddomains (and run
makehosteddomains), courier ignores it and delivers test
message to the next mx server through smtp. Only what helps is stop and
start courier. After restart mails are delivered correctly to
Nathan Fiedler writes:
When I try to send mail to myself on the same machine (that is, mail
nfiedler, the maillog shows:
May 21 10:38:56 nuts courieresmtp:
id=4802.3CEA862F.08EB,from=#@[],addr=nfiedler@nuts: No such
domain.
I have tried putting nuts and localhost in both
Tom Price writes:
May 14 08:39:01 newmail courieresmtpd:
error,relay=192.168.137.116,from=tomp@ne
wmail.howardkennedy.com,to=tomp: 513 Syntax error.
And a failure message from the MTA returned to me as well.
I am sure that there must be a way of configuring courier to accept
that
Rodney Smith writes:
When I run webmail, it seems to avoid the 'me' configuration file and call
gethostname, so users are user@dhcp-xxx-xx instead of the domain name. Did I
miss a configuration option somewhere?
You want to set the defaultdomain configuration file.
--
Sam
Jeffrey Iskandar Ahmad writes:
log file from database
--
334 Query select pw_name, pw_passwd, pw_uid, pw_gid, pw_gecos,
pw_dir, pw_shell , pw_clear_passwd from vpopmail where pw_name
= japloe and pw_domain = freemail.time.net.my
Your help really2 appreciated.
Dan Yost writes:
However, I service many clients with many machines that have very limited
connectivity, and the bottom line is that I cannot request that they be
reconfigured to set fully-qualified machine names.
That's the same argument used by Microsoft: it's too inconvenient for us to
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Dan Yost writes:
However, I service many clients with many machines that have very limited
connectivity, and the bottom line is that I cannot request that they be
reconfigured to set fully-qualified machine names.
That's the same argument
--On Wednesday, January 23, 2002 18:13:41 -0500 Sam Varshavchik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gottschalk writes:
Hi All,
I am having a problem with the logindomainlist. I have entered
several domains in logindomainlist because I am hosting about 10
virtual domains right now. What
At 12/31/01 12:01 PM, Nick Riemondi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, thank all of you immensely for your help. I have actually
created my own problem and it brings up a general set up issue for virtual
domains.
I'm hosting many, many domains... and I need to keep them seperate because
27 matches
Mail list logo
