On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Malcolm Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which leads to the inevitable observation that there are no prizes for
conformance to the RFC, but there are for getting the job done. The
job of a mail transfer agent is to transfer mail. Not pass a
Jon Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Malcolm Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which leads to the inevitable observation that there are no prizes for
conformance to the RFC, but there are for getting the job done. The
job of a mail transfer agent is to transfer mail. Not
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 09:46, Jon Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Malcolm Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which leads to the inevitable observation that there are no prizes for
conformance to the RFC, but there are for getting the job done. The
job of a mail
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:15:23 +0200
Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Malcolm Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which leads to the inevitable observation that there are no prizes
for conformance to the RFC, but there are for getting the job done.
The job of a mail transfer agent is to
-Original Message-
From: dick hoogendijk
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:44 AM
[ Snip ]
My 2 ct: I agree fully to the compliance rules of courier. Why? 'cause I
see everyday waht non-compiance does on the web (www). And I hate it. If
I would want a MTA that was more
-Original Message-
From: Julian Mehnle
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:34 AM
Malcolm Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If these standards are open to interpretation then there will be
discrepancies between the MTAs.
And that would be a problem... why?
Where did you
