Jan Ingvoldstad writes:
Adding support for a new, optional record type is always a hassle. Supporting
the TXT record that SPF was designed for in the first place is easy, no
changes are needed.
Also, the rationale for having a SPF record type was very weak in itself.
When it was
On 23.08.13 14:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The spec was buggy on what type servers should look up, and querying
both --which is what Courier does-- is a waste of resources. Skipping
an unnecessary query seems to be rather an acknowledgment that type 99
never flew, than a step backward.
On Tue
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
I still see no sane reason for removing SPF record from DNS.
Adding support for a new, optional record type is always a hassle.
Supporting the TXT record that SPF was designed for in the first place is
easy, no
On 20.08.13 19:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
BTW, 4408bis just entered Last Call. There are not many differences,
but it seems to be a good occasion to review SPF implementations.
On Wed 21/Aug/2013 11:35:17 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
oh, hell. again that people have not started
On Tue 03/Sep/2013 17:41:41 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 23.08.13 14:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The spec was buggy on what type servers should look up, and querying
both --which is what Courier does-- is a waste of resources. Skipping
an unnecessary query seems to be rather an
Alessandro Vesely writes:
See also http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry
Even when I'm cold drunk, I could never come up with something like this.
pgpdFSuteY8im.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Sorry for the delay, I was in a badly connected place.
On Wed 21/Aug/2013 11:35:17 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 20.08.13 19:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
BTW, 4408bis just entered Last Call. There are not many differences,
but it seems to be a good occasion to review SPF
On Tue 20/Aug/2013 01:33:34 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I agree that in this situation, 'none' would be the more technically
proper result. This will be changed.
On 20.08.13 19:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
BTW, 4408bis just entered Last Call. There are not many differences,
but it seems to be
On Tue 20/Aug/2013 01:33:34 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I agree that in this situation, 'none' would be the more technically
proper result. This will be changed.
BTW, 4408bis just entered Last Call. There are not many differences,
but it seems to be a good occasion to review SPF
I may have a configuration issue as a result of an upgrade that I am not
understanding fully..
I am not getting any mail into my IMAP mail box, though I can successfully
now manage it with my iPhone (move mail around, delete it, etc)
So watching the messages log, I see mail from my work be
Nick Ellson writes:
I may have a configuration issue as a result of an upgrade that I am not
understanding fully..
I am not getting any mail into my IMAP mail box, though I can successfully
now manage it with my iPhone (move mail around, delete it, etc)
So watching the messages log, I
11 matches
Mail list logo
