On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Peter Flanigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you suggest?
I know that you feel strongly about these NA reports, but my personal
view is that while having them may be annoying if your goal is
perfection from CPAN Testers, the reality is that it really means
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:18:53PM +0100, Peter Flanigan wrote:
I have these three NAs;
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1811561
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1811557
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1811555
which do not appear to offer an
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:09:34PM +0100, Peter Flanigan wrote:
I was assuming that chris is a PAUSE id and obtained the email address
from the authors page on CPAN. I tried typing chris and CHRIS into the
textfield on that page and clicking the SEARCH button, but I received a
completely
Hi. In chasing a bug flushed out on my smoker, Peter Flanigan
temporarily added an exit 0 to Makefile.PL if @INC matched my
particular unique path to perl.
That's obviously a quick hack, but in subsequent discussion, he asked
whether it would be possible to put the tester's ID in an environment
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:06:11AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
* Is flagging tester in an environment variable a good idea? Bad idea?
Is this so the author can specifically target a tester who they don't
wish to test their distribution? If this is because of a bug, and the
bug gets fixed, that
David Golden wrote:
Hi. In chasing a bug flushed out on my smoker, Peter Flanigan
temporarily added an exit 0 to Makefile.PL if @INC matched my
particular unique path to perl.
That's obviously a quick hack, but in subsequent discussion, he asked
whether it would be possible to put the
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:47 PM, David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the plus side, it makes it easier to see who sent a report in the
NNTP web interface when the From line is obscured.
Do test reports include a link to Barbie's NNTP de-obfuscator yet?
At least CPAN::Reporter reports
