At 08:03 PM 04/03/2001 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
So, do the participants of this list wish to actually get something done
with regard to securing privacy, or shall we just spin our wheels in
internecine warfare?
Well, we *could* act like good Libertarian party member and
go for the
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 08:03:22PM -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Declan and Jim both seemed to have missed the point about Cypherpunks. I've
attended physical meetings, off and on, since meeting #2 or #3 in the Bay
Area.
It's a fair point, and I don't think I missed it. In any case,
I don't
Choate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CDR: RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk?
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 08:03:22PM -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Declan and Jim both seemed to have missed the point about
Cypherpunks. I've
attended physical meetings, off and on, since meeting #2
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Jim most certainly did miss my point. I said, in essence, that we are doing
the anti-privacy crowd's a service when we argue among ourselves. Jim's
still arguing left vs. right vs. libertarian vs. whatever. Get with the
program, Jim.
No Sandy,
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Declan is a gentleman and a scholar. Now if only we could get...others to
demonstrate the same sort of wisdom. :-D
Translation from spin doctor bullshit into regular english:
I like Declan because he agrees with me.
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
That the populate in general will find a way to resolve the disparities
and problems by simple understanding and toleration.
Has anyone ever done a study - a worthwhile, entertaining, informative,
cautionary study - of rhetoric employed by
