Re: CDR: RE: Recording conversations and the laws of men

2001-04-30 Thread measl
Police officers have the same rights as other citizens, said prosecutor Paul Dawley... Not in the performance of their duties, otherwise we truly have secret police. Not a good thing. I hope Hyde appeals; this is bad law. There is definitely existing case law (which I will try to

Re: CDR: Re: Recording conversations and the laws of men

2001-04-27 Thread Sunder
Jim Choate wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Tim May wrote: Again, just so. The laws about tape-recording conversations have no basis in any moral theory I can support. If I choose to gargoyle Finaly an open and honest Tim May, he doesn't believe in self defence. I believe I can die

Re: CDR: Re: Recording conversations and the laws of men

2001-04-27 Thread David Honig
At 06:48 PM 4/25/01 -0400, Sunder wrote: David Honig wrote: Personally I plan to teach Jr. how to do covert recording; otherwise it might be his word vs. a schoolyard bully or state-employed bully. [FWIW, I think some girl was recently acquitted of wiretap charges for taping or imaging a

Re: CDR: Re: Recording conversations and the laws of men

2001-04-25 Thread Sunder
David Honig wrote: Personally I plan to teach Jr. how to do covert recording; otherwise it might be his word vs. a schoolyard bully or state-employed bully. [FWIW, I think some girl was recently acquitted of wiretap charges for taping or imaging a teacher's lecture (for review later)