know whether it
happened from domain to range or from range to domain].
Best wishes,
Patrick
De :Martin Doerr
A : crm-sig
Date : 04/01/2018 16:37
Objet : [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
Envoyé par :"Crm-sig"
Dear All,
Should we cha
A
> Am 04.01.2018 um 16:31 schrieb Martin Doerr :
>
> Dear All,
> Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for inverse
> also the order of the two labels?:
> e.g.:
>
> A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of (has
> translation)
> OR
> B) P
, January 4, 2018 9:31 AM
To: crm-sig
Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
Dear All,
Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for inverse
also the order of the two labels?:
e.g.:
A) P73 has translation (is translation of)
I also prefer A.
R
From: Crm-sig on behalf of "van Leusen, P.M."
Date: Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 8:50 AM
To: Martin Doerr
Cc: crm-sig
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
I vote A.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Martin Doerr
I vote A.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Dear All,
> Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for
> inverse also the order of the two labels?:
> e.g.:
>
> A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of (has
> translation)
> O
?A
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Jim Salmons
Sent: 04 January 2018 16:58
To: 'crm-sig'
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
Choice (A)
Happy-Healthy New Year,
-: Jim :-
Jim Salmons
On 04/01/2018 15:31, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Dear All,
> Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for
> inverse also the order of the two labels?:
> e.g.:
>
> A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of
> (has translation)
> OR
> B) P73 has translat
<http://www.medium.com/@Jim_Salmons/> www.medium.com/@Jim_Salmons/ (my
#CognitiveComputing/#DigitalHumanities articles)
From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Martin Doerr
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:32 AM
To: crm-sig
Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label o
nuary 2018 15:32
To: crm-sig
Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
Dear All,
Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for inverse
also the order of the two labels?:
e.g.:
A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i i
Dear All,
Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for
inverse also the order of the two labels?:
e.g.:
A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of
(has translation)
OR
B) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i has translation (is
t
10 matches
Mail list logo
