Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig]

Dear all,

The result of this e-vote is

8 yes

0 no

0 veto


Best,

Christian-Emil



From: Christian-Emil Smith Ore
Sent: 21 March 2022 12:24
To: crm-sig
Subject: E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)


Dear all,

As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.

In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – 
CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change the 
quantification of  appears in, restricted to, typical for to many-to-many, as 
well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be assigned the 
following AP numbers:

  *   AP29 appears in
  *   AP30 restricted to
  *   AP31 typical for

The new scope notes are 
working definitions. The relations among types (issue 
407)  be 
taken into account, together with skos and other standards.

HW: SdS to edit them.

The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the 
end of this email:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t


You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses 
which will be a separate e-vote)


YES if you accept the edited texts

NO if you don't accept the edited texts

VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state


The voting is open until 4th April.


Best,

Christian-Emil



294: E55 Type relations
The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier to 
follow the differences.

OLD
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within this 
period. The
generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological 
or other processes.
This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the 
class of object in the
archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological observations: 
If the genesis of an
object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the 
context in which it
was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, 
ceteris paribus,
that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with one 
of the instance of E4
Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ properties.

NEW
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought 
into existence during
this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, 
biological, geological or other
processes.
This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated 
object kind in the
archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can 
plausibly be assumed to
fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this 
property supports
reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part 
of, or overlaps with,
one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has 
appeared. Such weak
statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological 
observations.
Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and AP31 
typical for.

OLD
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been generated 
in this period.
This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the kind 
of object in the
observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be 
assumed to fall within
the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with 
this property would
support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context 
actually forms part of
the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it.
In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they 
are still in use,
and objects from later periods may have been pushed into an older context.
Weaker claims can be made using the properties ‘typical for’ and ‘appears in’.

In First Order Logic:
[…]
AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z)

NEW
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Zoe Schubert via Crm-sig]

Vielen Dank für die Nachricht!

Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird 
nicht weitergeleitet.

Mit besten Grüßen
Zoe Schubert

Am 21.03.2022 um 12:24 schrieb Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig 
:


___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Zoe Schubert via Crm-sig]

Vielen Dank für die Nachricht!

Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird 
nicht weitergeleitet.

Mit besten Grüßen
Zoe Schubert

Am 21.03.2022 um 12:36 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig :


___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Zoe Schubert via Crm-sig]

Vielen Dank für die Nachricht!

Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird 
nicht weitergeleitet.

Mit besten Grüßen
Zoe Schubert

Am 21.03.2022 um 13:43 schrieb Hiebel, Gerald via Crm-sig 
:


___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Zoe Schubert via Crm-sig]

Vielen Dank für die Nachricht!

Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird 
nicht weitergeleitet.

Mit besten Grüßen
Zoe Schubert

Am 26.03.2022 um 21:44 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig :

> Yes
> 
> Pat Riva
> Acting University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim
> Concordia University / Université Concordia
> 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331
> Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8
> Canada
> pat.r...@concordia.ca
> 
> 
> 
> From: Crm-sig  on behalf of Christian-Emil 
> Smith Ore via Crm-sig 
> Sent: March 21, 2022 7:24 AM
> To: crm-sig 
> Subject: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)
>  
> Dear all,
> As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.   
> 
> In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR 
> – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change 
> the quantification of  appears in, restricted to, typical for to 
> many-to-many, as well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be 
> assigned the following AP numbers: 
>   •   AP29 appears in
>   •   AP30 restricted to
>   •   AP31 typical for
> The new scope notes are working definitions. The relations among types (issue 
> 407)  be taken into account, together with skos and other standards.
> HW: SdS to edit them.
> The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the 
> end of this email:
> 
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t
> 
> 
> 
> You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses 
> which will be a separate e-vote)
> 
> 
> YES if you accept the edited texts
> NO if you don't accept the edited texts
> VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state
> 
> 
> The voting is open until 4th April.
> 
> 
> Best,
> Christian-Emil
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 294: E55 Type relations
> The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier 
> to follow the differences.
> 
> 
> OLD
> AP29 appears in
> Domain: E55 Type
> Range: E4 Period
> Subproperty:
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
> instance of E55) to an instance of E4
> Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within 
> this period. The
> generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological 
> or other processes.
> This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the 
> class of object in the
> archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological 
> observations: If the genesis of an
> object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of 
> the context in which it
> was found, then the statement made with this property would support 
> reasoning, ceteris paribus,
> that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with 
> one of the instance of E4
> Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
> Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ 
> properties.
> 
> NEW
> AP29 appears in
> Domain: E55 Type
> Range: E4 Period
> Subproperty:
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
> instance of E55 Type) with an
> instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought 
> into existence during
> this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, 
> biological, geological or other
> processes.
> This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated 
> object kind in the
> archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can 
> plausibly be assumed to
> fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this 
> property supports
> reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part 
> of, or overlaps with,
> one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has 
> appeared. Such weak
> statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological 
> observations.
> Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and AP31 
> typical for.
> 
> OLD
> AP30 restricted to
> Domain: E55 Type
> Range: E4 Period
> Subproperty: appears in
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) 
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
> instance of E55) to an instance of E4
> Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been 
> generated in this period.
> This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the 
> kind of object in the
> observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be 
> assumed to fall within
> the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made 
> with this property would
> support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that 

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Zoe Schubert via Crm-sig]

Vielen Dank für die Nachricht!

Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird 
nicht weitergeleitet.

Mit besten Grüßen
Zoe Schubert

Am 22.03.2022 um 13:14 schrieb George Bruseker via Crm-sig 
:

> Yes, to the reformulated text.
> 
> With this caveat, that the underlined in the formulation, " This property 
> associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55) to an instance 
> of E4 Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated 
> within this period," sounds stylistically  awkward. Could just switch out for 
> 'in order to indicate that'?
> 
> Best,
> 
> George
> 
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:47 PM Hiebel, Gerald via Crm-sig 
>  wrote:
> YES
> Best,
> Gerald
>  
> From: Crm-sig  on behalf of Martin Doerr via 
> Crm-sig 
> Reply to: Martin Doerr 

> > Date: Monday, 21. March 2022 at 12:44
> To: "crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" 
> 
> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of 
> issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)
>  
> TES!
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via 
> Crm-sig wrote:
> Dear all,
> As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.   
> In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR 
> – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change 
> the quantification of  appears in, restricted to, typical for to 
> many-to-many, as well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be 
> assigned the following AP numbers: 
>   •   AP29 appears in 
>   •   AP30 restricted to 
>   •   AP31 typical for 
> The new scope notes are working definitions. The relations among types (issue 
> 407)  be taken into account, together with skos and other standards.
> HW: SdS to edit them.
> The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the 
> end of this email: 
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t
>  
> You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses 
> which will be a separate e-vote)
>  
> YES if you accept the edited texts
> NO if you don't accept the edited texts
> VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state
>  
> The voting is open until 4th April.
>  
> Best,
> Christian-Emil
>  
>  
> 294: E55 Type relations
> The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier 
> to follow the differences.
>  
> OLD
> AP29 appears in
> Domain: E55 Type
> Range: E4 Period
> Subproperty:
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
> instance of E55) to an instance of E4
> Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within 
> this period. The
> generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological 
> or other processes.
> This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the 
> class of object in the
> archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological 
> observations: If the genesis of an
> object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of 
> the context in which it
> was found, then the statement made with this property would support 
> reasoning, ceteris paribus,
> that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with 
> one of the instance of E4
> Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
> Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ 
> properties.
>  
> NEW
> AP29 appears in
> Domain: E55 Type
> Range: E4 Period
> Subproperty:
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
> instance of E55 Type) with an
> instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought 
> into existence during
> this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, 
> biological, geological or other
> processes.
> This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated 
> object kind in the
> archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can 
> plausibly be assumed to
> fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this 
> property supports
> reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part 
> of, or overlaps with,
> one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has 
> appeared. Such weak
> statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological 
> observations.
> Stronger claim

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Pat Riva via Crm-sig]

Yes

Pat Riva
Acting University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim
Concordia University / Université Concordia
1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331
Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8
Canada
pat.r...@concordia.ca



From: Crm-sig  on behalf of Christian-Emil Smith 
Ore via Crm-sig 
Sent: March 21, 2022 7:24 AM
To: crm-sig 
Subject: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)


Dear all,

As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.

In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – 
CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change the 
quantification of  appears in, restricted to, typical for to many-to-many, as 
well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be assigned the 
following AP numbers:

  *   AP29 appears in
  *   AP30 restricted to
  *   AP31 typical for

The new scope 
notes
 are working definitions. The relations among types (issue 
407)
  be taken into account, together with skos and other standards.

HW: SdS to edit them.

The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the 
end of this email:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t


You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses 
which will be a separate e-vote)


YES if you accept the edited texts

NO if you don't accept the edited texts

VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state


The voting is open until 4th April.


Best,

Christian-Emil



294: E55 Type relations
The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier to 
follow the differences.

OLD
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within this 
period. The
generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological 
or other processes.
This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the 
class of object in the
archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological observations: 
If the genesis of an
object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the 
context in which it
was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, 
ceteris paribus,
that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with one 
of the instance of E4
Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ properties.

NEW
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought 
into existence during
this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, 
biological, geological or other
processes.
This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated 
object kind in the
archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can 
plausibly be assumed to
fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this 
property supports
reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part 
of, or overlaps with,
one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has 
appeared. Such weak
statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological 
observations.
Stronger 

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[George Bruseker via Crm-sig]

Yes, to the reformulated text.

With this caveat, that the underlined in the formulation, " This property
associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55) to an
instance of E4 Period *for indicating that* objects of this kind have been
generated within this period," sounds stylistically  awkward. Could just
switch out for 'in order to indicate that'?

Best,

George

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:47 PM Hiebel, Gerald via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:

> YES
>
> Best,
>
> Gerald
>
>
>
> *From: *Crm-sig  on behalf of Martin Doerr
> via Crm-sig 
> *Reply to: *Martin Doerr 
> *Date: *Monday, 21. March 2022 at 12:44
> *To: *"crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" 
> *Subject: *Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294
> (CRMarchaeo)
>
>
>
> TES!
>
> Martin
>
> On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.
>
> In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd
> FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to
> change the quantification of  *appears in*, *restricted to*, *typical
> for *to *many-to-many, *as well as redraft their scope notes. The
> properties will be assigned the following AP numbers:
>
>- AP29 appears in
>- AP30 restricted to
>- AP31 typical for
>
> The new scope notes <https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/294_0.docx> are
> working definitions. The relations among types (issue 407
> <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-407-ordinal-property-for-e55-type>)
> be taken into account, together with skos and other standards.
>
> HW: SdS to edit them.
>
> The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a
> the end of this email:
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t
>
>
>
> You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the
> inverses which will be a separate e-vote)
>
>
>
> YES if you accept the edited texts
>
> NO if you don't accept the edited texts
>
> VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state
>
>
>
> The voting is open until 4th April.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Christian-Emil
>
>
>
>
>
> 294: E55 Type relations
>
> The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it
> easier to follow the differences.
>
>
>
> OLD
>
> AP29 appears in
>
> Domain: E55 Type
>
> Range: E4 Period
>
> Subproperty:
>
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
>
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an
> instance of E55) to an instance of E4
>
> Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within
> this period. The
>
> generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological,
> geological or other processes.
>
> This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of
> the class of object in the
>
> archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological
> observations: If the genesis of an
>
> object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of
> the context in which it
>
> was found, then the statement made with this property would support
> reasoning, ceteris paribus,
>
> that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with
> one of the instance of E4
>
> Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
>
> Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’
> properties.
>
>
>
> NEW
>
> AP29 appears in
>
> Domain: E55 Type
>
> Range: E4 Period
>
> Subproperty:
>
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
>
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an
> instance of E55 Type) with an
>
> instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been
> brought into existence during
>
> this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human,
> biological, geological or other
>
> processes.
>
> This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the
> associated object kind in the
>
> archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type
> can plausibly be assumed to
>
> fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then
> this property supports
>
> reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms
> part of, or overlaps with,
>
> one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has
> appeared. Such weak
>
> sta

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Hiebel, Gerald via Crm-sig]

YES
Best,
Gerald

From: Crm-sig  on behalf of Martin Doerr via 
Crm-sig 
Reply to: Martin Doerr 
Date: Monday, 21. March 2022 at 12:44
To: "crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" 
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

TES!

Martin

On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:

Dear all,

As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.

In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – 
CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change the 
quantification of  appears in, restricted to, typical for to many-to-many, as 
well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be assigned the 
following AP numbers:

  *   AP29 appears in
  *   AP30 restricted to
  *   AP31 typical for

The new scope notes<https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/294_0.docx> are 
working definitions. The relations among types (issue 
407<http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-407-ordinal-property-for-e55-type>)  be 
taken into account, together with skos and other standards.

HW: SdS to edit them.
The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the 
end of this email:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t



You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses 
which will be a separate e-vote)



YES if you accept the edited texts

NO if you don't accept the edited texts

VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state



The voting is open until 4th April.



Best,

Christian-Emil




294: E55 Type relations
The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier to 
follow the differences.

OLD
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within this 
period. The
generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological 
or other processes.
This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the 
class of object in the
archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological observations: 
If the genesis of an
object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the 
context in which it
was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, 
ceteris paribus,
that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with one 
of the instance of E4
Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ properties.

NEW
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought 
into existence during
this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, 
biological, geological or other
processes.
This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated 
object kind in the
archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can 
plausibly be assumed to
fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this 
property supports
reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part 
of, or overlaps with,
one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has 
appeared. Such weak
statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological 
observations.
Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and AP31 
typical for.

OLD
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an 
instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been generated 
in this period.
This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the kind 
of object in the
observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be 
assumed to fall within
the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with 
this property would
support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context 
actually forms part of
the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it.
In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they 
are still in use,
and objects from later periods may have been pushed into an older context.
Weaker claims can be made using the properties ‘typical for’ and ‘appears in’.

In First Order Logic:
[…]
AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[Martin Doerr via Crm-sig]

TES!

Martin

On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:


Dear all,

As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.

In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 
42nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's 
proposal to change the quantification of /appears in/, /restricted 
to/, /typical for /to /many-to-many, /as well as redraft their scope 
notes. The properties will be assigned the following AP numbers:


  * AP29 appears in
  * AP30 restricted to
  * AP31 typical for

The new scope notes 
 are working 
definitions. The relations among types (issue 407 
)  
be taken into account, together with skos and other standards.


HW: SdS to edit them.

The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in 
a the end of this email:


https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t 




You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the 
inverses which will be a separate e-vote)



YES if you accept the edited texts

NO if you don't accept the edited texts

VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state


The voting is open until 4th April.


Best,

Christian-Emil



294: E55 Type relations
The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it 
easier to follow the differences.


OLD
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as 
an instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated 
within this period. The
generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, 
geological or other processes.
This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution 
of the class of object in the
archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological 
observations: If the genesis of an
object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the 
genesis of the context in which it
was found, then the statement made with this property would support 
reasoning, ceteris paribus,
that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps 
with one of the instance of E4

Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ 
properties.


NEW
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as 
an instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been 
brought into existence during
this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, 
biological, geological or other

processes.
This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the 
associated object kind in the
archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the 
type can plausibly be assumed to
fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then 
this property supports
reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context 
forms part of, or overlaps with,
one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type 
has appeared. Such weak
statements may also be useful in the context of geological or 
paleontological observations.
Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to 
and AP31 typical for.


OLD
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as 
an instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been 
generated in this period.
This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of 
the kind of object in the
observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can 
plausibly be assumed to fall within
the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement 
made with this property would
support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the 
find context actually forms part of

the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it.
In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context 
because they are still in use,

and objects from later periods may have been pushed into an older context.
Weaker claims can be made using the properties ‘typical for’ and 
‘appears in’.


In First Order Logic:
[…]
AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z)

NEW
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a