Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse IDE 2024-06 Project Participation Page

Mwe is 2.18.0 and Xtext is 2.35.0 Wayne Beaton via cross-project-issues-dev < cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> schrieb am Mi. 22. Mai 2024 um 23:56: > Greetings folks! > > I've assembled the release information for participating projects here >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext M1 might be delayed

managed to build a m0 Am Mo., 8. Apr. 2024 um 14:38 Uhr schrieb Christian Dietrich < christian.dietrich.opensou...@gmail.com>: > Hi Xtext M1 might be delayed / skipped due to > https://github.com/eclipse/xtext/issues/2982 > ___ cross-pro

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext M1 might be delayed

Hi Xtext M1 might be delayed / skipped due to https://github.com/eclipse/xtext/issues/2982 ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit

[cross-project-issues-dev] simrel build broken

the simrel build currently fails with *09:23:27* Unable to load repository https://download.eclipse.org/windowbuilder/updates/milestone/S202309051601*09:23:31* Unable to load repository p2:https://download.eclipse.org/windowbuilder/updates/milestone/S202309051601*09:23:31* Build failed!

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Installation problem

see also https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg19696.html ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit

[cross-project-issues-dev] New Xpand free Xpect version

We are currently developing a new Xpand free Xpect version. You can find the repo at https://ci.eclipse.org/xpect/job/Xpect/job/modernizeXpect/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/org.eclipse.xpect.releng/p2-repository/target/repository/ (or as download:

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext 2.32.0.M0 is out

Hello Xtexters Xtext 2.32.0.M0 is out You can find it at https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/modeling/tmf/xtext/downloads/drops/2.32.0.M0/tmf-xtext-Update-2.32.0.M0.zip https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/milestones/2.32.0.M0/ and on maven central soon.

[cross-project-issues-dev] Access to org.eclipse.simrel.build

Hi, I can no longer interact with org.eclipse.simrel.build git repo e.g. pulling cdietr...@git.eclipse.org: Permission denied (publickey). fatal: Could not read from remote repository. does anybody else know to solve the problem ~Christian -- Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman),

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext 2.31.0.M0 is out: downstream consumers might have to take action

Hello Xtexters Xtext 2.31.0.M0 is out You can find it at https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/modeling/tmf/xtext/downloads/drops/2.31.0.M0/tmf-xtext-Update-2.31.0.M0.zip https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/milestones/2.31.0.M0/ and on maven central soon.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [epp-dev] EPP 2023-03 M3

this is known, but it basically says: instead of using 1 orbit create your own orbit. work has to be done in each project Am 27.02.23 um 14:18 schrieb Ed Merks: I sent this note to cross-projects in January on this topic: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg19562.html

[cross-project-issues-dev] Fwd: [epp-dev] EPP 2023-03 M3

Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Re: [epp-dev] EPP 2023-03 M3 Datum: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:27:57 +0100 Von:Christian Dietrich An: epp-...@eclipse.org old lsp4j means old gson. i assume besides that we still have a maven gson and an orbit gson

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext M3 late

Hi all Xtext M3 is currently blocked by sonatype oss staging outage. dont know when this is be back and we can publish our M3 Thanks Christian -- Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] A future without source features?

https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- Christian Dietrich (Diplom-Informatiker (BA)) Softwareentwickler / -Architekt Committer and Co-Lead for Eclipse Xtext Tel.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-0 Fax.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-29 Mobil: +49 (0) 151 / 173969 17 Mail: christia

[cross-project-issues-dev] Fwd: Re: [orbit-dev] Retiring EBR

-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Von: Christian Dietrich Datum: 11. Jan. 2023, 18:22 +0100 An: ebr-...@eclipse.org, Orbit Developer discussion Cc: Runtime Project PMC mailing list Betreff: Re: [orbit-dev] Retiring EBR > Xtext still uses orbit so if this leads to orbit retirem

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2022-12 participating projects page

had a look at the code, xpand is an optional dependency for some xtext parts. so it is basically just providing 3 plugins and not participating as a whole project Am 03.12.22 um 06:55 schrieb Christian Dietrich: Hi, I am not sure if Xpand  is still actively participating and/or if it is used

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2022-12 participating projects page

Hi, I am not sure if Xpand  is still actively participating and/or if it is used anywhere at all. Christian Am 02.12.22 um 23:11 schrieb Wayne Beaton: Greetings folks! I've assembled the list of participating projects for the Eclipse IDE

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Houston We Have a Problem

@Ed could you please give these two repos a test if we are fine: https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/mwe/updates/nightly/ https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/nightly/ Thanks and kind regards, Christian Am 14.11.2022 um 13:43 schrieb Ed Merks: Recent versions of

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext 2.29.0.M2 is out

Hello Xtexters Xtext 2.29.0.M2 is out You can find it at https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/downloads/drops/2.29.0/S202210240854/tmf-xtext-Update-2.29.0.M2.zip https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/milestones/S202210240854/ and on maven central soon. Xtext/Xtend

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext 2.29.0.M2 will require Kava 11, support Java 17 and Source and Target (and thus will no longer support Java 8)

Hi all, Xtext 2.29.0.M2 will support Java 17 and Source and Target and will no longer support Java 8 and thus require Java 11 as minimum Runtime Environment. The corresponding code was merge to Xtext nightly today. Minimal tested Target platform was bumped from Oxygen to 2022-03

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Especially LSP4E (but also Viatra and Papyrus)

This is long fixed in lsp4e but I don’t know why no new milestone was contributed Am 26. Aug. 2022, 10:50 +0200 schrieb Christoph Läubrich : > Hi Ed, > > this was also complained at Tycho some times before [1], but it was > argued it is a valid use-case and should be supported... > > So my guess

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Current Simrel repo inconsistent?

on: org.eclipse.equinox.p2.iu; org.eclipse.e4.rcp.feature.group [4.25.0.v20220727-1405,4.25.0.v20220727-1405] -- Christian Dietrich (Diplom-Informatiker (BA)) Softwareentwickler / -Architekt Committer and Co-Lead for Eclipse Xtext Tel.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-0 Fax.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-29

[cross-project-issues-dev] Current Simrel repo inconsistent?

*hi, anybody have an idea whats broken here? 21:33:56* [ERROR] Cannot resolve project dependencies: *21:33:56* [ERROR] Software being installed: org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group 4.25.0.v20220728-1800 *21:33:56* [ERROR] Missing requirement: org.apache.xmlgraphics 2.6.0.v20210409-0748

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PGP Signing on ci.eclipse.org

@ed you may check what we have done for mwe (the problem there was centos8) we also had problems with that combi in xtext and xpecthttps://github.com/eclipse/Xpect/commit/241afc416771950a35d98a8c16e319159414f338 https://github.com/eclipse/mwe/commit/130decb78eb11577aa850cdbdc10f7d4ec92f5a1 in

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Jenkins slave pods have lost their git installation?

We see the same problem in Xtext https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/1444 Am 21. Juni 2022, 00:59 +0200 schrieb Thomas Wolf : > On 20.06.22 23:27 , Thomas Wolf wrote: > > It looks as if (some?) Jenkins slave pods no longer have a > > git installation. > > > > See for instance >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

interestingly i end up with id    State   Bundle 285    RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0 377    RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157 osgi> Am 06.05.22 um 07:47 schrieb Christian Dietrich: https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2022-06/202205061000/plugins/ has

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2022-06/202205061000/plugins/ has asm tree from maven but no asm from maven but asm from orbit instead Am 06.05.22 um 02:08 schrieb Jonah Graham: On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham wrote: OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

i mean the milestone 2 jonah is talking about Am 06.05.22 um 07:44 schrieb Andrey Loskutov: m2? Do you mean p2? p2 is in the SDK, m2 not. Am 6. Mai 2022 07:37:49 MESZ schrieb Christian Dietrich : i dont see m2 there Am 06.05.22 um 07:37 schrieb Andrey Loskutov: Still here, since ever

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

i dont see m2 there Am 06.05.22 um 07:37 schrieb Andrey Loskutov: Still here, since ever: https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/ Am 6. Mai 2022 07:35:23 MESZ schrieb Christian Dietrich : where can one find "eclipse sdk" downloads nowadays? google does not seem to help A

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

where can one find "eclipse sdk" downloads nowadays? google does not seem to help Am 06.05.22 um 02:08 schrieb Jonah Graham: On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham wrote: OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel testing to do: 1- Which bundles ends up SimRel - or do both

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

i also wonder where the asm tree dependency is coming from. Xtext does not have it directly. Am 06.05.22 um 02:08 schrieb Jonah Graham: On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham wrote: OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel testing to do: 1- Which bundles ends up SimRel -

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

from my pov it is not ok. why are both installed? in the xtext features we have https://github.com/eclipse/xtext-umbrella/blob/91c24b6cc77e6f7840a317feb7249e7aea3f8dcc/releng/org.eclipse.xtext.runtime.feature/feature.xml#L31 why does the org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0 not match against it? Am

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext 2.27.0 M1 late

could resolve the problems. M1 is out now Am 11.04.22 um 11:27 schrieb Christian Dietrich: Hi, i am not sure if i will finish the M1 today so it might take until tomorrow for our M1 contribution -- Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, Abdelghani El-Kacimi

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext 2.27.0 M1 late

Hi, i am not sure if i will finish the M1 today so it might take until tomorrow for our M1 contribution -- Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PlatformRel vs SimRel vs Orbit Abolishment frustration / Xtext leaving SimRel (again) ?!?

created https://github.com/eclipse/ebr/pull/53/files Am 07.04.22 um 14:11 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:09 PM Christian Dietrich wrote: i cannot even reproduce this using java18 mvn ebr:create-recipe -DgroupId=org.antlr -DartifactId=antlr-runtime

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PlatformRel vs SimRel vs Orbit Abolishment frustration / Xtext leaving SimRel (again) ?!?

can reproduce now Am 07.04.22 um 14:11 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:09 PM Christian Dietrich wrote: i cannot even reproduce this using java18 mvn ebr:create-recipe -DgroupId=org.antlr -DartifactId=antlr-runtime -Dversion=3.5.2 -DbundleSymbolicName

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PlatformRel vs SimRel vs Orbit Abolishment frustration / Xtext leaving SimRel (again) ?!?

: "mac os x", version: "11.6.4", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac" Am 07.04.22 um 14:11 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:09 PM Christian Dietrich wrote: i cannot even reproduce this using java18 mvn ebr:create-recipe -DgroupId=

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PlatformRel vs SimRel vs Orbit Abolishment frustration / Xtext leaving SimRel (again) ?!?

but somehow every change is also disruptive and very often time consuming such that you much spend time on what feels like a gigantic no-op... More comments below. On 07.04.2022 04:54, Chri

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PlatformRel vs SimRel vs Orbit Abolishment frustration / Xtext leaving SimRel (again) ?!?

a gigantic no-op... More comments below. On 07.04.2022 04:54, Christian Dietrich wrote: > Hi all, my frustration of the current state has cost me another > sleepless night and thus i need to start this discussion again. > > All of the following statements ar

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PlatformRel vs SimRel vs Orbit Abolishment frustration / Xtext leaving SimRel (again) ?!?

So platform does not use oomph? -- Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus (Vors./chairman), Harald Goertz, Eric Swehla Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered

[cross-project-issues-dev] PlatformRel vs SimRel vs Orbit Abolishment frustration / Xtext leaving SimRel (again) ?!?

Hi all, my frustration of the current state has cost me another sleepless night and thus i need to start this discussion again. All of the following statements are subjective and describe my personal view and option and feelings. Trigger was

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Declaring Orbit Build: S20220403232146 (2022-06 M1)

ls/orbit/downloads/drops/R20201118194144/ is the many times patched version of that. ~~~ Jonah Graham Kichwa Coders www.kichwacoders.com <http://www.kichwacoders.com> On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 01:03, Christian Dietrich wrote: @Jonah does this mean i deed to use 10 repos to get the sum of my

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Declaring Orbit Build: S20220403232146 (2022-06 M1)

' on. Is a Bugzilla required to retain it? I'm not clear why lpg.runtime.java is missing. Is a Bugzilla required to rectify an oversight? Are there other contributions that have suffered the same erroneous excclusion?     Regards         Ed Willink On 04/04/2022 06:03, Christian Dietrich wrote: @Jonah

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Declaring Orbit Build: S20220403232146 (2022-06 M1)

JUnit 4.12.0 is missing too so is com.google.gson 2.8.9 Am 04.04.22 um 07:03 schrieb Christian Dietrich: @Jonah does this mean i deed to use 10 repos to get the sum of my orbit deps? i am getting Error: Failed to resolve target definition /home/runner/work/xtext-reference-projects/xtext

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Declaring Orbit Build: S20220403232146 (2022-06 M1)

@Jonah does this mean i deed to use 10 repos to get the sum of my orbit deps? i am getting Error: Failed to resolve target definition

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Log4j 1.x vulnerability

channels. The re-bundled version of reload4j is available in the latest stable build of Eclipse Orbit. Logpresso has added handling for the re-bundled variant and will not detect the vulnerability in its latest version. Christian Dietrich schrieb am Di., 8. Feb. 20

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Log4j 1.x vulnerability

"bogus" Am 08.02.22 um 17:16 schrieb Ed Merks: Christian, I *assume *it is not jar signed but rather only has an external PGP signature. Regards,... Ed On 08.02.2022 16:48, Christian Dietrich wrote: is the orginal signing not enhough? and what about about.html and other eclips

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Log4j 1.x vulnerability

is the orginal signing not enhough? and what about about.html and other eclipse rule foo. Am 08.02.22 um 16:32 schrieb Matthias Sohn: I went ahead and pushed the naive addition of reload4j 1.2.19 disguised as bundle org.apache.log4j to Orbit

[cross-project-issues-dev] PGP signing of Xpect and Certificate Validation Issue

Hi, does anyone have an idea what could cause the warning when installing Xpect artifacts into eclipse https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/842 Thanks Christian -- Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Potential vulnerability in Apache Xerces 1.12.1 (CVE-2022-23437)

i guess orbit can also decide to drop old stuff. do you know how milestones are built? i still miss orbit m2 Am 31.01.22 um 15:12 schrieb Pierre-Charles David: Le 27/01/2022 à 17:17, Pierre-Charles David a écrit : Le 27/01/2022 à 01:25, Nitin Dahyabhai a écrit : Of course, only now do I

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] "Open an online workspace in Gitpod" suddenly showing on our project PRs as an action

In Xtext we have the same problem Am 08.01.22 um 01:18 schrieb Jeen Broekstra: Did something get configured at the org level to enable Gitpod to show up on pull requests? In our Github project (eclipse/rdf4j) we have suddenly started seeing this additional item in the list of PR status

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Login Problems?

i also cannot log in Am 25.12.21 um 11:41 schrieb Ed Merks: > Does anyone else have permission problems logging into ci.eclipse.org > instances or with committing changes to git.eclipse.org? > > https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/707 > >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Retention time for SimRel releases

AM Christian Dietrich wrote: i would like to see better support to maintain e.g. composite updates sites for that. but with 2 releases i think this is the death to composite updates sites for multiples releases in general as there is not much to find. I don't see

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Retention time for SimRel releases

i would like to see better support to maintain e.g. composite updates sites for that. but with 2 releases i think this is the death to composite updates sites for multiples releases in general as there is not much to find. Am 19.11.21 um 10:43 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov: On Fri, Nov 19,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Retention time for SimRel releases

se > http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/downloads.php > > It might make sense to add additional redirects. > > Regards, > > Fred > > On 18.11.21 19:05, Christian Dietrich wrote: >> hi, will there be transparent redirect or do we have to adapt all >> targets e.g. against oxygen?

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Retention time for SimRel releases

hi, will there be transparent redirect or do we have to adapt all targets e.g. against oxygen? Am 18.11.21 um 18:43 schrieb Frederic Gurr: > Hi, > > On https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/78 > ("Download.e.o size too big for mirrors"), Aleksandar Kurtakov pointed > out, that a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] OCL, QVTd late

Xtext+MWE builds also have storage write problems https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=575202 Am 03.08.21 um 11:40 schrieb Ed Willink: > Hi > > The OCL M2 contribution is already late and likely to be much later > since the OCL GIT repo remains stale and the >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Move JDT to Java 11

их утопающих > > https://www.eclipse.org/user/aloskutov > > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/lis

[cross-project-issues-dev] Problems with signing service

Hi, our curls to https://cbi.eclipse.org/jarsigner/sign fail with error code 92 today. https://ci.eclipse.org/xtext/job/releng/job/sign-and-deploy/983/console anybody else having problems with the signing service? Thanks and Regards Christian --

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [tycho-user] Problem building with latest 2021-06 and tycho 2.3

Indeed, consuming platform from https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.20-I-builds seems to work as a workaround Am 17.04.21 um 09:16 schrieb Christian Dietrich: > Hi, we have http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2021-06/202104161000 > only. thus i assume the M1 repo is incomplet

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [tycho-user] Problem building with latest 2021-06 and tycho 2.3

Hi, we have http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2021-06/202104161000 only. thus i assume the M1 repo is incomplete only. here is the project i try to build https://github.com/itemis/xtext-reference-projects/tree/cd_tycho23/domainmodel/2.26.0 and here the target

[cross-project-issues-dev] Problem building with latest 2021-06 and tycho 2.3

Hi, when i am building my plugin with tycho 2.3 against 2021-06 target platform i am getting this error. Error: Cannot resolve target definition: Error: Problems resolving provisioning plan.: Error: Unable to satisfy dependency from org.eclipse.e4.rcp.feature.group 4.20.0.v20210407-2205 to

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ci.eclipse.org speed

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=571952 Am 28. März 2021, 19:59 +0200 schrieb Ed Willink : > Hi > > In the last couple of weeks OCL compatibility tests seem to be taking 25 > to 50% longer, sometimes failing to complete within a once-generous timeout. > > Is this a known phenomenon or

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext Leaving Eclipse Simrel with 2021-06

list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mail

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] The "new user -> ECA -> signed-off by" workflow is broken

We at Xtext see a similar result, especially with changes done via github web. Telling people to clone and signoff for a trivial fix often leads to omitting the PR and recreate the change ourselves. Am 04.03.21 um 15:51 schrieb Wim Jongman: > > 2. ay: You did not sign the ECA. > 3. 21% of the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] publishing and maintaining a composite update site from JIRO

Hi, maybe you can recycle the Xtext approach https://github.com/eclipse/xtext-umbrella/blob/5f10d83c2c11dc82dbcf4437206bd568e317da9c/releng/jenkins/sign-and-deploy/Jenkinsfile#L245

[cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext wont make it into M2 due late Guava contribution in Orbit

Hi, Eclipse Orbit will contribute Guava 30.1 to Eclipse 2021-03 and also will drop the security flawed Guava 27.1. As we have to adapt Xtext and MWE to the new Guava and also have to publish milestones to Maven Central we wont make it in time for M2. Thus we will skip M2 and release the M2s

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Outdated content at help.eclipse.org/2020-12

also the Xtext docs is outdated. Am 18.12.20 um 17:54 schrieb Thomas Wolf: > Hi, > > why does https://help.eclipse.org/2020-12/index.jsp show the EGit > documentation from EGit 5.8.0 instead of the one from EGit 5.10.0? > > Cheers, > >   Thomas > ___ >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] "latest" repo for orbit

do you know https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-R/ Am 24.10.20 um 15:03 schrieb Wim Jongman: > Hi, > > We have a convenient "latest" repository for the release train and the > eclipse platform. It would be nice if we could also get these for orbit. > > e.g. >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] download.eclipse.org/releases/2020-12 created, download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2020-12 missing

t more > convenient > (for me) for generating the catalog if it's (the train and the epp > repos) there significantly earlier.   Given they just compose the > previous release repos, they could be created at any time... > > As Christian suggests, important that if t

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] download.eclipse.org/releases/2020-12 created, download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2020-12 missing

what is a reasonable date > and time for them to be created? > > > Regards, > > Fred > > > > On 15.09.20 10:41, Ed Merks wrote: >> It would be great if both existed now so that I can generate the catalog >> now, rather than regenerating it against soon after the rele

[cross-project-issues-dev] download.eclipse.org/releases/2020-12 created, download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2020-12 missing

hi, it looks like download.eclipse.org/releases/2020-12 was created, but download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2020-12 is still missing*10:26:18* [ERROR] Failed to resolve target definition

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Infrastructure Problems?

lipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- Christian Dietrich (Diplom-Informatiker (BA)) Softwareentwickler / -Architekt Committer and Co-Lead for Eclipse Xtext Tel.: +49 (0) 711 / 34 21 91-0 Fax.: +49 (0) 711 / 3

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] OCL, QVTd, QVTo failures

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=565417 Am 16. Aug. 2020, 11:26 +0200 schrieb Ed Willink : > Hi > > The OCL, QVTd and QVTo weekly forced nightly re-builds have all failed > today with a class loading problem that at first glance looks like > another gratuitous

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Keeping SimRel Aggregation Functional

i also noticed that the validation job does not seem to be running https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/16 or do i miss out something? ~Christian Am 01.07.20 um 07:32 schrieb Ed Merks: > I wonder what the process is for keeping the SimRel aggregation > functional

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] org.apache.commons.codec

you may follow https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=560438 Am 24.02.20 um 15:43 schrieb Jonah Graham: > Hi folks, > > I am trying to resolve a dependency problem - there are multiple > versions of the following in  > https://download.eclipse.org/staging/2020-03/plugins/ > >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can SLF4J be made the official logging API for Eclipse projects?

eady approved may be used without creating a CQ. > > HTH, > > Wayne > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:30 AM Christian Dietrich < > christian.dietr...@itemis.de> wrote: > >> Hello Wayne, >> >> thanks for that explanation. >> So we can use any libary in any

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can SLF4J be made the official logging API for Eclipse projects?

right out of the tool > (e.g., "mvn dependency:list"). FWIW, the tools that I referred to have > evolved from scripts that I've been using for a few months to map the > results from that dependency list to license and CQ information. I'll start > attaching the output from

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can SLF4J be made the official logging API for Eclipse projects?

e other things on the list are harder > > HTH, > > Wayne > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:07 AM Christian Dietrich < > christian.dietr...@itemis.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we (Xtext) currently have no capacity to do >> >> - the bureaucracy >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can SLF4J be made the official logging API for Eclipse projects?

Hi, we (Xtext) currently have no capacity to do - the bureaucracy - analyze impacts on logging customization points in Xtext - analyze who else uses what logging and how that change would affect them and indirectly us Regards Christian Am 23.01.20 um 15:05 schrieb Ed Willink: > > Hi > > If

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Use Milestones/RCs To Test and Run

Hi, I am actually using the latest platform but i did no see the specific bug with the .files as i have them visible in all workspaces so i wont see if its default or not. and i create new workspaces quite seldomly. the same is for the mylyn problem. i saw this but there was already a bug for

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems running Xtext and Buildship together

ons. > This way we could check that only one Guava version was able to > satisfy all dependencies. > > Cheers > Alexander > > >> Am 06.08.2019 um 09:08 schrieb Christian Dietrich >> mailto:christian.dietr...@itemis.de>>: >> >> this wont help if i

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems running Xtext and Buildship together

> Cheers, > Alexander > >> Am 06.08.2019 um 09:04 schrieb Christian Dietrich >> mailto:christian.dietr...@itemis.de>>: >> >> i used that product and it actually found 2 more problematic candidates >> >> gef dot - regarding guava >> and mylyn

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems running Xtext and Buildship together

pens as an > integrating system's class loader must 'choose' whether it uses 'left' > or 'right' hand class versions. > > If the 'API' is clean enough, e.g. no Optional, it can work. > >     Regards > >         Ed Willink > > On 06/08/2019 07:43, Christian Dietrich wr

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems running Xtext and Buildship together

Hi, this is more general the Problem with how to deal with the Update to Guava 27.1 in Eclipse 2019-09 - Guava 18 and 21 were dropped from Orbit - Xtext 2.19 + MWE 2.11 will (as Buildship 3.1.1+) use Guava 27.1 - Buildship has not contributed that version to simrel yet. i have opended a bug for

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] The end of an era: shell access.

you can find CBI Jenkinsfiles here: https://github.com/eclipse/xtext-lib/blob/master/CBI.Jenkinsfile https://github.com/eclipse/xtext-core/blob/master/CBI.Jenkinsfile https://github.com/eclipse/xtext-extras/blob/master/CBI.Jenkinsfile

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] The Eclipse IDE 2019-06 release is available now!

eclipse.org/releases/2019-06/ >>>>> >>>>> (http://download.eclipse.org/releases/latest also points to it) >>>>> >>>>> The EPP (all-in-one) packages are available at >>>>> >>>>>    https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/ >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

If this update site is configured: yes Am 18. Juni 2019, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Michael Keppler : > Am 18.06.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Christian Dietrich: > > This would only work if update site is changed > > The Xtext (SDK) feature contains an update site reference to > http://do

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

s quite unfortunate, but inconsistencies and annoyances do not > > justify a respin less than 24h before the GA. -1 from my side. > > > > On 18.06.19 16:25, Christian Dietrich wrote: > > > there is nothing super critical but rather inconsistencies and annoyances. > > &

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

there is nothing super critical but rather inconsistencies and annoyances. all of these could be circumvented by installing Xtext 2.18.0 from the Xtext release update site Am 18.06.19 um 15:57 schrieb Gunnar Wagenknecht: > Christian, > > Do you have a "bad impact" analysis if the release goes out

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release 2019-06 opt-in

hi wayne, mwe is 2.10.0 ~Christian Am 08.05.19 um 22:04 schrieb Wayne Beaton: > Greetings Simultaneous Release 2019-06 participants. > > Per our process, I have started to assemble the participants list for > 2019-06 . > > By way of reminder, the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [Bug 547338] Update to guava 24.1.1+ (fix CVE-2018-10237)

no it's not. its the same for all version that are not on orbit (=all > 21) but if there way already a thing we can consume from tycho it spares us work Am 16.05.19 um 14:16 schrieb Mickael Istria: > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:30 AM Dietrich, Christian < > christian.dietr...@itemis.de> wrote: >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [Bug 547338] Update to guava 24.1.1+(fix CVE-2018-10237)

We at Xtext are affected by this. And we align to the release Train although our RC1 is ususally the final release. And we have very very limited capacity to work on anything. The Problem is that we cannot estimate the work (testing, Adaption) and having support for the new Version only would

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] URGENT!! Re: The Eclipse IDE 2019-03 release is available now!

Hi, i am getting this from oomph now Fetching content.xml.xz from http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2019-03/201903201000/ ERROR: org.eclipse.equinox.p2.metadata.repository code=1002 Unable to read repository at http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2019-03. ERROR:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel 2019-03 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is available

Hi I see our builds failing with the same problem [INFO] Fetching content.xml.xz from http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2019-03/201903081000/ [ERROR] Failed to resolve target definition

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [epp-dev] Fwd: EPP Packages 2019-03 M3

   >     >     >   > > > > Regards, > Markus > > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 13:54, Christian Dietrich > mailto:christian.dietr...@itemis.de>> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > i dont see M3 here right now > > > https://downl

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] EPP Packages 2019-03 M3

https://download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2019-03/M3/content.jar does exist but it is not part of the composite Am 08.03.19 um 13:16 schrieb Christian Dietrich: > Hello all, > > https://download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2019-03/ does not > contain M3 > will

[cross-project-issues-dev] EPP Packages 2019-03 M3

Hello all, https://download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2019-03/ does not contain M3 will there be a RC1/Release. I am currently stucked with an OOmphed Eclipse Committers IDE with no package explorer and no ability to update Platform/JDT cause there is no M3 Thanks Christian

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] e(fx)clipse intends to drop from 2019-03

Hi, @Matthias will this affect Draw2d parts as well?Thanks Christian Am 01.02.19 um 19:29 schrieb Matthias Wienand: > Yes, GEF does depend on e(fx)clipse. I will try to catch up with the > discussions. I hope we can still deliver GEF via SimRel, but this does not > sound promising. > > Best

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Staging for SimRel 2019-03 Milestone 1 (M1) is complete

Hi, http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2019-03/ seems to contain epp packages but jdt and platform seem to be gone. ~Christian Am 17.01.19 um 20:25 schrieb Frederic Gurr: > Hi, > > As discussed in > https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg16368.html, > the SimRel

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Staging for SimRel 2019-03 Milestone 1 (M1) is complete

Hi, https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2019-03 contains the epp packages but jdt and platform seem to be gone. Thanks Christian Am 17.01.19 um 20:25 schrieb Frederic Gurr: > Hi, > > As discussed in > https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg16368.html, > the SimRel

  1   2   >