ed to reference your own audited copy.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 28/11/2023 15:19, Ed Merks via cross-project-issues-dev wrote:
It's better to use the common license feature (not how Oomph or EMF
are doing it with their own license feature) which is more historical...
I recently
activating after M2.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 01/08/2023 16:26, Jonah Graham via cross-project-issues-dev wrote:
Hi Pauline,
If you don't mind me asking, why disable Papyrus for a single release?
Can you ship the same version for 2023-09 as you did for 2023-06? Is
there something about
traditional use case.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/01/2023 21:02, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to raise to general awareness a technical proposal for
Platform and others, that I believe is worth progressively going
mainstream as it's a noticeable simplification to multiple
Hi
Indeed, but I think that some of us would like to know how +0.1.0 rather
than +1.0.0 became a major release with the result that Eclipse policies
that some of us have endeavoured to observe are just being torn to
shreds by the platform.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/01/2023 09
functionality; internal classes that, in the absence of a
suitable Facade, users have no alternative but to use for reasonable
purposes.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Hi
4.21 to 4.23 is two minor releases and only six months; nothing in terms
of a transition period.
It takes a change to 6.x to be two major releases.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 03/01/2023 14:24, Mickael Istria wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:12 PM Ed Willink wrote:
I
Ed Willink
On 03/01/2023 10:46, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hello,
The older version of CVS support seem to not be working any more with
newer Platform:
https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.team/issues/29#issuecomment-1369456296
. While there is clearly no intention
tor. I wonder if it is unfriendly to non-Eclipse users.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 12/12/2022 07:53, Ed Merks wrote:
Ed,
If you move to Tycho 3.0 and beyond, you need to read the release
notes, and this in particular:
https://github.com/eclipse-tycho/tycho/blob/master/RELEASE_NO
ild the latest platform build?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
e.g.
eclipse-tycho-version to allow in pom.xml
${eclipse-tycho-version}
${tycho-version}
so that 'lazy' developers do not have to keep diagnosing breakages?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 18/09/2022 18:38, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
This is not a bug in jetty but normal behavior.
You
-tycho-version to allow in pom.xml
${eclipse-tycho-version}
${tycho-version}
so that 'lazy' developers do not have to keep diagnosing breakages?
Regards
Ed Willink
[INFO] Fetching org.eclipse.core.resources_3.18.100.v20221004-0631.jar
fromhttps://download.eclipse.org/eclipse
is required?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
nd change builds for no obviously good reason.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 06/08/2022 07:13, Christian Dietrich wrote:
created
https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator/issues/444
Am 06.08.22 um 08:09 schrieb Andrey Loskutov:
*21:33:56* [
Willink
On 13/06/2022 08:18, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/1404 raised.
On further investigation this is a Phishing rather than Spam problem.
It appears that the 'provocative tail' is outside the traditional text
protected by the mail signature
that there are
some legitimate senders (e.g. the nextdoor.co.uk local social media
site) that Gmail seems to blacklist without providing any Spam clues;
not a good email supplier.)
Regards
Ed Willink
On 09/06/2022 20:41, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Surely the EF should ensure that EF messages do not contain
ZIPs and their origin could be
cached in the configuration.
Perhaps as a security check there could be a checksum of each plugin to
diagnose when an upgrade overwrites a plugin.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 11/06/2022 15:45, Michael Keppler wrote:
As Ed wrote, reverting was the only way
that requires a couple of
scrolling actions to reveal.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 09/06/2022 11:36, Arthur van Dorp wrote:
Hi Ed
Not sure those "tails" are to blame. They are actually meant for mail clients
and Gmail supports those:
https://developers.google.com/gmail/markup/actions
older because recent
Eclipse communications have a junk tail that predisposes them to be
treated as Spam.
Surely Eclipse should not be sending messages with such a provocative
junk tail?
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus soft
.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 06/05/2022 06:46, Christian Dietrich wrote:
i mean the milestone 2 jonah is talking about
Am 06.05.22 um 07:44 schrieb Andrey Loskutov:
m2? Do you mean p2? p2 is in the SDK, m2 not.
Am 6. Mai 2022 07:37:49 MESZ schrieb Christian Dietrich
:
i dont see m2
I'm very sure that our fine,
overworked, Eclipse-Foundation IT staff will not appreciate that
implication, nor suggestions that there is craziness and madness involved.
Let's please be nice with one another, even when we are frustrated...
Regards,
Ed
On 19.04.2022 10:08, Ed Willink wrote:
and a totally
unjustified vandalism.
The plan never considered a new-GIT + new-Wiki + old-Bugzilla option.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 18/04/2022 12:56, Ed Merks wrote:
Ed,
The fate of Bugzilla, Gerrit, git.eclipse.org.and wiki.eclipse.org was
announced to all committers:
https
resources.
Is there any long term Eclipse committer who actually wants this
Bugzilla vandalism?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 18/04/2022 00:51, Denis Roy wrote:
We'll address the issue via the HelpDesk issue below.
Agree though, we need some redirects or links at the very least.
Denis
On 2022-0
r have any bugs ever
again?
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubs
Hi
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=579584 raised to
re-instate antlr 3.2.0
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=579583 raised to
re-instate lpg.runtime.java
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/04/2022 16:35, Christian Dietrich wrote:
ok, i found some some orphans
guice 5
an oversight? Are there other contributions that have suffered
the same erroneous excclusion?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/04/2022 06:03, Christian Dietrich wrote:
@Jonah does this mean i deed to use 10 repos to get the sum of my
orbit deps?
i am getting
Error: Failed to resolve
by helping
the user. An alternate pull-down is easy and probably achieves the
intended change first time - takes a minute - half an hour later I can
inspect the result. Hacking jobs and scripts is not easy, almost
certainly some debugging to do, probably the start of a bad day.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 07/03/2022 08:43, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
To me it's all fairly magic. But I assume that somehow something gets
fetched from Maven Central since there is no ZIP to install as for
normal Eclipse add-ons and so no sources to help with debugging.
I cannot see anything in my pom.xml
3.6.3
Regards
Ed Willink
On 07/03/2022 08:09, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
Hi Christian,
I'm just curious but how do you test your code contributions if not
with a local build? Commit &
Hi
Ok
So let's have e.g. 3.8.5-pre-20220306 in the pull down list until
(perhaps one week) after 3.8.5 replaces it.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 06/03/2022 10:17, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
Hi Ed,
3.8.5 isn't released yet, so everyone has now the opportunity to test
their builds
Hi
3.8.5 isn't in the pull-down list for
https://ci.eclipse.org/ocl/job/ocl-branch-tests/configure
Regards
Ed Willink
On 06/03/2022 09:24, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
Tycho will soon require 3.8.5 due to crucial enhancements in the maven
API.
So I'd like to ask everyone to test
Hi
Thanks. The explanation reassures me.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 24/02/2022 15:18, Jonah Graham wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
Ouch!. It seems like these are manually maintained and so subject
to human fallibility.
Not "
latest-S is usually the most recent except just after a release when
latest-R may be later (unless a gratuitous S-build immediately followed
the R-build).
However multiple explicit references seems crazy especially when they
are so stale.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 24/02/2022 08:
Hi
For those needing to update: Orbit now has:
location="https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-S"/>
location="https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-R"/>
so there is no need to update ever again. Just rebuild.
R
.
For RC1, 6.17.1 and 0.28.1 will appear with just minor bug fixes.
This change should not affect anyone, apart from Wayne's stats, since
hopefully nobody has a tight version lower bound.
@Wayne: PMI pages already updated.
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses
://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=559532
If SLF4J is to be used, can someone please ensure that the platform is
fit for purpose and that there is a good tutorial on how to do really
boring logging.
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https
g practice that Orbit is not
transitively available in SimRel.
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-
merge. IMHO until the merge occurs, there was no reversion.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 08/01/2022 15:33, Jonah Graham wrote:
Hi Eike,
Actually CDO does depend on Mylyn, and therefore (until 2021-12) on CVS:
EMF CDO depends on EMF Compare's contribution:
org.eclipse.emf.cdo.compare
was it merged to
master? Why has it not yet been reverted?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 08/01/2022 05:25, Eike Stepper wrote:
@Jonah Thanks for re-enabling CDO!
@Kit How did you establish that CDO depends (possibly transitively) on
CVS? The bundle manifests of CDO do not contain anything
org.apache.logging.log4j
which could be a log4j2. It is unused in core and many Eclipse
configurations.
Please be precise.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 13/12/2021 19:33, Denis Roy wrote:
The CVE shows: Apache Log4j2
I would assume that is correct.
On 2021-12-13 14:31, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
org.apache.logging.log4j.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 13/12/2021 19:15, Denis Roy wrote:
How about I start:
title: *Eclipse and log4j vulnerability **(CVE-2021-442280)*
Here is the status of the various Eclipse Foundation projects, with
regards to CVE-2021-442280:
- Eclipse IDE 2021-12: *not vulnerable
,
org.eclipse.emf.common.ui, org.eclipse.pde.ui, org.eclipse.ui
AFAICT this thread requires no action in regard to org.apache.log4j.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 10/12/2021 18:46, Denis Roy wrote:
Hi Folks,
As you may be aware, an important vulnerability has been discovered in
log4j
If I recall, log4j
Hi
When we were on a yearly cadence, the last two releases was two years
which was kind of reasonable.
Now 2 years means 8 releases in order to accommodate the many users who
don't change frequently. 2 releases is far too few.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 19/11/2021 10:01, Frederic
.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 07/10/2021 07:57, Ed Merks wrote:
Hi,
To prevent such problems in the future, I strongly suggest that
EGit/JGit should be at +2 or better yet at +1 but definitely not +3.
This will also help with the scenario of making contributions so late
on the final day
whenever possible the status updates are much more
informative.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 09/08/2021 21:45, Denis Roy wrote:
I very much appreciate the sympathy and the support. In the end, the
Infra team can do better than this. We'll lick our wounds and go back
to the drawing
Hi Mikael
At least two projects are reporting what appears to be a GIT roll back
to a backup state.
The time of the outage is therefore less interesting than the time of
the backup state that determines what is, at least currently, lost.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/08/2021 13:11
Hi
With the new cadence, for many projects, M2 is the main/only milestone
so skipping it seems unwise.
I suggest a one week delay provided the infrastructure is back by Saturday.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/08/2021 12:54, Jonah Graham wrote:
Hi folks,
(cross posted to cross
Hi Sravan
In the absence of any clues from the IT team can you please identify the
time to which GIT / downloads have been rolled back so that we can all
be aware of what is, at least currently, lost at the EF.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/08/2021 06:36, Sravan K Lakkimsetti wrote
Hi
Same for OCL.
I pushed a branch commit that successfully refreshed everything on the
branch with the result that the IT team now need to resolve a merge of
the rolled back copy, the incremental backed up history and the post
'no-outage' changes.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/08
, mailing list postings.
(Your posting dated 2-Aug-2021 10:35 reached me half an hour ago. 11:30
UK time.)
August cross-project-dev postings do not yet appear in
https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/index.html
Regards
Ed Willink
On 02/08/2021 10:35, Ralph Soika
. We all pile in to catch up and hit problems and so create more
work for the busy team.
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cross-project-issues-dev
Hi
Me Too.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 22/07/2021 07:51, Ondrej Dockal wrote:
Hey everybody,
Do you happen to share the same issue as I do? I cannot log into
ci.eclipse.org/myProject <http://ci.eclipse.org/myProject> Jenkins
instance. Just simply throwing "Inval
Hi
The signer is down
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=574482
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cross-project-issues-dev
).
Movement of UI plugins to Java 11 was inconvenient but only affected the
IDE so it was at least consistent.
Now in 2021-06, org.eclipse.core.resources has moved to Java 11 making
standalone Java 8 usage of Eclipse much much harder than it was.
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has
Hi
Issue retracted. Sorry for the noise. (Unless someone else has missing
notifications too...)
Regards
Ed Willink
On 09/06/2021 15:23, Denis Roy wrote:
As mentioned in my response to your direct email to me, I've traced
emails and they are received by your mail server. I've
Hi
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=574103
Bugzilla notifications seem to be down again, consequently many
important Bug correspondences are getting lost just as RC2 comes to a
difficult climax.
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses
gn
policy has rippled, so I'll defer raising another Bugzilla pending
discussion here.
Regards
Ed Willink
[1] https://ci.eclipse.org/qvtd/job/qvtd-master/377/display/redirect
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267150
[3] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=466991
your breakage occurs with a new platform, I can only
suggest searching for the breaking commit and investigating.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 23/04/2021 12:02, Andrey Loskutov wrote:
Hi,
could anyone point me to recent changes in EMF / Ant / platform that could
cause emf.XSD2Java ant
lained how a not-unstable build has over 7000 fails.
You haven't explained why any not-unstable builds has any fails at all.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/04/2021 08:41, Sravan K Lakkimsetti wrote:
Hi Ed,
Here is the process we follow,
There are two steps in promotion.
1. Pro
e disc
space / confuse the community?
Why do any builds have any fails at all? Surely a test that fails is a
test that fails? In my code, if a test is proving problematic then I
raise a Bugzilla and comment out the test until a solution is found.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 16/04/2021
Hi
In the last couple of weeks OCL compatibility tests seem to be taking 25
to 50% longer, sometimes failing to complete within a once-generous timeout.
Is this a known phenomenon or do I need to search deep for a
Java/platform/EMF/OCL performance regression [1]?
Regards
Ed
for project relengs are the platform's gratuitous
removal of IPlatformRunnable, movement to Java 11 BREE coupled with
Tycho evolution. Equally troublesome are the almost six monthly
breakages of the EF IT infrastructure as service is 'improved'.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 26/03/2021 07
vintage BREEs in test plugins.
Inconsistent org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs between plugins can also be a
problem. Maybe OOMPH can avoid this.
If you use JDT's @NonNull annotations it is essential that you set
deriveReleaseCompilerArgumentFromTargetLevel false.
Regards
Ed Willink
Hi
The signer has failed. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=571754
Regards
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cross-project-issues-dev
HI
I use the copyright tool for MoDisco, OCL, QVTd, QVTo
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05/02/2021 17:07, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:00 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
mailto:akurt...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Question is about [1] being still used by anyone. I haven'
roduce an inconsistent mess.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/01/2021 19:10, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
Happy new year everyone,
I'd like to introduce a new feature in m2e / Tycho that supports the
seaming-less integration for maven artifacts (OSGi and even non OSGi
ones) to be used both in Eclip
-staging.eclipse.org/simrel.
Regards,
Fred
On 09.12.20 07:06, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
The normal
https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/shows
as disabled since Dec 4th so that just about all RC2 contributions are
blocked. This doesn't seem like waiting till RC2 is done
?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 08/12/2020 09:00, Frederic Gurr wrote:
Hi Jonah,
Thanks for the heads-up and sorry for the noise. The staging repo is
complete, but there was a permissions issue, that made the directories
not readable.
I will make sure that simrel.runaggregator.pipeline runs
that you used to, or that
some project no longer redistributes. IIRC Mylyn has been restructuring.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 01/12/2020 08:05, Ralph Soika wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of my plugins which is using the
javax.xml.bind packages to marshal and unmarshal xml classes
Hi
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=568144
raised for MoDisco to re-use BIRT chart via MAT.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 22/10/2020 16:54, Wayne Beaton wrote:
We have the same sort of arrangement with Eclipse Jetty. The
simultaneous release includes Jetty and it's included
with
Google; probably because VE has been erased (archived).
If you can identify the API breakage we can maybe persuade the platform
to revert.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 19/09/2020 14:59, Wim Jongman wrote:
Hi,
I see that all our wb features are in the release train, which can
rds
Ed Willink
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
ht
./
Since Java 8 is significantly faster [3], the platform needs to ensure
that its beyond Java 8 issues are isolated, e.g an old Jetty if Java 8,
a new Jetty if Java 11.
Regards
Ed Willink
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=56
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id
is an obvious check. Historically, the Microsoft Java
was a regular user hazard.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 23/03/2020 15:25, Daniel Megert wrote:
HI Matthias
> letting things (like Help) fail seems not very nice from the user’s
point of view. I would vote for requiring Java
Hi
My JIPPs are ok but I cannot log in to the MarketPlace. (The Login
'button' goes away and comes back on the same page without logging in.)
Regards
Ed Willink
On 23/03/2020 07:06, Ed Merks wrote:
FYI,
I've opened https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=561350
because
widely useful activities such as OOMPH, EMF and some
legacy projects.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password
SimRel P2 is critical.)
(As a modelling developer I might be expected to use the Modeling EPP,
but sadly I find that although ridiculously bloated, it lacks important
projects and includes one project that I find detrimental to my UX.)
Regards
Ed Willink
On 29/01/2020 08:21, Dietrich
Xtext, there will almost certainly be some new magic to ensure that
an Xtext application has a fallback Log4j logger rather than the default
NOP logger.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 25/01/2020 14:23, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 10:56 AM Ed Willink <mailto:e...@willink.me
on EGit or
mandating that users manually add Orbit to their Install sites?
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
is to
build an Xtext application with no log4j dependencies and see what happens.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 24/01/2020 08:06, Christian Dietrich wrote:
Hi,
we (Xtext) currently have no capacity to do
- the bureaucracy
- analyze impacts on logging customization points in Xtext
- analyze who
.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 23/01/2020 13:09, Hickman, Steve (AdvTech) wrote:
Log4j 1.x reached end of life in 2015. The documentation for it now
appears to have gone offline. There are some Eclipse projects (call
them L1 projects) that currently use Log4j 1.x directly rather than
SLF4J
Hi
The 'old' ci.eclipse.org seems to have gone down.
While trying to investigate weird failures that started yesterday [1], I
now get catastrophic start up [2].
Regards
Ed Willink
[1]
https://ci.eclipse.org/ocl/job/ocl-compatibility-2019-03/org.eclipse.ocl
. I
suspect that the actual problem might well be idiot user; disabling
auto-build or just not waiting long enough for all the time wasting
background activities such as Bug 544272 to complete before the editor
can refresh its markers usefully.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 17/12/2019 17
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=545211 have to wait 9
months until the platform team 'duplicates'.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 13/12/2019 10:23, Daniel Megert wrote:
It would be great if everyone could at least test or even better, run
on the latest milestone/RC. Platform
Ed Willink
On 10/12/2019 15:18, Camille Letavernier wrote:
Hi Jonah,
IIRC (from a few years ago :) ), one of the reasons to keep multiple
versions in the Simrel Composite was to support rollback. If you
updated e.g. from M1 to M2 and noticed that something's broken, you
can revert to M1
.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 10/12/2019 09:05, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hi Ed,
Thanks for bringing this.
I was actually waiting for the best opportunity to start discussing a
very related topic, but from a maintenance POV not a user one, and I
think this is a good one:
*What is the value
a move to require all usage
of org.eclipse.ui.startup to need signing off by the PMC and the
platform team.
(Oops, the usage of org.eclipse.ui.startup by a user contribution to
QVTo never got written out.)
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross
are for repo-name/feature range only and so are much
better done with a text editor.
Regards
Ed Willink
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=527164
On 08/12/2019 12:17, Stephan Herrmann wrote:
thanks for nagging :)
While we are at it, is anybody using validation from
HI
On 07/12/2019 09:39, Ed Merks wrote:
Therefore surely all BIRT features should be removed from all SimRel
categories?
I took the approach of minimizing the impact, leaving this charting
feature in the category. I think that's least disruptive at this point.
The BIRT chart feature
HI Ed
Yes the BIRT chart feature is all that MoDisco uses.
Looking at the residual aggrcon ...
"oxygen" is really vintage
"interim" is really smelly
It seems that BIRT has died and we are raking over its ashes.
Therefore surely all BIRT features should be removed from all SimRel
categories?
Hi
On 06/12/2019 17:38, Ed Merks wrote:
*Does BIRT removal affect anyone?*
Regards,
Ed
Yes. MoDisco has a model discovery from a BIRT chart.
Regards
Ed
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To
Hi
Shouldn't they just be moved to archive where archive composites give
access to the archives in just the same way as the normal composite for
normal contents, but avoiding the need to inflict the loading of vintage
material on normal users?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05/12/2019
Hi Eike
Great stuff.
You might care to generate warnings for not-latest repos that are more
than 5 years old on download.eclipse.org rather than archive.eclipse.org.
Regards
Ed
On 05/12/2019 07:51, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi Committers,
Every once in a while during my work I
on such commands is tediously slow because of
the one minute wait for an executor.
Regards
Ed Willink
[1] https://ci.eclipse.org/qvt-oml/job/shell/
On 05/12/2019 08:12, Arthur van Dorp wrote:
Hi Eike,
Thank you for the report. Is there an easy way (let's say per Jenkins job
HI Ed
Yes/No but certainly not often/constantly. I would say that for me it is
twice as often as I might expect as a consequence of running a 'cleaner'
or Firefox crashing. Do you have an overenthusiastic automated
'cleaner'? What is often for me is the need to keep logging in to
Jenkins,
Hi
Thanks, you must have fixed it. Everything started working again a few
minutes after your message.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 25/11/2019 09:29, Frederic Gurr wrote:
Hi,
I can access the *.eclipse.org services just fine at the moment (from
Germany).
I will keep an eye
will
progress as normal.
Regards
Ed Willink
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org
Hi
"move your bundle to newer BREE (highest BREE of deps)"
Seems like a good candidate for a MANIFEST.MF warning.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 17/10/2019 14:14, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Eclipse Platform starts using more and more new Java constructs (up to
Java 8 for now
HI
Some mistake surely?
"Only one(!)"
Both QVTd and QVTo are marked as RESOLVED FIXED.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 24/09/2019 16:39, Frederic Gurr wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately, there has been almost no progress on the migration of
JIPPs on hipp4: Only one(!) project ac
ot;>
location="https://download.eclipse.org/cbi/updates/license"/>
If you have your own license feature, just delete it.
Regards
Ed Willink
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
__
.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 02/09/2019 09:43, Ed Merks wrote:
Mickael,
Comments below.
On 02.09.2019 10:30, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hi Ed,
Some similar (yet different) reports already exist in
https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2019-09/201907191000/buildInfo/reporeports
and some
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
