Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If quantum computers make brute-force cryptanalysis tasks easier,
don't they also make brute-force cryptographic tasks easier as well?
At 01:12 AM 10/18/1999 -0400, Vin McLellan wrote:
The problem to worry about, of course, is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Aside from noting the vicious hypocrisy of the Clinton administration
saying they support the 11th Ammendment, I've also decided that the bill
mentioned in the New York Times Story excerpted below, like most current
state digital signature legislation, could
In message v0421012db4321dc2f55c@[204.167.101.62], Robert Hettinga writes:
The solution to this madness, is, of course, bearer credentials, as
Stephan Brands points out in his recently published doctoral dissertation
"Rethinking Public Key Infrastructures and Digital Certificates --
Evidently, there are only 500 in the first printing, but I bet Stefan
didn't give them *all* away. :-).
I bet that if you put in a special order to Amazon with the ISBN and
the publisher in it, they'll manage to sell one to you on order. Upon
receiving a bunch of orders for the book from some
Here's something I wrote two years ago that may be timely when evaluating
whether or not to trust the government. At least, that is, when police say
they'll not abuse wiretaps and backdoors inserted into Internet protocols.
-Declan
A couple of months ago, someone (unfortunately, I dont recall the name or date)
wrote to the New York Times, suggesting that all political contributions be made
anonymously.
Given the continuous contention that the issue of political contributions causes
in the US, I was intrigued by the
Thanks to Cindy Cohn we offer the USG's motion yesterday
to delay en banc reargument in Bernstein:
http://cryptome.org/bernstein-mot.htm
A quote:
"The revisions being implemented by the Department of
Commerce entail extensive changes in the existing terms
of the encryption export
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 07:41:34PM -0700, I wrote:
At 04:49 AM 9/29/99 , Donald Ramsbottom wrote:
What really intrigues me is the end of your post relating to the
distinction between object code and source code. So if I understand you
correctly, you will still require the old style regime
- Forwarded message from Greg Broiles -
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 15:13:53 -0700
From: Greg Broiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BXA
It appears that this may no longer be correct. John Young has made
available on his website a document
http://cryptome.org/bernstein-mot.htm filed by the
At 3:48 PM -0400 on 10/19/99, Reusch wrote:
"I contributed $100,000. Here is my receipt! Get the bedroom ready."
Right.
See http://www.xs4all.nl/~brands/order.txt
There's an echo in the room, isn't there?
:-).
Cheers,
RAH
-
Robert A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
Michael Reusch, [EMAIL PROTECTED], writes:
A couple of months ago, someone (unfortunately, I don't recall the name
or date) wrote to the New York Times, suggesting that all political
contributions be made anonymously.
Given the continuous contention that the issue of political
Robert Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evidently, there are only 500 in the first printing, but I bet Stefan
didn't give them *all* away. :-).
I bet that if you put in a special order to Amazon with the ISBN and
the publisher in it, they'll manage to sell one to you on order. Upon
Unless, of course, this quiet announcement (in the Bernstein court
papers filed by the US Govt) that the source code issue is currently being
reviewed within the Executive Branch -- despite White House assurances to
the contrary to leading Congressional figures -- was a purposely
For details of how to order, see www.xs4all.nl/~brands/order.txt
What is it about wanting to change the instantaneous electronic world
that generates this sort of time paper hazing ritual?
Yours in irreverent confusion,
Lightning Rod
At 9:20 AM +1000 10/20/99, Julian Assange wrote:
Robert Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evidently, there are only 500 in the first printing, but I bet Stefan
didn't give them *all* away. :-).
I bet that if you put in a special order to Amazon with the ISBN and
the publisher in it,
$94 for the $50 book from the US, ($19 shipping and bank costs on the
publisher's side, $25 for an "international money order").
Robert Hettinga wrote:
At 2:27 PM -0400 on 10/19/99, Somebody, at the head end of a long
line of other Sombodies, wrote:
Where can I get this book by Brands?
_Bernstein_ case. In short, the US Government is asking the court to
postpone oral argument in the case until the US Government has revealed
the new regulations, promised for release on December 15 1999.
Which shouldn't be relevant since his rights were impacted under the *old*
law. Even
John Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is possible that the revised regulations will not materially
change the treatment of source code. But it is also possible
that the revised regulations will alter the treatment of source
code in ways that could have a bearing on the constitutional
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider functions of one variable whose domain and range are both
{0,1,2,...,n-1}. There are n^n possible functions.
n!, I'd say, since the range of any function that isn't one-to-one is
_not_ {0..n-1}. Did you mean that the range was a subset of {0..n-1}? Or
19 matches
Mail list logo
