Re: Coerced decryption?

2000-02-14 Thread Ian BROWN
>Let's suppose that some stranger send me an unsolicited >document encrypted with a key different from mine: how am I supposed to >decrypt it? And can I really be thrown to jail for that?? Under the previous draft of the UK bill, yes -- see http://www.stand.org.uk/ for an amusing demonstration o

Re: Coerced decryption?

2000-02-13 Thread Niels Provos
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Horowitz writes: >else, ciphertext more than incrementally larger than plaintext is a >red flag), and will demand both documents. I could conceive of stego >which might permit this, since large expansion ratios are normal, but >if you're doing stego, and they'

Re: Coerced decryption?

2000-02-13 Thread Enzo Michelangeli
accepted. Enzo - Original Message - From: Marc Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 2:34 Subject: Re: Coerced decryption? > Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >&g

Re: Coerced decryption?

2000-02-11 Thread lcs Mixmaster Remailer
Russell Nelson writes: > Nobody's mentioned the possibility of an encryption system which > always encrypts two documents simultaneously, with two different keys: > one to retrieves the first (real) document, and the second one which > retrieves to the second (innocuous) document. This idea has b

Re: Coerced decryption?

2000-02-11 Thread Ben Laurie
Russell Nelson wrote: > > Caspar Bowden writes: > > And, as a result, the Bill proposes that the police or the security services > > should have the power to force someone to hand over decryption keys or the > > plain text of specified materials, such as e-mails, and jail those who > > refuse

Re: Coerced decryption?

2000-02-11 Thread Marc Horowitz
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Nobody's mentioned the possibility of an encryption system which >> always encrypts two documents simultaneously, with two different keys: >> one to retrieves the first (real) document, and the second one which >> retrieves to the second (innocuous) d

RE: Coerced decryption?

2000-02-11 Thread Kossmann, Bill
It's "deniable encryption." One link is: http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/home/naor/public_html/PAPERS/deniable_abs.h tml -Original Message- From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 10:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Coe

Coerced decryption?

2000-02-11 Thread Russell Nelson
Caspar Bowden writes: > And, as a result, the Bill proposes that the police or the security services > should have the power to force someone to hand over decryption keys or the > plain text of specified materials, such as e-mails, and jail those who > refuse. Nobody's mentioned the possibili