Hello,
I have had a look at Identity Based Encryption but I have not been able to
find out whether there are any protecting patents. It appears that the
breakthrough happend just two years ago with the work of Beneh and Franklin
[1] and there exist an open source implementation of their scheme
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 08:55:16PM -0800, Carl Ellison wrote:
IBM has started rolling out machines that have a TPM installed.
[snip ...]
Then again, TPMs cost money and I don't know any private individuals who are
willing to pay extra for a machine with one. Given that, it is unlikely
William Arbaugh writes:
If that is the case, then strong authentication provides the same
degree of control over your computer. With remote attestation, the
distant end determines if they wish to communicate with you based on
the fingerprint of your configuration. With strong
Amir Herzberg wrote:
Ben, Carl and others,
At 18:23 21/12/2003, Carl Ellison wrote:
and it included non-repudiation which is an unachievable,
nonsense concept.
Any alternative definition or concept to cover what protocol designers
usually refer to as non-repudiation
At 02:01 PM 12/23/2003 -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
If so, then I believe that we need a federated identity and management
infrastructure. The difference is that the third-party PKI enrollment
model still doesn't make sense, and organizations will take over their own
identity issues, as with SAML
At 11:18 AM 12/23/2003 +0200, Amir Herzberg wrote:
Any alternative definition or concept to cover what protocol designers
usually refer to as non-repudiation specifications? For example
non-repudiation of origin, i.e. the ability of recipient to convince a
third party that a message was sent
2) certificates were fundamentally designed to address a trust issue in
offline environments where a modicum of static, stale data was better
than nothing
How many years have you been saying this, now? :) How do those modern
online environments achieve end-to-end content integrity and privacy?
