On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:29:30AM +1000, silky wrote:
> A potentially amusing/silly solution would be to have one strong key
> that you change monthly, and then, encrypt *that* key, with a method
> that will be brute-forceable in 2 months and make it public. As long
> as you are constantly changi
On Jul 1, 2009, at 4:29 PM, silky wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Udhay Shankar N
wrote:
Udhay Shankar N wrote, [on 5/29/2009 9:02 AM]:
Fascinating discussion at boing boing that will probably be of
interest
to this list.
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/05/27/what-will-happen-to.htm
--
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:05 PM
Subject: MD6 withdrawn from SHA-3 competition
Also from Bruce Schneier, a report that MD6 was withdrawn from the SHA-3
competition because of performance considerations.
I find this disappointing. With th
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124648494429082661.html#mod=WSJ_myyahoo_module
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majord...@metzdowd.com
