Stefan Kelm wrote:
> Nicholas,
..
> There's another EU Diretive on "simplifying, modernising and harmonising
> the conditions laid down for invoicing in respect of value added tax".
>
>Invoices sent by electronic means shall be accepted
>by Member States provided that the authenticity
Nicholas,
>> Stefan is talking about Germany
>
> I realise that, but he said "Europe", so I felt a UK counter-example was
> in order!
Point taken. :) However, there are other countries w/ similar rules.
>> Qualified certificates are defined in the European Digital Signature
>> Directive, whi
Ian,
> Stefan is talking about Germany which has issued a plethora of
> recommendations, laws and what-not to "cause ecommerce to leap into
> life". Unfortunately, they did not understand, and electronic documents
> are much much harder to do in these environments, with no general added
> benefit
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm26.htm#60 crypto component services - is there
a market
slightly related discussion of x9.59 financial standard protocol
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/x959.html#x959
supporting hash of invoice in any dispute resolution ... thread from a couple
weeks ago
http
Stefan Kelm wrote:
>> Same with digital timestamping.
>
> Here in Europe, e-invoicing very slowly seems to be
> becoming a (or should I say "the"?) long-awaited
> application for (qualified) electronic signatures.
> Since electronic invoices need to be archived in
> most countries some vendors app
Ian,
> Hmmm... last I heard, qualified certificates can only be issued to
> individuals, and invoicing (of the e-form that the regulations speak)
> can only be done by VAT-registered companies.
True.
> Is that not the case? How is Germany resolving the contradictions?
By using pseudonyms withi
Stefan Kelm wrote:
Here in Europe, e-invoicing very slowly seems to be
becoming a (or should I say "the"?) long-awaited
application for (qualified) electronic signatures.
Since electronic invoices need to be archived in
most countries some vendors apply time-stamps and
recommend to re-apply time-
Stefan Kelm wrote:
Same with digital timestamping.
Here in Europe, e-invoicing very slowly seems to be
becoming a (or should I say "the"?) long-awaited
application for (qualified) electronic signatures.
Hmmm... last I heard, qualified certificates can only be
issued to individuals, and invo
> Same with digital timestamping.
Here in Europe, e-invoicing very slowly seems to be
becoming a (or should I say "the"?) long-awaited
application for (qualified) electronic signatures.
Since electronic invoices need to be archived in
most countries some vendors apply time-stamps and
recommend to
i am not sure what you mean by "crypto component services". Can you
please elaborate?
saqib
http://www.full-disk-encryption.net
On 4/16/07, Travis H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So back when I was reading about secure logging I thought it'd be
a fun service to offer, but it doesn't seem like a "
So back when I was reading about secure logging I thought it'd be
a fun service to offer, but it doesn't seem like a "product" that
the average business would be interested in; it seems more like
something that would be a component of a larger system, or used by
other systems.
Same with digital ti
11 matches
Mail list logo
