Hi Jake,
Ian Grigg just made a point on metzdowd that I think is true: if you
want to change the NSA, you need to address the many corporates that
profit from what they are doing. Because the chain goes like this:
corporate money - election campaigns - representatives - NSA
What do you think?
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Ralph Holz h...@net.in.tum.de wrote:
Hi Jake,
Ian Grigg just made a point on metzdowd that I think is true: if you
want to change the NSA, you need to address the [...]
[... money] Because the chain goes like this:
corporate money - election campaigns -
If you'll notice that both political parties have expanded on the NSA's
mission, scope, and probably funding. I doubt there are any business motives
here. In fact, it seems to me there are the exact opposite. Though, since much
of government is now contracted out, I do wonder who this was
Jake's, Assange's and others' emphasis at 30c3 was to pursue
technological offenses rather than futile expectation of political,
financial and legal controls of spying which inevitably confirm
what spies do, for it is in their interest to support spyin and
secrecy to maintain hegemonic,
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Ralph Holz h...@net.in.tum.de wrote:
Hi Jake,
Ian Grigg just made a point on metzdowd that I think is true: if you
want to change the NSA, you need to address the many corporates that
profit from what they are doing. Because the chain goes like this:
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 7:22 AM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Ralph Holz h...@net.in.tum.de wrote:
Hi Jake,
Ian Grigg just made a point on metzdowd that I think is true: if you
want to change the NSA, you need to address the [...]
[... money] Because the
