The original Cypherpunks mailing list seems dead.
Is there any list that it's successor?
--
Tony Arcieri
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
Yeah but that is basically zero traffic, and I suspect in large part because
its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their addition to a
watch-list will avoid.
Maybe someone with a more neutral domain could try it - or a cypherpunks.*
domain if they have a listserv handy.
Adam
On
Ever since Microsoft bought the company, these rumors have been floating around.
I have yet to see any real evidence. Here are the two best articles I've seen:
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/25/technology/microsoft-inherits-sticky-data-collection-issues-from-skype.html
On 23 March 2013 16:21, danimoth danim...@cryptolab.net wrote:
On 21/03/13 at 03:07am, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Linux has not warmed up to the fact that userland needs help in
storing secrets from the OS.
http://standards.freedesktop.org/secret-service/
but maybe I have misunderstood your
Paul Walker p...@blacksun.org.uk writes:
I'm curious which bits you feel Apple got right with the Keychain - not
because I disbelieve you, but because I don't know. :-) Have you got any
links or documents, either for what they did right or for what the others do
wrong?
Link sent off-list.
danimoth wrote:
On 21/03/13 at 03:07am, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Linux has not warmed up to the fact that userland needs help in
storing secrets from the OS.
http://standards.freedesktop.org/secret-service/
but maybe I have misunderstood your statement.
On 25/03/13 16:51 PM, Thierry Moreau wrote:
Security by management exhaustion (the time we discuss this vs others ...).
We need a committee! They're inexhaustible!
iang
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
miTLS is a verified reference implementation of the TLS
protocolhttp://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246.
Our code fully supports its wire formats, ciphersuites, sessions and
connections, re-handshakes and resumptions, alerts and errors, and data
fragmentation, as prescribed in the RFCs; it
[Posted to list only]
On 2013-03-25, at 8:02 AM, Peter Gutmann pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
Another nice thing Apple have done, which no-one else has
managed so far, is to get people to actively use the Keychain API and
capabilities.
I just looked in my login (default) OS X Keychain for
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +0100, Moritz wrote:
On 25.03.2013 09:25, Adam Back wrote:
because its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their
addition to a watch-list will avoid.
Isn't exactly that a nice property of a cypherpunks list?
No it is not, it is a way to
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:50:18PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
Isn't exactly that a nice property of a cypherpunks list?
No it is not, it is a way to persuade people to leave, or not join the
listserv.
We have to agree to disagree on that one. A 'punk' of any
kind will tend to thumb his nose at
Cyberpunk, cypherpunk, coderpunks... is all fine, I think people have
understood the etymology of those terms after a few decades, negative
connotations to some of 'punk' notwithstanding, a cypherpunk is a term for
an area of interest or philosophy with a dictionary definition at this
point.
But
Well then start one up and show us how it's done Adam. Put your money where
your mouth is.
Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +0100, Moritz wrote:
On 25.03.2013 09:25, Adam Back wrote:
because its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting
Speaking as one of the two people who started that particular effort, it never
quite worked out that way.
Way too many TLAs, law suits, IRS visits, and those who read their own press
releases to make it nearly as enjoyable as it sounds.
Moritz mor...@headstrong.de wrote:
On 25.03.2013
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
Yeah but that is basically zero traffic, and I suspect in large part because
its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their addition to a
watch-list will avoid.
i like it. waiting for the day they accept
* Adam Back schrieb am 2013-03-25 um 09:25 Uhr:
Maybe someone with a more neutral domain could try it - or a
cypherpunks.* domain if they have a listserv handy.
Our local hackerspace uses a rather neutral address:
URL:https://list.lstsrv.org/
We could also host the Cypherpunks list, if you
I just created a new mailman list
https://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptopolitics
as a venue for discussions that would normally go to cypherpunks but
hasn't because of the name or spam or whatever reason, and which
are off topic for this list so haven't happened here.
As with this
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 07:03:04PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
But my point actually was b...@al-qaeda.net??? Come on that is watch list
Of course it is pure watch list bait. That's the point.
bait and an invitation NOT to join list blah, whatever it is about.
If you think it's a deterrent,
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 21:28 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 07:03:04PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
But my point actually was b...@al-qaeda.net??? Come on that is watch list
Of course it is pure watch list bait. That's the point.
bait and an invitation NOT to join list
On 2013-03-26 6:21 AM, Jack Lloyd wrote:
I just created a new mailman list
https://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptopolitics
as a venue for discussions that would normally go to cypherpunks but
hasn't because of the name or spam or whatever reason, and which
are off topic for this list
2013/3/25 James A. Donald jam...@echeque.com
You don't have cryptopolitics unless the government is trying to ban
stuff. Current bans focus on bitcoins and file sharing.
To politics there is more than the destructive side.
___
cryptography mailing
Lodewijk andré de la porte l...@odewijk.nl wrote:
To politics there is more than the destructive side.
That is the funniest thing I've read in a long while.
You sir don't have a drop of Cypherpunk blood in your body.
--
-- -- -- --
Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus
jamescho...@austin.rr.com
Can we slowly move back to crypto on this list, and discuss politics and
cypherpunk or whatever definitions on the new one?
On 26.03.2013 06:19, James A. Donald wrote:
Politics is collective decision making. Cypherpunk is opposed to
collective decision making.
Definition of POLITICS
Actually, you're both wrong. Politics is a coping strategy we inherited from
our social ancestors, nothing scientific or intelligent about it - it's an
emotional behavior.
24 matches
Mail list logo
