On 6/16/14, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
The revelation that a crypto company was patenting a backdoor in an
international standard is indeed faith-shattering. Details aside...
Tanja Lange points out that the original filing by Certicom covered both
escrow and anti-escrow. Oh, my, how
On 15/06/2014 14:37 pm, Stephen Farrell wrote:
I've no public opinion on Certicom's patent practices. And the
behaviour of the signals intelligence agencies has been IMO
deplorable. So I sympathise with some of what you are saying.
However, building your case on bogus claims that are not
On 15/06/14 19:16, ianG wrote:
For my part, I had seen his name only with respect to IETF WGs. However
I admit that I do not follow IETF security WGs closely, so am not
qualified to assert highly active. You are right, I am wrong.
Thanks for that refreshing approach!
I appreciate it,
At 02:29 PM 6/15/2014, two wrote:
On 15/06/14 19:16, ianG wrote:
You are right, I am wrong.
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Thanks for that refreshing approach!
This is faith shattering. Somebody is lying, maybe everbody. Ah,
Worldwide Elder Abuse Avoidance Day by Obama proclamation:
America must
