Re: [cryptopp-users] Difference in behavior of Crypto850 build on Windows and non-Windows
> The OldRandomPool class provides an endian-swapped value. I'm not sure why. > > To fix it, we checked in this change: > https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/7101e9e73a66. This should fix the problem completely using the old Crypto++ 5.4 version of GenerateWord32: https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/fabd88e4e47b . We tracked this change at https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/1048 . Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cryptopp-users/CAH8yC8kES0dxnUFWK6opDEppmztRwiAmRKdcZX1UxMU1ZrKO3g%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [cryptopp-users] Difference in behavior of Crypto850 build on Windows and non-Windows
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 6:38 AM Vinay Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Thanq.
> >
> > Here is the code snippet(tested with sample application):
> >
> > unsigned char temprpl[4] = { '\0' };
> > unsigned __int32 Value = 3957804565;
> > CryptoPP::RandomPool vRandPool;
> >
> > memset((CryptoPP::byte *), 0, 4);
> > memcpy((CryptoPP::byte *), (CryptoPP::byte *), 4);
> >
> > cout << "VALUE=" << Value << endl;
> >
> > vRandPool.Put( reinterpret_cast(), sizeof(Value) );
> > /* For Crypto++ 5.4 */
> > // vRandPool.IncorporateEntropy( (const CryptoPP::byte *), 4 ); /*
> > For Cryptopp850 */
> >
> > CryptoPP::word32 t1 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
> >
> > cout << "FIRST RAND=" << t1 << endl;
> >
> > CryptoPP::word32 t2 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
> >
> > cout << "SECOND RAND=" << t2 << endl;
> >
> > CryptoPP::word32 t3 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
> >
> > cout << "THIRD RAND=" << t3 << endl;
> >
> > With Crypto++ 5.4 it always returns 'fixed RAND' values for specific
> > 'Value' as follows:
> >
> > VALUE=3957804565
> > FIRST RAND=123224688
> > SECOND RAND=3565820466
> > THIRD RAND=2141184933
> >
> >
> > VALUE=15201583
> > FIRST RAND=2446881748
> > SECOND RAND=653021931
> > THIRD RAND=31285341
> >
> > VALUE=1947237586
> > FIRST RAND=4090363092
> > SECOND RAND=1687243401
> > THIRD RAND=1878929729
> >
> > But, with Cryptopp850, it returns 'different RAND' values(and it is
> > different for every run). This is causing issues after upgrading to
> > Cryptopp850.
> > This change in behavior is observed only on Windows platform and it works
> > perfectly fine on Linux.
> >
> > Do you think it is a bug? Any workaround or other solution available to
> > resolve this problem.
OK, I had some time to do some digging. Here's what Crypto++ 5.4
prints out in hex:
$ ./test.exe
VALUE=3957804565
FIRST RAND=7584270
SECOND RAND=d48a1a32
THIRD RAND=7f9fe3a5
The OldRandomPool class provides an endian-swapped value. I'm not sure why.
To fix it, we checked in this change:
https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/7101e9e73a66.
Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cryptopp-users/CAH8yC8njUw58yBCHK%3DiLHFJa%2Bgj3kVJeK8EP49%3DYprSj8kH0Cw%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [cryptopp-users] Difference in behavior of Crypto850 build on Windows and non-Windows
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 6:38 AM Vinay Kumar wrote:
>
> Thanq.
>
> Here is the code snippet(tested with sample application):
>
> unsigned char temprpl[4] = { '\0' };
> unsigned __int32 Value = 3957804565;
> CryptoPP::RandomPool vRandPool;
>
> memset((CryptoPP::byte *), 0, 4);
> memcpy((CryptoPP::byte *), (CryptoPP::byte *), 4);
>
> cout << "VALUE=" << Value << endl;
>
> vRandPool.Put( reinterpret_cast(), sizeof(Value) );
> /* For Crypto++ 5.4 */
> // vRandPool.IncorporateEntropy( (const CryptoPP::byte *), 4 ); /*
> For Cryptopp850 */
>
> CryptoPP::word32 t1 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
>
> cout << "FIRST RAND=" << t1 << endl;
>
> CryptoPP::word32 t2 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
>
> cout << "SECOND RAND=" << t2 << endl;
>
> CryptoPP::word32 t3 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
>
> cout << "THIRD RAND=" << t3 << endl;
>
> With Crypto++ 5.4 it always returns 'fixed RAND' values for specific 'Value'
> as follows:
>
> VALUE=3957804565
> FIRST RAND=123224688
> SECOND RAND=3565820466
> THIRD RAND=2141184933
>
>
> VALUE=15201583
> FIRST RAND=2446881748
> SECOND RAND=653021931
> THIRD RAND=31285341
>
> VALUE=1947237586
> FIRST RAND=4090363092
> SECOND RAND=1687243401
> THIRD RAND=1878929729
>
> But, with Cryptopp850, it returns 'different RAND' values(and it is different
> for every run). This is causing issues after upgrading to Cryptopp850.
> This change in behavior is observed only on Windows platform and it works
> perfectly fine on Linux.
>
> Do you think it is a bug? Any workaround or other solution available to
> resolve this problem.
For Crypto++ 8.5 (or anything greater than Crypto++ 5.5), you should
use OldRandPool instead of RandPool if you want the old behavior.
Actually OldRandPool was added at Crypto++ 6.0, so it is available for
Crypto++ 6.0 and above.
OldRandPool should work for you out of the box. We have a test for it
using data generated by Crypto++ 5.4. Also see
https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/validat3.cpp#L633 .
If the OldRandPool is not returning correct results for you, then
copy/paste Crypto++ 5.4 RandPool into Crypto++ 8.5. Rename the class
to something like LegacyRandPool or FixedOldRandPool, and then use it
instead.
Also see the head notes at
https://www.cryptopp.com/docs/ref/randpool_8h.html, and the docs at
https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/OldRandomPool.
Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cryptopp-users/CAH8yC8m5Of65ZW9AeVcxQ2qEKoOzXPp9sTydFhjnaDLKhuoGQw%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [cryptopp-users] Difference in behavior of Crypto850 build on Windows and non-Windows
Thanq.
Here is the code snippet(tested with sample application):
unsigned char temprpl[4] = { '\0' };
unsigned __int32 Value = 3957804565;
CryptoPP::RandomPool vRandPool;
memset((CryptoPP::byte *), 0, 4);
memcpy((CryptoPP::byte *), (CryptoPP::byte *), 4);
cout << "VALUE=" << Value << endl;
vRandPool.Put( reinterpret_cast(), sizeof(Value) );
/* For Crypto++ 5.4 */
// vRandPool.IncorporateEntropy( (const CryptoPP::byte *), 4 ); /*
For Cryptopp850 */
CryptoPP::word32 t1 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
cout << "FIRST RAND=" << t1 << endl;
CryptoPP::word32 t2 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
cout << "SECOND RAND=" << t2 << endl;
CryptoPP::word32 t3 = vRandPool.GenerateWord32();
cout << "THIRD RAND=" << t3 << endl;
With Crypto++ 5.4 it always returns 'fixed RAND' values for specific
'Value' as follows:
VALUE=3957804565
FIRST RAND=123224688
SECOND RAND=3565820466
THIRD RAND=2141184933
VALUE=15201583
FIRST RAND=2446881748
SECOND RAND=653021931
THIRD RAND=31285341
VALUE=1947237586
FIRST RAND=4090363092
SECOND RAND=1687243401
THIRD RAND=1878929729
But, with Cryptopp850, it returns 'different RAND' values(and it is
different for every run). This is causing issues after upgrading to
Cryptopp850.
This change in behavior is observed only on Windows platform and it works
perfectly fine on Linux.
Do you think it is a bug? Any workaround or other solution available to
resolve this problem.
On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 1:41:28 PM UTC+5:30 Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > We are migrating from Crypto-5.4 to Crypto850.
> > Changes have been made to support the newer version(Crypto850).
> > On Linux, it works fine. But on Windows, we are facing issues.
> > We are using Visual Studio 2013 to build the cypto library(using
> cryptest.sln).
> > There is no source code difference between Linux and Windows.
> > The same source code works fine if it is rebuilt with Crypto-5.4.
> > Only major change done is to replace Randpool.Put with
> Randpool.IncorporateEntropy
> >
> > And also, using OldRandPool instead of RandPool works fine.
> >
> > Any Idea on how to resolve this problem?
>
> Also see https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/OldRandomPool for documentation
> on OldRandomPool.
>
> > One more observation is that on building manually(without using
> cryptest.sln) and using the library, it is found to crash at randpool.cpp:39
>
> For custom Crypto++ builds, the Nmake makefile might be useful to you.
> It is easier to change build flags using Nmake makefile. Also see
> https://cryptopp.com/wiki/Nmake_(Command_Line) .
>
> Jeff
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cryptopp-users/1f067e21-9096-4940-990b-4f9cc9061f1bn%40googlegroups.com.
Re: [cryptopp-users] Difference in behavior of Crypto850 build on Windows and non-Windows
> We are migrating from Crypto-5.4 to Crypto850. > Changes have been made to support the newer version(Crypto850). > On Linux, it works fine. But on Windows, we are facing issues. > We are using Visual Studio 2013 to build the cypto library(using > cryptest.sln). > There is no source code difference between Linux and Windows. > The same source code works fine if it is rebuilt with Crypto-5.4. > Only major change done is to replace Randpool.Put with > Randpool.IncorporateEntropy > > And also, using OldRandPool instead of RandPool works fine. > > Any Idea on how to resolve this problem? Also see https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/OldRandomPool for documentation on OldRandomPool. > One more observation is that on building manually(without using cryptest.sln) > and using the library, it is found to crash at randpool.cpp:39 For custom Crypto++ builds, the Nmake makefile might be useful to you. It is easier to change build flags using Nmake makefile. Also see https://cryptopp.com/wiki/Nmake_(Command_Line) . Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cryptopp-users/CAH8yC8mx1uWQ9%2B%2BuyRAWgUtLiE8QA1hA%2B2Qm-V%2BB6X6oT0tchA%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [cryptopp-users] Difference in behavior of Crypto850 build on Windows and non-Windows
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 2:59 AM Vinay Kumar wrote: > We are migrating from Crypto-5.4 to Crypto850. > Changes have been made to support the newer version(Crypto850). > On Linux, it works fine. But on Windows, we are facing issues. > We are using Visual Studio 2013 to build the cypto library(using > cryptest.sln). > There is no source code difference between Linux and Windows. > The same source code works fine if it is rebuilt with Crypto-5.4. > Only major change done is to replace *Randpool.Put* with > > *Randpool.IncorporateEntropy*And also, using OldRandPool instead of > RandPool works fine. > > *Any Idea on how to resolve this problem?* > > *One more observation is that on building manually(without using > cryptest.sln) and using the library, it is found to crash at > randpool.cpp:39* > So it sounds like you have two problems. I can't really tell what the first problem is. Can you provide a reproducer, please. The second problem is a crash when you run a program using Randpool. You have no provided details, like how you built the library or how to reproduce the problem. Can you setup a GitHub repo with the source files and the steps to reproduce the problem, please? Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cryptopp-users/CAH8yC8mRbxsygbD74OfLJRqFYgyf%2B6OJe8nN%2By%2BfK71Fb-qGjg%40mail.gmail.com.
