Upon further investigation, a simpler page works in Safari. So now my
question is what's the difference?
https://tomliv.com/css-d/svg-clip/index.html
https://tomliv.com/css-d/svg-clip/test.html
Thanks!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tom Livingston
Date: Tue,
Just curious, why max-width instead of width since its 100% it seems
unnecessary. Also the svg has width height set to 0 - any particular
reason for that?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Thanks Larry. I am using the -webkit prefix. After further poking
Hey Tom-
Could this be your issue:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41860477/why-doesnt-css-clip-path-with-svg-work-in-safari
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:51 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Upon further investigation, a simpler page works in Safari. So now my
> question is what's
Thanks Larry. I am using the -webkit prefix. After further poking around I
found that if I make the images parent or parent’s parent position fixed,
it shows correctly but in an odd place ( not that fixed is gonna work for
me anyway) and if I take the width off the image parent I see the image and
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:13 PM Philippe Wittenbergh
wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:10, Tom Livingston wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone tell me why the following isn't working in Safari but works in
> > FF and Chrome (all 3 are current versions)?
>
> I’ve no
> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:10, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me why the following isn't working in Safari but works in
> FF and Chrome (all 3 are current versions)?
I’ve no idea why it does not work (while it seemingly works in your simplified
example).
But I’m
Both width and max-width of 100% is unnecessary, you are right. I think
it’s a left over from grabbing at straws. The dimensions on the svg was
something I saw on an example by Sara Soueidan. It also keeps it from
taking up space in the layout. Keep in mind the svg is for a clippath, not
an image
Also, adding dimensions to the svg didn’t help.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:59 PM Tom Livingston wrote:
> Both width and max-width of 100% is unnecessary, you are right. I think
> it’s a left over from grabbing at straws. The dimensions on the svg was
> something I saw on an