On 6/18/05, Helmut HG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also thank you for your tips and comments. the main navigation will be
actual graphics and that is why I havent used a list.
Why not? :)
liaimg/a/li is just fine.
Could you elaborate a little more about the difference between XML foo/
and HTML
To Ingo, and anyone else who is interested:
I have provided another example to test this out, viz:
#tester{
padding : 50px;
width : 500px;
border : 5px solid #ff;
font: 14px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
color: #ff;
[/*IE*/] width: 610px;
[/*IE*/] border :
Ben Shamsian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On browsers other than IE however the inner div stays at 100% of
its parent content div. Which is the correct behavior?
The inner div should remain at 100% of #content. Static block layout is
done with respect to parent element. IE is wrong.
You will
On 18 Jun 2005, at 9:55 pm, Andrew Clover wrote:
No, the validator is quite right.
[/*IE*/] width: 610px;
The /*comment*/ is fine, but CSS does not allow you to arbitrarily
insert square brackets into the middle of a ruleset.
Based on CSS2.0 rec, the validator is right. (and the
Hi all,
Sorry if the subject was not descriptive enough as I Have no idea what
to call the bug.
I am having a problem with IE, of course, and I can not seem to figure
out why. I have narrowed my code down to a bare minimum to rule out
errors I may have caused. I have validated the code. You
Sean Montgomery wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry if the subject was not descriptive enough as I Have no idea what
to call the bug.
I am having a problem with IE, of course, and I can not seem to figure
out why. I have narrowed my code down to a bare minimum to rule out
errors I may have caused. I have
Thank you a lot. Although now I feel like I wasted everyones time.
Sorry, I did not see that write up last night. Thanks again.
Sean
On 6/18/05, Gary Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean Montgomery wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry if the subject was not descriptive enough as I Have no idea what
David Dorward, you advised Helmut to use em font size on body. I've wrestled
with an IE bug that is triggered by this, and I know from frustrating
experience that it's a bad idea. I quote a recent post by David Laakso:
Avoid using em on the body
as it triggers a font-re-sizing bug in IE.
Hi Philippe and all,
Interestingly, all the declarations are honoured on a PC in IE5.5, IE6,
FF1, Opera 8, Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0)
Gecko/20020530.
. . . ?
Bob
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Of course, the 3 previous declarations are invalid and should be
If you have access to IE and you would be so kind as to look at
http://debiansystem.info, I would appreciate if you could help me
figure out why the navigational tabs across the page hang into the
bar underneath. http://plone.org does it right, there the lia
tabs representing the navigational tabs
Hi,
I have this page (http://www.luktown.org/gawdam/games.html) and this css
(http://www.luktown.org/gawdam/gawdam.css ).
I'm having a problem in IE (I know, it's weird to have problems with IE ;) ) .
I'm assuming it's because of the #topnav div being postition:fixed.
The #topnav is
This p element in hover state thing
http://www.dlaakso.com/sandbox/p-hover.html is 'close, but no cigar' in
compliant browsers, and not working at all in IE.
css:
p a, p:link, p:hover, a, a:link, a:hover { background-color:
#9ACD32/*green*/; color: #000; text-decoration: none; }
p:hover,
On 6/18/05, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This p element in hover state thing
http://www.dlaakso.com/sandbox/p-hover.html is 'close, but no cigar' in
compliant browsers, and not working at all in IE.
Well, IE only supports :hover on anchors unless you use the famous
JavaScript
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:44:40 +0200, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This p element in hover state thing
http://www.dlaakso.com/sandbox/p-hover.html is 'close, but no cigar'
in compliant browsers, and not working at all in IE.
css:
p a, p:link, p:hover, a, a:link, a:hover {
On 18 Jun 2005, at 10:53 pm, Andrew Clover wrote:
If you want to get shrink-to-fit elements on browsers that don't
support CSS 2.1/auto-width-float, the only other documented way is a
table (with table-layout: auto, the default). Which probably wouldn't
be much use with positioned menus.
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:44:40 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: [css-d] p:hover:
Many thanks to all who replied and offered suggestions!
As Lauri, suggested adding display block fixed IE6.0, and resolved issues
in XP_SP2 FF1.0.4, and Moz1.7.8, as well.
p a, p:link, p:hover, a,
From: Holly Bergevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The URI is: http://www.dlaakso.com/sandbox/p-hover.html
David, as long as you hover the text and not part of the paragraph that has no
text in it, all the IEs are fine and work as you want. IE5.5 appears to allow
hovering over the paragraph area even if
17 matches
Mail list logo
