Re: [css-d] z-index doesn't work with relative items in FF?

hi > I just wish I could figure out if a) FF is sticking to the > letter of the > W3C description (which is illogical) or b) FF is actually > incorrect and > IE is correct for once. I haven't looked at the example, but I would be willing to bet a fairly substantial sum on the former :) The i

[css-d] horz nav bar in IE5Mac / site check Windows

Hi all (aka: my saviors...), I've spent all weekend reading Dan Cederholm's excellent book 'Bulletproof Web Design", and was following the general idea in Chapter 2 for a scalable nav bar for my latest volunteer site: CSS at

[css-d] fluid layout fixed...sort of

Hi all I ended up using a table inside my content div...that allowed the content to grow and the footer to clear the two divs (side menu and content). When I was trying to use just divs to arrange content, the footer would not clear. So back to the strange old days of using tables for layout...

Re: [css-d] z-index doesn't work with relative items in FF?

I've been looking at position and z-index in the specs. And I have a theory. However it doesn't seem right, but the facts seem to fit. I think that IE is painting the scene back to front like the painters algorithm, but FF paints the scene back to front by element branch. So the drop down is

Re: [css-d] sitecheck / lists equal in ie+ff

On Nov 9, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Mauricio Giraldo Arteaga wrote: > I just finished a mainly CSS site: > http://www.museoarqueologico.com > It's not 100% valid since it uses Flash. > Any comments will be appreciated. Nice site! Looks good. I thought I would comment on Flash and a few techniques on how

Re: [css-d] Flickering in Firefox: the saga continues

bill wrote: >Anyone else seeing the flicker in FF? > >The page, which validates, is at http://www.first-encounter-design.com > >The styles at http://www.first-encounter-design.com/css/main.css >Bill Scheider > > No flicker. ff1.07 moz1.7.12 xp_sp2 ~dL ___

[css-d] IE Print Margins

Is there a way to set the print margins in Internet Explorer (6+)? I don't like the preset margins ... like FireFox better but have to make it work in IE. Thx in advance for your guidance '-) __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: [css-d] Flickering in Firefox: the saga continues

bill wrote: > Anyone else seeing the flicker in FF? > http://www.first-encounter-design.com Firefox 0.8 and Moz 1.4 & 1.7.12 = flicker, as before. Firefox 1.5RC1 = fine. Adding #wrapper {display: table;} ...no flickering in any of them. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no __

[css-d] win/ie5x

I have given up getting this page right in win/ie5x. It does not need to be pixel perfect. A /little/ closer to 6.0 would be great. css (not for the faint of heart): Thanks. ~dL

Re: [css-d] layout does not work the same in NS and IE

Thomas, The to fix the IE double margin bug, in your block_1 div change display: block (which is not needed) to display: inline. To read more about this bug and many others read everything at: http://www.positioniseverything.net/ and on the wiki for this list: http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ J

Re: [css-d] test page check - especially mac

Virtuallee wrote: >Just wondering if someone could do a site check for me? >http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/index_test.html >Lee > Lee, I get an insignificant 3px difference from the top of the azure blue to bottom of the toolbar comparing IE/FF in Xp Very nice, clean simple layout. Bit difficu

Re: [css-d] Styling COL and COLGROUP

On 10 Nov 2005, at 11:13 am, James Bennett wrote: > > I once read through a long and protracted Mozilla bug report on this > which I'm currently unable to locate; IIRC the problem, conceptually, > is that individual table cells are not actually children of the > COLGROUP or COL; as a result, they

Re: [css-d] Styling COL and COLGROUP

On 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't hardly ever use these tags but I found they came in handy in my > current assignment. However, in IE (not my favorite browser but I have > to admit it's doing what I want to in this instance) everything > displayed the way I intuiti

[css-d] layout does not work the same in NS and IE

I am new to CSS and am having trouble getting css to work consistently in different browsers. The page is real close to what I want, but when the display's width is reduced in IE(v6) the area around the table creates a large gap. This does not happen in NS(v8). A lesser question i

Re: [css-d] test page check - especially mac

Virtuallee wrote: > Hi > > Just wondering if someone could do a site check for me? > > http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/index_test.html > > It's displaying fine in IE, but the middle blue area is slightly too > high in Firefox. Can't seem to figure this out! > Also, I don't have a mac so would so

Re: [css-d] Styling COL and COLGROUP

> > I don't hardly ever use these tags but I found they came in handy in my > > current assignment. However, in IE (not my favorite browser but I have > > to admit it's doing what I want to in this instance) everything > > displayed the way I intuitively imagined it would after adding style > >

[css-d] test page check - especially mac

Hi Just wondering if someone could do a site check for me? http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/index_test.html It's displaying fine in IE, but the middle blue area is slightly too high in Firefox. Can't seem to figure this out! Also, I don't have a mac so would someone with a mac let me know how

Re: [css-d] Styling COL and COLGROUP

On 10 Nov 2005, at 9:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't hardly ever use these tags but I found they came in handy in my > current assignment. However, in IE (not my favorite browser but I have > to admit it's doing what I want to in this instance) everything > displayed the way I intuitive

[css-d] Styling COL and COLGROUP

I don't hardly ever use these tags but I found they came in handy in my current assignment. However, in IE (not my favorite browser but I have to admit it's doing what I want to in this instance) everything displayed the way I intuitively imagined it would after adding style rules to these two

Re: [css-d] Aligning List Of Name:Value Pairs On Colon

-Original Message- Here's a case for a definition list. Following code is very basic, but you can build on it however you like. Graham Cook www.uaoz.com dt { display:block; float:left; width:10em; text-alig

[css-d] Flickering in Firefox: the saga continues

OK. Now I've resized all of the images in the right scrolling div as suggested by Nick and called the now uniform img size (#thumbnails img) in the style sheet. As I said earlier, after I placed the sizes of the images in my html a la 1996, the flickering stopped on my end. Big John said he was sti

Re: [css-d] recommend a css layout 2 columns fixed, center column fluid

Virtuallee wrote: > Hi > > Can anyone recommend a good free css layout for this site I've > designed? > http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/FinalFinal/Azule_homepage_chosen_revised.jpg > > It needs to have: > header > fixed left and right column > fluid center column > footer > > I al

[css-d] sitecheck / lists equal in ie+ff

Hi I just finished a mainly CSS site: http://www.museoarqueologico.com It's not 100% valid since it uses Flash. We have this issue with subnavigation lists (click in "Culturas Precolombinas") because they don't show up the same in IE6 and Firefox 1.0.7 and we had to cram them up so that IE wo

Re: [css-d] recommend a css layout 2 columns fixed, center column fluid

Virtuallee wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good free css layout for this site I've > designed? > http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/FinalFinal/Azule_homepage_chosen_revised.jpg > It needs to have: > header > fixed left and right column > fluid center column > footer If you by "fi

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

bill wrote: > YIKES! Another can o' worms. Since I'm not seeing the flicker at all > any more, I'll be attempting to fix it in the dark. Not much use in such "darkroom fixes" I'm afraid. :-) I'm not sure who is testing correct here, and the results will variate between Gecko-versions. Note that

Re: [css-d] Aligning List Of Name:Value Pairs On Colon

> I have a list of name:value pairs: > > > > > Name: Value > Another name: Another value > Other name: Other value > > > How about using a table, as this does look like tabular data to me? Then you could easily align the TH to the right and the TD to the lef

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

From: "Alex Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yes we all use workarounds. So what's the exact problem you have? The complexity. It sometimes reminds me of a Rube Goldberg machine :-) > I have asked you before offlist to elucidate. I now ask you again > (but I'm lazy and so just copying and pastin

[css-d] recommend a css layout 2 columns fixed, center column fluid

Hi Can anyone recommend a good free css layout for this site I've designed? http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/FinalFinal/Azule_homepage_chosen_revised.jpg It needs to have: header fixed left and right column fluid center column footer I also need to be able to add shading at

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

From: "Alex Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How? I would dearly like to see an actual working example where > simply inserting a very large spacer would produce anything like the > results of the equal height columns technique. Using big padding http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/pie/eq1.htm U

Re: [css-d] creating fluid layout with footer

Shelley Simpson wrote: > Hi all > > I am creating a layout with a header, two columns (a side menu and a content > area) and a footer. The side menu is longer than the content on some pages, > and on other pages the content is longer than the side menu. The footer needs > to clear both these col

[css-d] Aligning List Of Name:Value Pairs On Colon

Hello all, I have a list of name:value pairs: Name: Value Another name: Another value Other name: Other value How do I display them such that they are aligned by the colon (centered within the container)?: Name: Value Another name: Another va

[css-d] creating fluid layout with footer

Hi all I am creating a layout with a header, two columns (a side menu and a content area) and a footer. The side menu is longer than the content on some pages, and on other pages the content is longer than the side menu. The footer needs to clear both these columns. I am unable to get the foote

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

From: "Zoe M. Gillenwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>2. Really, Al. In what way, is a total separation of presentation >>>and display and content code, like spacer gifs? And in what way is >>>the faux columns technique less like spacers? >>> >>> >> >>Because the same end result could be accomlished b

Re: [css-d] relative bottom positioning

Alien8 Recordings wrote: >I am trying to position a navigation menu relative the bottom of its >parent element. To be more explicit, I would like the bottom left >corner of the navigation menu to line up with the bottom left corner >of its parent element which is a top banner div. If the use

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

>> 2. Really, Al. In what way, is a total separation of presentation >>and display and content code, like spacer gifs? And in what way is >>the faux columns technique less like spacers? > >Because the same end result could be accomlished by using a very >large spacer :-) How? I would dearly li

Re: [css-d] Matching column heights in a complexish layout

Adriano Castro wrote: > Hi all, > > What I'm trying to do is hard to put in words so I drew it: > > + http://dev.adrianocastro.net/help/0004/0004.png > > > I kind of got it to work but am having problems with matching the >height of the "container" div: > > + http://dev.ad

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

Al Sparber wrote: >From: "Alex Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>2. Really, Al. In what way, is a total separation of presentation >>and display and content code, like spacer gifs? And in what way is >>the faux columns technique less like spacers? >> >> > >Because the same end result cou

Re: [css-d] is this a valid hack for safari only??

What is the hack for the safari oversized background-repeat bug? I seem to be having this problem right now. I found this URL referred to on another page (http://www.holovaty.com/blog/archive/2003/01/09/2152), but apparently he doesn't want us to use this hack anymore because it's been removed: ht

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

YIKES! Another can o' worms. Since I'm not seeing the flicker at all any more, I'll be attempting to fix it in the dark. Just sat down at my computer. I'll start working on this now. Big John, maybe you can just get a different browser . Wouldn't it be great if ... ... Waiting for the magic elixar

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

From: "Alex Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1. It's already fixed in Firefox 1.5. > 2. Really, Al. In what way, is a total separation of presentation > and display and content code, like spacer gifs? And in what way is > the faux columns technique less like spacers? Because the same end result

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

> > Tested this in Mozilla 1.7.12: > > #wrapper {display: table;} > > ...no more flickering in any direction. Ingo Chao wrote: > Georg, your suggestion seems to fix the vertical flicker on resize > locally for this test page in older Geckos: I just tried the table display on Bill's page, and no

Re: [css-d] IE 5.0 Windows problem

The Sliding Doors method says to float the container and the LI's so that you do not have to specify height on the anchors. That will make display:block work and then you shouldn't need a height attribute. -- -- C Montoya rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com ___

[css-d] relative bottom positioning

Hi, I am trying to position a navigation menu relative the bottom of its parent element. To be more explicit, I would like the bottom left corner of the navigation menu to line up with the bottom left corner of its parent element which is a top banner div. If the user's font settings are l

Re: [css-d] IE 5.0 Windows problem

Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 12:34:07 PM, Michael Angeles wrote: > header and the links are not clickable in Windows IE 5.0. Does anyone My guess is that it is the height specified on the anchor: > #header #nav1 #menu1 li, #header #nav1 #menu1 li a { >height: 27px; >display: block; >b

[css-d] Matching column heights in a complexish layout

Hi all, What I'm trying to do is hard to put in words so I drew it: + http://dev.adrianocastro.net/help/0004/0004.png I kind of got it to work but am having problems with matching the height of the "container" div: + http://dev.adrianocastro.net/help/0004/0004.

Re: [css-d] text appears only if window is resized!

Thank you, Michael, that was it! At 12:23 PM -0600 11/8/05, Michael Hulse seems to have written: >Peekaboo bug maybe? > >http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/peekaboo.html > > > When http://www.vsi.cape.com/~dagnew/lib/foo.php is viewed in IE6 > > Win, all text within #content div appea

[css-d] divs not expanding with content

hi all, i'm having problems with this page: http://www.loopfruit.co.uk/component/option,com_contact/Itemid,12/ i'm trying to get it to look like the page you'll see if you click 'home', with the exception that the content on

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

Thomas wrote: >http://neodude.net/host/cssd/fxselectbug.html It looks like Donna's bug, but it seems different in practice since it definitely affects the mac version of FF1 as well. Plus, there's no scope for working round the problem - even shifting the excessive padding and margin on to gen

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

On Nov 8, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Thomas Bukowski wrote: > I haven't been able to find a fix yet. Any ideas? This is a variant on the overflow:hidden; problem that's been true in this browser since the beginning. (Summary: in any overflow:hidden; block, you can click-and-drag to highlight text, a

Re: [css-d] is this a valid hack for safari only??

On Nov 3, 2005, at 4:55 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /*\*/ > html>body*.info_box_top_left {background-color: red; } > /**/ > > I have been using this. Is it a valid hack for safari only?? Sorry for the delayed response. IMO, this is a bad idea. You should only Hack

[css-d] IE 5.0 Windows problem

I'm using sliding doors method for the global navigation in a site header and the links are not clickable in Windows IE 5.0. Does anyone have ideas or suggestions as to why this would happen? http://winningconnections.com/ http://winningconnections.com/css/wc-layout.css The offending bi

Re: [css-d] Three column layout with a static middle column

This exact system below (expression etc) was actually used previously but there were problems when people resized the window. Basically content started disappearing within the affected DIV, this was fixed by either reloading the page or resizing the page again. Annoying because it fixed the proble

[css-d] Disappearing nav image

OK Charles Dort has shown me that my nav image disappears both in Firefox and IE6, and also on a normal screen, not just widescreens. (See my other thread: IE6, Widescreens and vanishing images). So I guess I need to look for another reason why the right most nav item disappears for some users -

Re: [css-d] Three column layout with a static middle column

From: "Pringle, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Another solution, depending on your page layout and needs, would be > to give > the middle div a minimum width. Of course IE ignores that > declaration, but > Stu Nicholls [0] has a solution for that if you're up for the > challenge. And if you're not

Re: [css-d] PIE's One True Layout - scrolling bug

Thomas Bukowski wrote: > This is a duplicate/continuation of the bug noticed by Donna Casey in: > http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/64904 > > The fix mentioned in that thread, by removing the "position: relative" > of an element inside the column, doesn't work. The fact that there

Re: [css-d] Style Sheet Link in Body Tag?

On 09/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "It is not unheard of for people to drop a style tag in the body when > they can't edit the head section (e.g. with really bad content > management systems or when sending HTML formatted emails (as many > systems, especially webmail, strip

Re: [css-d] float clearing: div clear or br clear all

> I prefer to use and in my css use > > div.clear { > clear: both; > } > > but I find that sometimes it doesnt work at all and I have > only been able to > get clearing by reverting to the break tag again > > > > this is fine for the most part on transitional doc types but > its not when >

Re: [css-d] Three column layout with a static middle column

> It should be a quick fix, would simply stating a fixed width > for the middle > DIV make it static in size? Short answer. Yes. If you specify a specific width, it will be that wide no matter the size of the window. You may want to consider that effect on your content's readability if the end

Re: [css-d] Website Check

Emma wrote: >Hi All >I have just made my company’s site valid XHTML. >http://www.thefmcompany.com >Please could you check the drop down menus in any non-IE browser – >specifically I’d like to know if it is usable on the Mac. > Emma, Hard to hold and sub-level flyout not appearing in FF. You migh

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > bill wrote: > >>> http://www.first-encounter-design.com > > Tested this in Mozilla 1.7.12: > #wrapper {display: table;} > ...no more flickering in any direction. > > Worth a try across more Gecko-versions. > > regards > Georg Georg, your suggestion seems to fix th

Re: [css-d] float clearing: div clear or br clear all

> I prefer to use and in my css use > div.clear { > clear: both; > } > > but I find that sometimes it doesnt work at all and I have only been able to > get clearing by reverting to the break tag again > > > > this is fine for the most part on transitional doc types but its not when > I'm going st

Re: [css-d] float clearing: div clear or br clear all

From: "cFA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > this is fine for the most part on transitional doc types but its not > when > I'm going strict as its not valid. > > 1) has anyone else experienced this > 2) what causes it The clear attribute, along with many other tag attributes, has been deprecated. If y

Re: [css-d] Style Sheet Link in Body Tag?

"It is not unheard of for people to drop a style tag in the body when they can't edit the head section (e.g. with really bad content management systems or when sending HTML formatted emails (as many systems, especially webmail, strip the head section entirely)). Not unheard of, but still wrong." -

Re: [css-d] Three column layout with a static middle column

From: "Eoin Maguire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Does anyone know if it's possible to have a simple three vertical > column > layout but with the middle column remaining the same width even if > someone > strarts dragging/resizing their browser window? I don't mean simply > change > resolution, I me

[css-d] float clearing: div clear or br clear all

I prefer to use and in my css use div.clear { clear: both; } but I find that sometimes it doesnt work at all and I have only been able to get clearing by reverting to the break tag again this is fine for the most part on transitional doc types but its not when I'm going strict as its not vali

[css-d] Three column layout with a static middle column

Hi, Does anyone know if it's possible to have a simple three vertical column layout but with the middle column remaining the same width even if someone strarts dragging/resizing their browser window? I don't mean simply change resolution, I mean clicking the 'Restore Down' button on your bro

Re: [css-d] Website Check

On 09/11/05, Emma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is Appendix C? http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#guidelines -- David Dorward __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discus

Re: [css-d] Website Check

> On 09/11/05, Emma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have just made my company's site valid XHTML. > > Looks like you don't conform to Appendix C (which you should do before > serving as text/html). What is Appendix C? Thank you for your accessibility comments. -- No virus found in this out

Re: [css-d] Website Check

From: "Emma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi All > I have just made my company’s site valid XHTML. > > http://www.thefmcompany.com > > Please could you check the drop down menus in any non-IE browser – > specifically I’d like to know if it is usable on the Mac. They appear to work although the third lev

Re: [css-d] Website Check

Emma wrote: http://www.thefmcompany.com Please could you check the drop down menus in any non-IE browser – specifically I’d like to know if it is usable on the Mac. Third level fails in FF and in Mozilla Increasing font size the content climbs over the footer Regards Rob ___

Re: [css-d] Website Check

Emma wrote: > http://www.thefmcompany.com > Please could you check the drop down menus in any non-IE browser – > specifically I’d like to know if it is usable on the Mac. Howdy, Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7 Microsoft ® Windows Version

Re: [css-d] Website Check

Emma wrote: >Please could you check the drop down menus in any non-IE browser - >specifically I'd like to know if it is usable on the Mac. OS X 10.4.3: Safari 2.0 - dropdowns work, but for sublevel fly outs, I had some difficulty because the fly out box isn't even with the top of the nav item an

Re: [css-d] Website Check

On 09/11/05, Emma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have just made my company's site valid XHTML. Looks like you don't conform to Appendix C (which you should do before serving as text/html). > http://www.thefmcompany.com > Please could you check the drop down menus in any non-IE browser – > specif

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

bill wrote: > I didn't see any horizontal flicker on my page! Are you seeing this here, or > you've seen it on other sites? Other sites. I just got a tip, and sure enough, the FF1.5 beta appears not to have the flicker. I was pretty sure that this was strongly on their minds, and it's been zapped

[css-d] IE6, Widescreens and vanishing images

Apparently when my site is viewed on a widescreen PC using IE6, the right most nav item ("Where next?") vanishes from the display. It's not that the image doesn't load - it just isn't there at all. www ichameleon-dev6 co uk/page/en/312/0/5/what+we+have+learned.html (Sorry you'll have to rebuild

[css-d] OT: CSSVista = free CSS editor for winXP

http://www.sitevista.com/cssvista/ Haven't tried it yet, but appears to be a nice gift to CSS architects running XP. "CSSVista is a free Windows application for web developers which lets you edit your CSS code live in both Internet Explorer and Firefox simultaneously." It's alpha software (accord

Re: [css-d] ASP.NET/CSS

I have set up the yahoogroup 'ASPCSS' to continue this discussion http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ASPCSS Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey all, --- snip --- Or perhaps it's more accurate to say that while it could be considered so, that would only be true for th

[css-d] Website Check

Hi All I have just made my company’s site valid XHTML. http://www.thefmcompany.com Please could you check the drop down menus in any non-IE browser – specifically I’d like to know if it is usable on the Mac. Many thanks Emma -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked

Re: [css-d] Footer not sticking to bottom

Shawn Ferguson wrote: > > Using this model: > > http://www.jardsenterprises.com/ska/layout3 > > I am having trouble making the footer stick to the bottom, instead it rises > to the end of the content and there is a white background below the footer. > Any clues on why it functions this way an

Re: [css-d] DOCTYPE STRICT declaration problems with the page appearance in MOZ

On 09/11/05, shlomi asaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IE dosent makes me problems. why is that? It's the correct way of displaying the image. As it's a inline element, it shall keep a bottom "margin" to characters that require more room down, like "j" or "g". You can try to use images as "blo

Re: [css-d] DOCTYPE STRICT declaration problems with the page appearance in MOZ

shlomi asaf wrote: > mozila gives me hurd time with pictures in a page the declare imself as > HTML-STRICT (as seen below) > http://dogma.co.il/margin.gif > you can see in that example that moz makes a margin:2px between the

[css-d] DOCTYPE STRICT declaration problems with the page appearance in MOZ

Hi :) mozila gives me hurd time with pictures in a page the declare imself as HTML-STRICT (as seen below) http://dogma.co.il/margin.gif you can see in that example that moz makes a margin:2px between the pictures. IE dosent

Re: [css-d] Style Sheet Link in Body Tag?

On 08/11/05, !!blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe the only time you use style within the body tag is when sending > html emails. It is not unheard of for people to drop a style tag in the body when they can't edit the head section (e.g. with really bad content management systems or when

Re: [css-d] Aligning text

> You have markup like: > Angus D.F. MacKinnon > 23756 110B Avenue > > But your css is: > .generalresume_name { > > .generalresume_address { > > Either the css needs to be > #generalresume_name { > #generalresume_address { > > Or you need to change the markup to class="generalresume_name" > >

Re: [css-d] safari users site check please - mrinfo.de

Thanx for your words, felix. I think i will switch the font size to pt. so ie users could resize if they want. but i think its better to use an explicit size like 12pt instead using medium which will scale different for different users. its also a design problem: the layout is not liquid and wil

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

Thanks Georg. And I will re-test as you suggest. Cheers, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:06 AM To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefo

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

bill wrote: >> http://www.first-encounter-design.com Tested this in Mozilla 1.7.12: #wrapper {display: table;} ...no more flickering in any direction. Worth a try across more Gecko-versions. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no