-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org]
b is presentational. It says, Make this bold.
em and strong aren't presentational. They say emphasize/strongly
emphasize this. They don't say HOW to emphasize/strongly emphasize it.
Michael Stevens said:
I use use EM when I want italic and STRONG when I want bold, sometimes I'll
change the font color as well, therefore I consider them presentational
tags.
Are your definitions the ideal we all should adhere to? I think not. Why
a specific developer choose to misuse a certain
Michael Stevens wrote:
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org]
b is presentational. It says, Make this bold.
em and strong aren't presentational. They say emphasize/strongly
emphasize this. They don't say HOW to
I use use EM when I want italic and STRONG when I want bold, therefore I
consider them presentational tags.
That's like saying I use CODE when I want a monospace font and LI when I want
bullets next to text, therefore I consider them presentational tags.
I hope you see how both of those are
b is presentational. It says, Make this bold.
em and strong aren't presentational. They say
emphasize/strongly
emphasize this. They don't say HOW to emphasize/strongly emphasize
it.
They're just saying that this text is more important than surrounding
text,
so emphasize it.
---
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
fwiw, I don't agree.
If an author wants italics or bold then heemshould/em,
strongmust/strong, usei andb.
To stay on-topic I won't mention semantics (should be a no brainer though),
but CSS: a User Agent does *not* have to makeem italics andstrong
bold, but it
At 20:08 + on 03/06/2010, Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote about Re:
[css-d] FW: bemstrongi tags:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
fwiw, I don't agree.
If an author wants italics or bold then heemshould/em,
strongmust/strong, usei andb.
To stay on-topic I won't mention semantics (should be a
I am a volunteer webmaster for a couple of churches, and on one site all pages
have a header div across the top, and below that a navigation div floated left
with main content div flowing to its right.
One page lists parish events of which we have photos and/or video elsewhere on
the site.
Bob Rosenberg said:
CSS is a way of changing the built-in defaults for how to display
text enclosed in the different tags.
The built-in defaults ARE CSS. It's the CSS the browsermakers decided
to have builtin. Technically, this is the case with Firefox anyway.
Bob Rosenberg said:
CSS is a way of changing the built-in defaults for how to display
text enclosed in the different tags.
The built-in defaults ARE CSS. It's the CSS the browsermakers decided
to have builtin. Technically, this is the case with Firefox anyway.
They decide following the
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
fwiw, I don't agree.
If an author wants italics or bold then heemshould/em,
strongmust/strong, usei andb.
To stay on-topic I won't mention semantics (should be a no brainer
though),
but CSS: a User Agent does *not* have to makeem italics
andstrong
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org]
Subject: Re: [css-d] FW: bemstrongi tags
Because, if the developer uses some elements primarily for their browser
default CSS, then any element can be considered presentational for
Theophan Dort wrote:
I am a volunteer webmaster for a couple of churches, and on one site all
pages have a header div across the top, and below that a navigation div
floated left with main content div flowing to its right.
Do you have any suggestions?
Theophan
Hi Theophan,
A
A fast and dirty suggestion. Nothing wrong with using a dl I guess. I just
did it different.
It works -- it's perfect! I have to study up on that overflow hidden that
seems to be a key in how it works even when the text in one div is short. I'll
go back to my books, and if I can't figure
Theophan Dort wrote:
A fast and dirty suggestion. Nothing wrong with using a dl I guess. I just
did it different.
It works -- it's perfect! I have to study up on that overflow hidden that
seems to be a key in how it works even when the text in one div is short.
I'll go back to my
MB wrote:
Bob Rosenberg said:
CSS is a way of changing the built-in defaults for how to display
text enclosed in the different tags.
The built-in defaults ARE CSS. It's the CSS the browsermakers decided
to have builtin. Technically, this is the case with Firefox anyway.
No, you are both
Brian M. Curran wrote:
Hi All,
I need to make a small table for my website (For my rates of service.),
and so my question is, Does anyone know of a resource for different
styles of CSS tables, so I can get some ideas on neat table
styles/layouts? Something akin to listamatic for lists.
Hi all!
Please read the latest two posts on IE7 on my blog and tell me if I
stumbled on something that's well-documented or not. Can you make up a
static test? I used JavaScript to create spans in the following
structure:
ul id=navigation
lia href=spanLink/span/a/li
/ul
Try to apply some
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Hi all!
Please read the latest two posts on IE7 on my blog and tell me if I
stumbled on something that's well-documented or not. Can you make up a
static test? I used JavaScript to create spans in the following
structure:
ul id=navigation
lia
19 matches
Mail list logo
