I think I'm getting closer to understand how to use this new (to me)
method of positioning, but I don't get what it's relative to, such that
Firefox renders it differently from Opera, Chrome and Safari..
It's the same code, but obviously FF interprets it differently. Can
someone explain why
On 3/16/14 7:04 PM, John wrote:
Now all the browsers are showing things correctly, except Opera, which
has my aside down lower and in the middle..it appears to be influenced
by section, but I'm not seeing what the connection is...
My bad, again..I had no idea that my version of Opera was, let's
On 3/16/14 5:52 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
solution: position them from the right…
#social {
display:inline-block; /* <—- remove this, makes no sense with an absolute
position element */
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:47em; /* <———- change this to right: 0; */
}
Philippe;
this helped en
Here is an example without using ::after and content
http://jsfiddle.net/2n6an/1/
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
> Aargh, this is annoying. I've got it narrowed down to the text shadow.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Chris Rockwell
> wrote:
>
>> Or maybe it's s
Le 17 mars 2014 à 09:07, John a écrit :
> this fixed things for Safari, but all the other browsers are showing things
> pretty much wherever the spirit moves them. Is there something else I've left
> "up for grabs" in this? The whole design appears to be exploding
>
>
> thanks for any cl
Aargh, this is annoying. I've got it narrowed down to the text shadow.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
> Or maybe it's something else, this seems to work fine:
> http://jsfiddle.net/2n6an/
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Chris Rockwell
> wrote:
>
>> It's the lette
Or maybe it's something else, this seems to work fine:
http://jsfiddle.net/2n6an/
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
> It's the letter-spacing, just don't know why yet. It appears to only have
> an affect when it's being applied to the content: "" attribute.
>
>
> On Sun, Ma
It's the letter-spacing, just don't know why yet. It appears to only have
an affect when it's being applied to the content: "" attribute.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:15 PM, David Laakso wrote:
> In the footer ie/11 is chopping-off the crossbar of the numerical
> digit 4. What to do?
>
> html
> ht
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:07 PM, John wrote:
> On 3/16/14 12:13 PM, Georg wrote:
>>
>> You are absolute positioning "in thin air" ... not given browsers a
>> starting point for positioning.
>> That makes browsers "guess" what you mean, and one browser's guess is as
>> good as another's.
>>
>> Addi
In the footer ie/11 is chopping-off the crossbar of the numerical
digit 4. What to do?
html
http://ccstudi.com/
css
http://ccstudi.com/site/css/sisu.css
footer::after{
border:1px dotted red;
content:"'14";
color:rgb(218,165,32);
font:1250% 'falstaffMTStd';
letter-spacing:-.25em;
margin:0;
paddin
On 3/16/14 12:13 PM, Georg wrote:
You are absolute positioning "in thin air" ... not given browsers a
starting point for positioning.
That makes browsers "guess" what you mean, and one browser's guess is
as good as another's.
Adding...
#social { top: 0; left: 0;}
...as starting points, will ma
Den 16.03.2014 05:06, skrev John:
my social media icons, top right respect my wrapper in FF, but in
Chrome, Safari and Opera, the whole group moves outside the wrapper
to the right by 1 icon...
Can someone explain why this is?
You are absolute positioning "in thin air" ... not given browser
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:30 PM, John wrote:
> I could swear that I adequately differentiated my header nav from my footer
> nav, but the browsers are telling me differntly..
>
> Here is the link, if you could kindly take a peek:
> http://coffeeonmars.com/W200/test/DTake_Index.html
>
> The issue i
Felix:
I just wish to say that your knowledge of this topic (et al) is simply amazing.
You are a wealth of information -- thank you very much for your participation.
Cheers,
tedd
___
tedd sperling
t...@sperling.com
___
On 2014-03-16 07:25 (GMT) Philip Taylor composed:
Felix, you answer is very helpful and very informative, but
there are places where (to me) it seems to make no sense at
all. May I ask you to expand on the following, please ?
DPI is often used interchangeably with display resolution
DPI i
Felix, you answer is very helpful and very informative, but
there are places where (to me) it seems to make no sense at
all. May I ask you to expand on the following, please ?
DPI is often used interchangeably with display resolution
DPI is a single number (1-dimensional) whilst display resol
16 matches
Mail list logo
