Chetan Crasta wrote:
I'm not sure of the meaning of those characters, though. Do they have
the same meaning as regular numbers?
Technically, the circled numbers are defined as numbers (digits), i.e. their
general category is Number, and they also have numeric values defined for
them in
Bob Rosenberg wrote:
You can also just use the numbers in the U+2776-U+2793 range which
will give you 1-10 as Serif numbers in black or white circles as well
as Sans-Serif 1-10 in black circles. Why fool around when the
characters exist in your fonts?
On the theoretical side: because these
Nancy Seeger wrote:
The beta text area is located here - navbar area Contact with a web
font phone:
http://nina.artsassistance.com/
I'd first like to draw your attention to a styling issue that you may not
have noticed because it depends on browsing environment: the text looks
somewhat odd
John D wrote:
The priority order of styles is as follows:
1.Browser default
2.External style sheet
3.Internal styles via style /style
4.Inline styles table style=border:3px; text-align:center/table
There is no such priority order. The cascading order is much more complex
and almost always
Angela French wrote:
.center
{ display: block;
text-align: center;
margin: 0 auto;
}
My question is this. It appears in FF that .center was being applied
to my td in addition to my td.center. But not so in IE.
How did you draw the conclusion whether .center was or was not applied? In a
Chetan Crasta wrote:
I have made an example of the design here:
http://roughtech.com/t/testali.html
It uses CSS only.
It seems to use the positioning technique I outlined and demonstrated, but
it contains lots of features quite independent of the issue at hand, such as
odd line heights. In
Angela French wrote:
I usually style all my tables with nice colors and never have any
rendering issues.
I usually have several issues, and I don't even consider colors, as a rule.
But the issues depend on the table, its context, and its intended use.
Today I'm in a hurry, and just want a
John wrote:
This link shows graphically what my goal is: http://thinkplan.org/
workshop/botAlign.jpg
You mean
http://thinkplan.org/workshop/botAlign.jpg
(A URL should not contain a linebreak.)
Exactly what there is the matter?
this link is of the actual, live-code page:
John wrote:
On Dec 10, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
The HTML code and the CSS code have syntax errors that are
detectable using available checkers. They should be fixed, but more
importantly, we need a description of the problem (what is
expected, and a URL demonstrating
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
But the obvious approach is to use a single-cell table with
valign=bottom. You won't need any CSS for that, though CSS helps you
to remove the default margins for heading elements, for example (it
is natural to use heading elements for the head/subhead stuff).
If you
Tim Arnold wrote:
The beauty of CSS is that you can style your H2s to be larger than
your H1s.
There's even more beauty: you can style some text as prominently as you like
without even making it a heading at all. It often happens that people want
to highlight e.g. a company name or a
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://datagnostics.com/test/vertical.html
I've got superscript text that needs to be all over the page -- it's
part of the company name.
At this point I'd raise the question whether the superscript text could be
written using superscript characters such as ². If it
G.Sørtun wrote:
On 09.10.2010 06:41, David Laakso wrote:
This is a first-pass at tight but not touch [ing] on h2
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Visually there is a vertical imbalance, because the bottom of first
letter is in perfect balance with next letter. First letter down a
pixel or so,
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Sep 26, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
vertical-align: baseline;
position: relative;
bottom: some factorex;
I've used that for quite a while and it works fine across the board.
It seems that it wasn't completely new to me either...
david wrote:
I seem to recall that URLs are not case sensitive?
URLs are case-sensitive, but some parts of them, including the server part,
are defined to be case-insensitive. Whether people know about this is a
different matter. For usability, it is good policy to announce your server
Under Subject: Re: [css-d] Capitalize
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Chris Blake wrote:
P.S. I need to be using sub-script and super-script a fair bit on
this site, any warnings or words of wisdom about doing this?
In my experience, sub- and superscripts only too easily destroy
the
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:08 PM, John D wrote:
Does any one know the CSS equivalent of html font size=x?
[...]
here you go:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#propdef-font-size
The text there says that the table provides user agents guidelines, and
the notes
Val Dobson wrote:
Is there a CSS method to hide the current page link in a navigation
list? ie: if you're on the widgets page, you don't get the See our
crazy widgets! link in the menu.
You can do this only if you have some way of distinguishing the current page
link from other elements in
Sandy wrote:
#links a[href~=yourcurrentpage.html] {
This means that you would need a different style sheet, with a different URL
there, for each and every page. I don't see how this could be any easier or
otherwise better than simply having, say,
a href=... class=current.../a
for each
Chris Blake wrote:
What about a:active and/or a:current?
The latter is a mere proposal, though an interesting one. You might find
experimental implementations, but hardly anything useful in practice now or
in the near future.
The :active pseudo-class is an old invention (in the www
David Hucklesby wrote:
Without adding a class to each BODY or HTML element to identify the
page, I don't know of any CSS solution.
How would such class attributes help the least (in this issue)? They cannot
be used to distinguish between different links on the page.
But you mention includes
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Yeah, and the user who uses Lynx on Windows 95, I know I know…
No you don't. Those who use Lynx will not be affected by font fall-back
issues. In trying to ridicule my concern for the majority, you seem to fall
back to strawman arguments from the 1990s.
I
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
A modern OS / browser will do the job for you.
But most users, or (to be cautious) at least a non-negligible share like 40%
of users, seem to be using an OS / browser that in non-modern by your
implicit definition.
p { font-family: font-a, font-b, font-c, serif;}
luby wrote:
I have a problem for the style font-famliy of textarea .
As usual, a URL would have been most useful. It would have let us access the
page as it is, as opposite to e.g. GB2312 encoded copy of a snippet thereof.
(My e-mail program shows straight Ascii quotation marks as curly when
Tim Offenstein wrote:
I'm seeing a number
of students mark up their XHTML with descriptively named DIVs that
have no counterpart in the CSS.
This is a general design issue and about markup, not CSS.
From the CSS perspective, there are some risks, whether you mean classes or
ids (or both) by
Susan Grossman wrote:
Why aren't my active and visited link CSS commands working on my
portfolio page? I want people to know that they've already clicked
on an image.
(I think the OP meant clicked on a link to see an image, as the links are
text links, as far as I can see, though it is not
Claude Needham wrote:
On the following page I have a div floating to the left with a
blockquote wrapping it on the right.
http://www.imag3.com/test/
I don't see anything in your CSS code that would affect the blockquote; you
have
blockquote {
}
Is there a way to style the blockquote
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
div class=itemspan class=bullbull;/span list item
text/div
[...]
[...] using meaningless glyphs for presentational
purposes is bad for accessibility,
The character denoted by bull; is not a meaningless glyph but the BULLET
character, which has the meaning of being a
Brian M. Curran wrote:
Can anyone suggest a CSS font treatment to my home page quotes, that
would jazz them up and make them more appealing?
www.draftingservices.com
I think there are at least three problems with the rendering of blockquote
elements on that page:
1) Their font size is
Peter Coates wrote:
Why not use
ul {
list-style-image URL(bullet.gif);
}
I believe that is supported by IE.
Yes it is, but the placement (especially vertical) placement of the bullet
images varies by browser and there's nothing you can do about it. Moreover,
the images don't scale if
David Laakso wrote:
On this page
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/resources/
there are a set of 12 underlined links in the right column.
The left side of the focus-ring box is missing.
I think it's more commonly called focus rectangle, and in CSS terms, it's
outline, rendered by default
bho...@aol.com wrote:
I'm waving the white flag here. I'm trying to create an html table
using css attributes, and regardless of what I'm trying, I can't get
rid of the cellpadding.
Did you try setting the padding of cells to zero?
Shouldn't this work?
table{
padding:0px;
}
No, it
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
It seems that font-size and font-family are not inherited by these
input fields, hence why she suggests to always specify a font size
and family for those.
Browsers indeed generally have specific font-size and font-family defaults
for text input fields. Conceptually,
Andy B. wrote:
1. I put in the style for the container title font-size: 18M; What
exactly does M do? The font size was REALLY HUGE. I would say around
160pt.
I'm curious: what browser behaves like that? Any browser that works
according to CSS recommendations ignores the declaration
Karl Bedingfield wrote:
Sorry about the subject title but essentially, I am trying to create a
cross (4 quarters that are divided by a cross +).
Your description just does not tell what you really want. If you want
something resembling a plus sign + (which you call a cross), why don't you
Ed Seedhouse wrote:
The alt tag should contain a description of the image.
No, in general it should contain a replacement for the image. But this is
off-topic in the list, so I will comment on the _styling_ related issues of
alt attributes.
If you were
viewing your page without images,
Freelance Traveller wrote:
I have found that many of the documents that I am converting from Word
to web contain definitions, but in a format that doesn't work well
with the default format for a DL. I'd like to be able to format
these as DLs anyway, because that's what they are,
Angela French wrote:
I am trying to implement list-style-image.
URL?
IE8 is exhibiting odd
behavior. Some of the images show in the list, others do not.
Refresh the browser and which ones show or don't show can change.
You may have markup errors or CSS syntax errors. Or it might be
Shanna Cramer wrote:
I frequently work on child themes and build custom style sheets in
addition to the parent style sheet.
Is there a way to zero out a style? Just remove any parent styling
that was applied to some element.
No, you cannot zero out style settings, only override them.
For
Angela French wrote:
I am trying to figure out why IE (tested in IE 8) won't show my
background images.
Maybe the images don't exist at the URLs you specify.
My style is:
ul#menu li li a:visited /* sub list links */
{
color:#0096b7;
background:url('/images/checkmark.gif')
Krupa Anna Katalin wrote:
solution is:
It's impossible to tell what the correct solution is without knowing the
problem (read: the URL).
first if you use background:, then you can't use background-color,
background-image,
or any other definition, what you used in background: definition.
Angela French wrote:
I am using a graphic as a background image on all lists in my site.
The problem is that on nested lists, the graphic appears twice on the
li that is the first item for the nested list.
This would be easier if you specified the URL, so that we can see the markup
and all
Nancy Johnson wrote:
I have a form with hidden input fields and a submit button. It's
inline with elements that are not in the form.
In IE browsers there is an empty space where the hidden fields are.
Is there a way using CSS to get rid of the space?
I've seen such things happen on some
Linda Miller, DVM wrote:
Sorry. I should have checked this first.
Checked what?
It must have been the browser that I was using Safari 4.0.4 on the
Mac.
No, I think it's on line 42 of your code. A wild guess, but it _might_ be
true, whereas your guess is most probably wrong, as you
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Please read the latest two posts on IE7 on my blog and tell me if I
stumbled on something that's well-documented or not.
Can you please provide a URL that demonstrates the issue in the simplest
possible context?
Can you make up a static test?
It depends on what
Eric A. Meyer wrote:
There is one non-class approach that's fairly cross-browser
friendly, and that's to use a combination of :first-child and
adjacent-sibling combinators:
td:first-child + td + td {...styles for third column...}
That works in every current browser. It will fail in
Bobby Jack wrote:
I'm surprised no-one's pointed out the obvious: that using
background will override all other background-* properties (to
their default values), in addition to setting background-color.
It's very obvious if you look at CSS specifications, but they aren't
everyone's
Brian M. Curran wrote:
I'm styling my website, and noticed that at my given text size that
the line lengths are too long, because they hurt my eyes. Is there a
rule of thumb for number of characters per line that will yield the
best readability?
There are lots of rules of thumbs... just pick
Eduardo Varela wrote:
For an educational site aimed at mathematics I want to say (4^3) ^
2 the way maths books do it.
but I want the second exponent (the number 2), to be in a higher
position that the first (the number 3). How could it be done?
- -
You do not need css to accomplish your
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
I'm afraid you misunderstood the question, or the OP misunderstood what
fraction bar means. It means a character resembling / but with
different angle and properties, used to construct fractional numbers in a
particular rendering, similar to that of ½.
It was pointed
Del Wegener wrote:
I have been fighting these same issues for a several years and I am
convinced that the best method is to use images.
Hardly. Using images for such purposes are the last resort and always come
with problems, even if you define them with CSS settings that make them
scale
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I think you'd have better result across browsers if you were using
margin instead of padding.
Yes, it's an old problem that browsers haven't implemented padding properly
for img elements.
However, IE 8 implements it, but only in standards mode. If your document
is
Bill Braun wrote:
For starters...http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp.
That particular page does not discuss the rendering differences at all, just
the document type declarations (in a misleading way, typical of w3schools
pages). The question was:
can someone point me to a
G. Sørtun wrote:
Magnus Fahlström wrote:
I don't know how to achieve this without using a table:
http://www.magstorm.se/table.htm A table-like design with four
columns, with every row numbered, wrapped in a float:left div.
For content that fits the tabular data definition, use HTML
Maslowski, Eric wrote:
The site
I've been working on (at link below) works as expected on FF, IE, and
Safari on a Windows system. (Vista XP) However, when the same pages
are viewed on a Mac (FF Safari) the alignments are off, there
seems to be additional kerning on the text, etc. In
pr...@itransition.com wrote:
In case of publishing any text online as a HTML page - I face the
problem of the correct reflection of symbols of several languages
which require extended Latin character encoding. In this case I'm
searching the Entity (hex) from the list on this site
Lalena wrote:
Now I am wondering how to remove the extra space before/after a
paragraph. I tried setting margins, and margin-top and margin-bottom
and padding to 0, but it didn't work. Anyone know?
URL?
Your style sheet might contain a syntax error, causing some rule(s) to be
ignored.
Ellen Heitman wrote:
Anyone have an idea as to what's going on here?
http://www.williamtobrien.com/airraids.html
http://www.williamtobrien.com/letters_leaving.html
If you view these pages in Safari and Firefox, you'll see what they
should look like. However, the iframes are all wrong in IE.
David Dorward wrote:
2009/9/27 Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi:
Theoretically, you could use selectors like [dir=rtl], but I don’t
think that’s practical. (For one thing, such a selector matches an
element that has the dir property explicitly set to rtl, as
opposite to inherited
דניאל דנון wrote:
I've been working on some project of transforming LTR design into a
RTL(Right-To-Left) design.
It seems like even when I set the direction to rtl,
background-position: Xpx Ypx seems to count X pixels from the left-top
corner and not from the right-top corner.
As far as I
MOHAMMED NASEER wrote:
can someone tell me, a newbie, why in code (A) the 'width' works, but
in code (B) it doesn't :
It would be much easier to study the issue if you had posted URLs instead of
code fragments. For one thing, nasty things may happen to HTML markup when
posted to Usenet
Nancy Johnson wrote:
I got a css style sheet from a client that we are going to develop and
the following tags were included. I had never seen them before
ins
kbd
samp
Can anyone tell me what they are used for and the best time to use
The defined meaning and best usage of HTML tags are
Duane Nelson wrote:
I'm cleaning up my css and xhtml for a new design and having problems
with a text box.
It's generally more productive to design new pages well than to clean up
existing pages.
URL: http://rapicom.net/site-2009/quotes.html
CSS: http://rapicom.net/site-2009/css/rc.css
Victor Subervi wrote:
I have this that works well:
img { border:10px solid #7B2E91 }
I would like to do one on top of another, something like this:
img { border:10px solid #7B2E91 }
img { border:20px solid #00 }
It won't work, since the latter rule just overrides the former.
You
Chang Huang wrote:
I've forgotten to mention that the list is
dynamically generated, sorry, so it's not possible to predict the last
'special' item.
Then the generating process should be modified so that it becomes possible
to mark the last 'special' item. Typically it would just have to
Matt Hampel wrote:
On my site, the number of an ordered list item will disappear when
the list begins with a blockquote. This problem occurs in IE 7, but
not Firefox or Safari.
Here's an example:
http://arborupdate.com/article/1843/primary-results-coming-in#c025109
I suppose you are
Ce Ce wrote:
Can default value text be two different styles within the same
textbox?
No, because the text needs to be plain text - no way to insert markup there,
thus no inner elements.
For example -- in one input text box I'd like to put:
Location (city or zip)
Can Location be large and
Andy Stevens wrote:
I have a page with an existing unordered list
I would keep it that way.
(more or less) that I reckon, from a semantic viewpoint, ought really
to be a definition list.
I tend to agree, but what you really benefit from changing the markup,
presentationally or otherwise?
MEM wrote:
All h1 that are followed by a p will have a padding-bottom of X.
Is this possible?
As the discussion has shown, the practical way is to use a class. On the
other hand, normally a page should have one h1 element (one highest-level
heading) only, so I don't quite see why you can't
Stephen Tang wrote:
I encountered a peculiar use case. The business desires to display a
small amount of text as a handwritten font. They want the handwritten
font sitting on blue lines. This would simulate the effect of writing
in a notebook.
You could do something like this:
Markup:
p
Ellen Heitman wrote:
My site has large amounts of text (basically you will be able to read
the contents of a book on my site, divided into chapters). I found
the best way to manage the amount of text (we're talking 50+ pages of
a PDF document) was to put all the text into an iframe, and
trevor bayliss wrote:
How do I do the same for
border-top-width
border-bottom-width
You can't.
would it be:
border-width: Top Right Bottom Left?
This would always set all four border widths to some value, so it would not
be equivalent to the two declarations you mentioned.
Is there some
David Laakso wrote:
trevor bayliss wrote:
How can I condense this CSS? Is it possible? thank you
BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none;
BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none;
BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none;
BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none;
Looks like CSS generated by Interner Explorer when saving a page.
Yvan Daneault wrote:
I have include the following rule in my stylesheet:
p {page-break-inside:avoid;}
but it does not seem to work in most browsers, except Opera.
Yes, that's summarized
http://www.webdevout.net/browser-support-css#css2propsprint
as well as
Divya Manian wrote:
You can try using :first-line [1]. Probably use a br/ to separate
the lines? Not sure if it will work though (Certainly not semantic!).
It would work technically well (:first-line has been in CSS since CSS 1.0
and is widely supported), but introducing an extra line break
Chike Loney wrote:
I ddint use a parent ul
An li element without a parent ul or ol is a syntax error. All bets
are off, CSS-wise and otherwise, then.
but even though the text in the li is not wrapping,
You're not explaining what text is not wrapping in which sense. You need to
provide a
ray wrote:
Look at this page http://soundbowl.com/views/test.html. What I expect
is to make the long text separated by '/' character wrap at the '/'
or white space character. Also, FF and IE seems have the different
layout. Can somebody give me some advice? Thanks in advance.
It would be
Christopher R wrote:
I'm trying to stylize the text which is an a tag within the id
videogallery
as seen on this page
http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/site/animationpage2.html
so that I can move the text here but all that seems to be moving is
the flash icon here is my style that I have
Michael Stevens wrote:
Calibri I have but do not have installed all the time and use it maybe a
couple times a month. And I've never heard of Vrinda.
I picked up Vrinda after considering the material at
http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-WindowsResults.shtml
and noticing that
Kathy Wheeler wrote:
Rather than blindly (bad term, I know) accepting the 100% font size,
wouldn't a better approach be to settle on a font-size that doesn't
make a client's site look like a kindergarten reader
I'm not sure why one's page should not be better than the crowd in
legibility.
Ian Young wrote:
http://www.dbadvertising.co.uk/dev/home-test3.html
The address image has extra space between it and the nav2 div above.
The page looks completely blank on my IE 7. No idea why. No fancy browser
settings right now, and other pages work normally.
On Firefox, I see the warning
Sandy wrote:
I am working on a French/English site and each side has words in the
other language. I want to make sure that screen readers switch
languages for those isolated phrases.
That's a noble goal, but it's a matter of HTML markup (using the lang or
xml:lang attribute or both). There's
Nicky McCatty wrote:
I want the Greek to appear on a web page.
As others have commented, this is not a CSS question. Moreover, a URL would
be needed for any constructive discussion.
Even with Symbol, I have unpredictable results.
This suggests that your entire approach might be completely
Sandy wrote:
Is there a way to get lists to use decimal points?
No, not in CSS in a manner that would work in most browsing situations.
Maybe you can use server-side generated content, so that the numbering
appears as part of the list items (in which case you would make the best
effort of
Bernat Lleonart wrote:
I usually specify font-size on the body as 1em,
Due to browser bugs, 100% is somewhat safer.
and then, as the main
text of the page has to be 12px,
If it has to be 12px, CSS is not sufficient, since you cannot force anything
in CSS. For example, a browser may have
Del Wegener wrote:
The Submit button (to the right of the search field) displays
correctly with a green arrow (a background image) in FF.
Where?
However, in
IE 7 the button is the wrong size and the background image does not
show.
Submit button sizes vary (and might be immune to CSS
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/01/04 00:54 (GMT) Thom Brown composed:
I've applied the following to a paragraph and notice that while it
correctly applies in Firefox, it won't apply any size changes in
IE7/8.
My observations are different. This may depend on the platform. (I'm using
Vista.)
Stephen Tang wrote:
I was recently taking a CSS online exam, and I ran into a question I
have never encountered before.
This list is devoted to discussions on practical use of CSS, but let's
imagine that long lines become a practical issue. Rare, but possible. A very
long URL, used for
JR Heard wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Dan Gayle danga...@gmail.com
wrote:
The full example can be found here: http://dangayle.com/test.html
Firebug isn't picking up any of the div.extra-info styles you've
defined in the head section. Solve that, and I'd bet you'll solve your
Vladislav Vladimirov wrote:
Is the HTML title tag not capable of receiving CSS styles?
- -
The title tag is not meant to be visualised, therefore should not be
able to accept css styles.
No tags are meant to be visualized. They are part of markup, and CSS is
applied to elements, not to tags
Tony Kay wrote:
I am trying to set up a style that puts a 2 pixel border around a set
of images. Then when the image is rolled over, I want the border to be
5 pixels. How is this done?
Please explain the idea more concretely. As usual, a URL would help. Do you
want a single border around a
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Angela French wrote:
Is there no way to get in between sizes?
Not on today's screens where a pixel is a screen-pixel.
Modern technology often makes subpixels available. It is unclear how they
should relate to the pixel concept of CSS, which is rather vague - it's not
Peter Bradley wrote:
I have a form that I can't get to format properly in IE (6 or 7).
It looks like you are using a definition list for the form fields. In
addition to being illogical, it also causes trouble in styling. The dl
element may have idiosyncratic rendering features in browsers,
Paul Jung wrote:
Please look at http://www.poet.sk/hidveghyova/go.php/component/id/12/
Did anybody have some experience? I got to know only yesterday when a
friend called me that he, with his IE browser, can not see this page.
I opened it in IE, and found out that the main content is after
Paul Jung wrote:
I used http://validator.w3.org to check a page:
http://www.europeeurope.net/index.php but it returned with such
erroe:
Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on line 454 it
contained one or more bytes that I cannot interpret as utf-8
This has nothing to do
Wade Smart wrote:
www.questrealtybartlesville.com
If you are viewing from Firefox 3.0.3 (and possibly other versions as
well) the header graphic had a blue line around it.
That's because it's a link.
Its a link back to
home from other pages.
Admittedly the border looks odd now. But I
Doug Jolley wrote:
The XHTML 1.0 DTD makes clear that the table element is a block
element.
Not really. Both in HTML 4.01 and in XHTML 1.0, the concept of block
element is obscure or at least vague, and it cannot be defined by the DTD,
which is purely a formal description of some features of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your reply. But when I use the suggestion for the css of
{display: block: text-align: center; display: bold;},
That's not what I suggested. Why don't you post a URL so that we could see
what your real text page is?
I'm using td.boldcenter for the
MEM wrote:
Is there a way to separate and underline from his text using CSS?
If I understand you correctly, you would like to put the underline that you
get with text-decoration: underline (either explicitly or via the use of
default rendering for links or u or ins) at a lower position than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to control the text in a td field with css?
Surely, with the usual CSS Caveats. However, as usual you need some handle
to the element, i.e. a selector that refers to the element(s) that should be
styled in a particular way and not to any other element.
201 - 300 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
