On 8/23/12, bho...@aol.com wrote:
> My first time trying CSS Tables, and I may have hit a wall. I'm very
> familiar with using HTML, and I guess I'm looking for something similar to
>
> HTML's 'colspan' in CSS. I've got an immense table with some rows spanning
> two
> columns. Most rows have t
My first time trying CSS Tables, and I may have hit a wall. I'm very
familiar with using HTML, and I guess I'm looking for something similar to
HTML's 'colspan' in CSS. I've got an immense table with some rows spanning
two
columns. Most rows have two cells.
So far, I can't find how to do
Le 14 juin 2012 à 16:19, Markus Ernst a écrit :
> I was not aware of the fact that HTML table elements can also be turned into
> block elements via CSS
Yes, one can do that. It is a bit quirky in IE 8 and 9 (the elements don't
really loose their 'tableness'), but that can be worked around by a
Am 14.06.2012 03:33 schrieb Philippe Wittenbergh:
Why don't you keep it as an html table, and then change the display value of
table, tbody, tr, td, etc to 'block' within a media query ?
Merci Philippe! I was not aware of the fact that HTML table elements can
also be turned into block element
On 6/13/12, Markus Ernst wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am not sure if this message has got through the technical problems, so
> I take the liberty to send it again - I apologize for the case it worked
> and just nobody had an answer.
>
> I have a form, which I put in a layout table:
>
>
>
> First
Le 14 juin 2012 à 04:25, Markus Ernst a écrit :
> I have a form, which I put in a layout table:
>
> ...
>
> In order to make it responsive, I changed it to s, and applied CSS
> display:table-* declarations.
>
> ...
>
> div { display:table }
> div div { display:table-row }
> div div div { dis
Hello
I am not sure if this message has got through the technical problems, so
I take the liberty to send it again - I apologize for the case it worked
and just nobody had an answer.
I have a form, which I put in a layout table:
First section of the form:
Mylabel
Hello
First, thanks to the css-d makers for your efforts to get this great
list back online!
To my question. I have a form, which I put in a layout table:
First section of the form:
Mylabel
... (more label/input pairs)
Other section, quite long title
Blake wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This will slow down
>> "new inventions" a bit - which is good
Actually, I said: "... which is good since the "conforming" browsers are
not as free of bugs as some may believe."
>
> What? Restricting innovation
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This will slow down
> "new inventions" a bit - which is good
What? Restricting innovation is never ever good. Ever.
This is why the development community has been bashing IE on the head
with a frying pan for as long as I can r
Kenoli Oleari wrote:
> ...
> The Sitepoint book proposes beginning to move away from IE 6&7,
> offering several strategies for doing this, all with the goal of
> pushing people to upgrade to IE8. It suggests that this is the
> beginning of a new cycle that will push CSS and site design to a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> discuss.org] On Behalf Of Kenoli Oleari
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:33 AM
> To: CSS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS tables
>
> The rant is fine, though the link you sent is
nal Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> discuss.org] On Behalf Of Kenoli Oleari
>> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 7:10 PM
>> To: CSS Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS tables
>>
>> The Sitepoint book proposes beginning to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> discuss.org] On Behalf Of Kenoli Oleari
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 7:10 PM
> To: CSS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS tables
>
> The Sitepoint book proposes beginning
Nearly every design I use that is anything other than pablum ends up
needing some kind of "trick" and often a different treatment for IE.
It is true that so many people have been working to get current CSS to
work that there is a "solution" for nearly every problem. This
doesn't mean ther
Blake wrote:
> Honestly I don't feel that restricted by current specs. Could you
> explain where you believe progress is necessary as far as layout is
> concerned?
We need ways to declare our own dimensional and positional relations
between elements, and table is actually preventing rather than
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I'm hoping to see something better than table for layout
> before too long, so we can have some progress.
Honestly I don't feel that restricted by current specs. Could you
explain where you believe progress is
Kenoli Oleari wrote:
> What do members of this list think about CSS-table styles for page
> layout now that IE 8 finally supports them?
CSS table comes handy if one wants to replicate the old/new HTML table
designs. Other than that "table" is a bit too inflexible design-wise,
regardless of suppor
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Kenoli Oleari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do members of this list think about CSS-table styles for page
> layout now that IE 8 finally supports them? I'm sure many of you are
> aware of the new Sitepoint book focusing on these styles and the
> future of CSS an
What do members of this list think about CSS-table styles for page
layout now that IE 8 finally supports them? I'm sure many of you are
aware of the new Sitepoint book focusing on these styles and the
future of CSS and suggesting that Microsoft's coming on board
standards-wise with IE8 is
Chris Akins wrote:
> I don't consider anything on that page to be tabular really. I think you
> should go with CSS and no tables.
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Juanita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're redesigning our recently redesigned (1 year old) site from a 2
>> column t
I don't consider anything on that page to be tabular really. I think you
should go with CSS and no tables.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Juanita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're redesigning our recently redesigned (1 year old) site from a 2
> column to a 3 column site.
>
> Here is th
Hi,
We're redesigning our recently redesigned (1 year old) site from a 2
column to a 3 column site.
Here is the current site, www.kcsm.org in which the main content is
database generated into tables, and then the tables are styled with CSS.
My co-worker and I are trying to decide if this databas
23 matches
Mail list logo
