Mark Fellowes wrote:
> I applied the IE hacks and found they made absolutely no difference.
You didn't apply them correctly then.
No big deal - the alternative you've found achieve more or less the same
for the fieldset/legend background.
> http://www.mattheerema.com/archive/getting-fieldset-back
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:58 AM -07:00
To: CSS List [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [css-d] Complex forms - is there a final consensus
I applied the IE hacks and found they made absolutely no difference. I went
back
PM -07:00
To: CSS List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [css-d] Complex forms - is there a final consensus
> [...] One question is running it through markup validation I see
> errors for not having an operning for code ending in . It
> seems though that I've seen it written that way b
> [...] One question is running it through markup validation I see
> errors for not having an operning for code ending in . It
> seems though that I've seen it written that way before so I'm not
> sure.
Trust the validator on this one. is the only correct way to write
a 'break' in XHTML 1.0,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:47 PM -07:00
To: Mark Fellowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [css-d] Complex forms - is there a final consensus
>I don't know if this will make a difference, but you don't have a complete
>doctype
Anyone, have an idea why ?
Mark
Mark,
> One caveat, on my IE it doesn't display at all. Only in FF
> http://pamshop.com/something/rails.html
It's completely blank in Safari 2.0.3, also.
Ted
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROT
Mark,
> One caveat, on my IE it doesn't display at all. Only in FF
> http://pamshop.com/something/rails.html
It's completely blank in Safari 2.0.3, also.
Ted
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/m
Actually it's not working in IE at all. Just had someone else check it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:06 AM -07:00
To: Mark Fellowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CSS List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [css-d]
>Complex forms - is there a final cons
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:06 AM -07:00
To: Mark Fellowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CSS List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [css-d]
>Complex forms - is there a final consensusJust my 2¢...In my new project >that
>I am working on, which is an X
I have made a couple of forms using the tag, that helps with
the problem of alignment. The guy over at style phreak has a great
example of how to implement it. Maybe it will help you.
http://www.stylephreak.com/index.php/archives/2004/08/standard-forms/
On Sep 21, at 8:06 PM[Sep 21] , Kevin
Just my 2¢...
In my new project that I am working on, which is an XHTML strict
version of part of my website, I elected to go with tables for laying
out my forms. I read a lot of the different things that were out
there, and I think that if you lay the tables/form labels, etc out
correctly
I have a form that is fairly large - 18 elements not including the submit
button. After trying a multitude of css styles and layouts I'm still looking at
a poorly layed out form. It could use at least 3 columns to fit nicely on the
page. So, I've done some googling and see the controversy of
12 matches
Mail list logo
