At 11:18 PM 1/19/2009 +0100, bruce.som...@web.de wrote:
condiional comments are claptrap of the top order.
Can you explain what you mean by that? As suggested here, I tried it
out (specifically to implement just those IE scrollbar features)
and it seems to work just fine.
Ron :?
Also, for a variety of different things (like link colors,
etc.) I
get a bunch of these warnings (not errors)...
You have no background-color set (or background-color
is set to
transparent) but you have set a color. Make sure that
cascading of
colors keeps the text reasonably legible.
Ron Koster wrote:
You have no background-color set (or background-color is set to
transparent) but you have set a color. Make sure that cascading of
colors keeps the text reasonably legible.
How on earth is that a warning? If I set a background color for my
links or whatever else, well,
At 01:16 PM 1/19/2009 +, Bobby Jack wrote:
Which validator are you using? It does sound like a flawed warning -
the validator should be intelligent enough to determine that a
background image/color will show through (and, thus, 'protect' the
color), at least in the trivial case.
Actually,
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/conditionalcomments
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
condiional comments are claptrap of the top order.
CSS is an interesting concept, but the implementation remains a bad joke!
Bruce
__
I know this topic has come up here before (because I've searched the
list archives), but I couldn't find what any ultimate recommendation
is over what to do.
I've got the CSS for one of my sites validating with no errors,
except for the styling of the scrollbars (for IE only, of course),
i.e.
Ron Koster wrote:
I've got the CSS for one of my sites validating with no errors,
except for the styling of the scrollbars (for IE only, of course),
i.e. scrollbar-track-color, scrollbar-face-color, etc. --
this/these alone are causing the CSS file to not validate. In
searching the list
At 04:00 PM 1/18/2009 +0100, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
If total validity matters and you want to keep the proprietary styles,
Conditionally Commented stylesheets for IE only stuff is an option.
This approach doesn't make the styles valid, but for most hidden is
good enough. Besides: the stuff will not
Ron Koster wrote:
Hmm... I haven't got a clue what you're talking about -- never heard
of conditionally commented style sheets before.
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/conditionalcomments
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
At 04:58 PM 1/18/2009 +0100, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Hmm... I haven't got a clue what you're talking about -- never heard
of conditionally commented style sheets before.
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/conditionalcomments
Oh! Thank you! I was going to just go search it
out myself (just
10 matches
Mail list logo
