[css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread Nic Pulford
Hi All, Just release a site that I thought was fully tested, but someone complained that the did not get a complete page load. They got no banner image and none of the menu links acted as a link. They are not terribly IT literate but could at least tell me they were using IE7. Any ideas?

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-28 Thread Nancy Johnson
The height issue is definitely fixed in IE6. The entity issue is only an issue in the address line, but is not an issue in the times that the restaurant is open, yet uses some of the same bullets. Can you use the same coding for the bullets in the address line that you use in the times that the

Re: [css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread David Laakso
Nic Pulford wrote: Just release a site that I thought was fully tested, but someone complained that the did not get a complete page load. They got no banner image and none of the menu links acted as a link. They are not terribly IT literate but could at least tell me they were using IE7. Any

Re: [css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread jdreid
Nic Pulford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Hi All, Just release a site that I thought was fully tested, but someone complained that the did not get a complete page load. They got no banner image and none of the menu links acted as a link. They are not terribly IT literate but

Re: [css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread Rod Castello
--- On Tue, 10/28/08, Nic Pulford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Nic Pulford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [css-d] Site Check. To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 10:44 AM Hi All, Just release a site that I thought was fully tested, but someone complained

Re: [css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread Nic Pulford
October 2008 12:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check. Nic Pulford wrote: Just release a site that I thought was fully tested, but someone complained that the did not get a complete page load. They got no banner image and none of the menu links acted

Re: [css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread tedd
At 8:14 AM -0700 10/28/08, Rod Castello wrote: Can anyone explain why the font-size gets smaller when the browser window size is decreased in width? I viewed it on Firefox 2 on a Mac. Nic, is this something that you planned in your design? Yeah, the guy is using a javascript routine that sets

Re: [css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
tedd wrote: Yeah, the guy is using a javascript routine that sets the size of the text and graphics to be proportional to the size of the browser window. Good thing browsers can override, or ignore, that auto-resizing for text, without turning off script-support - graphics still gets

Re: [css-d] Site Check.

2008-10-28 Thread Nic Pulford
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Castello Sent: 28 October 2008 15:14 To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check. --- On Tue, 10/28/08, Nic Pulford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Nic Pulford [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-28 Thread wwwebpro
, at 3:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:30:07 +0100 From: Gunlaug S?rtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2 To: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org, David Laakso

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread Nancy Johnson
The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is cut so only the bottom half shows. It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height. Nancy On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:25 PM, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread Frynge Customer Support
505 (United Kingdom) - Original Message - From: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 3:27 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn 10/25/2008 Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread David Laakso
Nancy Johnson wrote: The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is cut so only the bottom half shows. It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height. Nancy Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread Nancy Johnson
You could try that. I have done the same thing and it works. Nancy On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nancy Johnson wrote: The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-27 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
- Original Message - From: David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:49 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-27 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com 1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large gap you mention in any of my XP or Mac OS X 10.4.11

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-27 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
David Laakso wrote: Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com 1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large gap you mention in any of

[css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-25 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
10/25/2008 Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new Cedar Lake Inn index page and one interior page here, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-25 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: 10/25/2008 Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new Cedar Lake Inn index page and one interior page here, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html

Re: [css-d] site check

2008-10-21 Thread Frynge Customer Support
]; CSS-D css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 4:07 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] site check http://www.slrecords.net/new.php Frynge Customer Support wrote: Fix your style sheets for firefox, the fonts display quite a bit smaller for that browser. At what resolution are you

Re: [css-d] site check

2008-10-19 Thread Frynge Customer Support
-331-9684 (Toll Free - Canada and the USA) +44 (0)8717 206 505 (United Kingdom) - Original Message - From: Ed Pybus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CSS-D css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 3:42 PM Subject: [css-d] site check Hi, I've just kinda finished my (first) new

Re: [css-d] site check

2008-10-19 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
http://www.slrecords.net/new.php Frynge Customer Support wrote: Fix your style sheets for firefox, the fonts display quite a bit smaller for that browser. At what resolution are you comparing font sizes? At 96dpi Firefox has slightly larger font size than IE, probably because of different

Re: [css-d] site check - slreco

2008-10-19 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/10/19 18:07 (GMT-0400) Gunlaug Sørtun composed: Frynge Customer Support wrote: On 2008/10/18 17:42 (GMT-0400) Ed Pybus composed: I've just kinda finished my (first) new website - if anyone fancies giving a check over and letting me know of any problems they see that'd be much

Re: [css-d] site check

2008-10-18 Thread David Laakso
Ed Pybus wrote: Hi, I've just kinda finished my (first) new website - if anyone fancies giving a check over and letting me know of any problems they see that'd be much appreciated. http://www.slrecords.net/new.php Thanks Ed My morbid and twisted sister thinks you done good in Mac

Re: [css-d] site check

2008-10-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Ed Pybus wrote: I've just kinda finished my (first) new website - if anyone fancies giving a check over and letting me know of any problems they see that'd be much appreciated. http://www.slrecords.net/new.php IE6 drops #content below #sidebar. It's the 'width' on #content that causes

Re: [css-d] site check

2008-10-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: http://www.slrecords.net/new.php IE6 drops #content below #sidebar. It's the 'width' on #content that causes this drop ... An even simpler solution is to delete 'margin-left' on sidebar, and let IE6 use that space to splash its bugs. Then the 'width' on #content can

[css-d] Site Check

2008-10-13 Thread christianz
Here's a site I recently finished and it is up and running and I think it works pretty good but I just want other eyes to look at it and see if there's anything that needs fixing or could use enhancing: http://www.golfteesgalore.com/ Christian Ziebarth

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2008-10-13 Thread Wade Smart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a site I recently finished and it is up and running and I think it works pretty good but I just want other eyes to look at it and see if there's anything that needs fixing or could use enhancing: http://www.golfteesgalore.com/ Christian Ziebarth 20081013

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2008-10-13 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.golfteesgalore.com/ IE6 could do with some kind of compensation for its lack of opacity. Maybe some different backgrounds for that browser..? The script at the bottom should be above the end-tag for body. The HTML validator calls what you have an error. The

[css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-08 Thread Calliope Georgousi
Hi *Peter, I am new member and I am still finding my feet in this forum. I happen to have a similar problem, have tried everything and even though I am just a placement student , the professional staff doesn't know how to deal with this as well. so I created this website and no matter whether I

[css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-07 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
10/06/2008 Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. If it isn't, you'll see plain text *The Drug Affected Children Website* (it

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-07 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. Ok in IE6.

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-07 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: 10/06/2008 Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. Peter O.K. Mac OS X 10.4.11 Opera,

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC *round 2*

2008-10-07 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http://www.fatpawdesign.com/DAC/DACproducts.html All: Thanks for the look-see and feed-back. Georg: I think I have the transparent borders issue fixed. Would you please make another quick check? Borders ok. IE6 need a little bit more help though. 1: There's the

[css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

2008-06-30 Thread WEZ!
Heya all, Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html I've ran it through all the modern browsers on my work Mac and if anyone ideally could put it through its paces on IE6 that would

[css-d] Site check: IE6+7, FF 2+3 OK --- IE8 not so good

2008-06-30 Thread J.C. Berry
http://www.mindarc.com/buildpods/index.php Hello all, I wondered if you could look at this page for a minute. The top nav is broken in IE8. Thanks in advance! -- Jonathan Berry, M.A. IT Consultant 619.306.1712(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think the real reason the Extropy Institute closed is because

Re: [css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

2008-06-30 Thread Susan Grossman
Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html It does not render correctly in IE6 - the Gray areas (designed by and other) one floats all the way to the left and the other all the way

Re: [css-d] Site check: IE6+7, FF 2+3 OK --- IE8 not so good

2008-06-30 Thread David Laakso
J.C. Berry wrote: http://www.mindarc.com/buildpods/index.php Hello all, I wondered if you could look at this page for a minute. The top nav is broken in IE8. Thanks in advance! Zillions of very bright software engineers in Redmond are still crawling all over IE/8. At this point it is

Re: [css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

2008-06-30 Thread David Hucklesby
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:39:46 +0800, WEZ! wrote: Heya all, Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html I've ran it through all the modern browsers on my work Mac and if anyone

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2008-06-27 Thread Andrew Doades
David Laakso wrote: Andrew Doades wrote: I though this group would be the best place to get a full, detailed site check... http://weplan.co.uk/ Please and Thanks to all, Andrew Seems to do fine cross-browser on a Mac and PC. If you where to ask the same question over coffee,

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2008-06-27 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/06/26 16:35 (GMT-0400) Hakan K apparently typed: On 2008/06/26 20:32 (GMT+0100) Andrew Doades apparently typed: I though this group would be the best place to get a full, detailed site check... http://weplan.co.uk/ Logo image in upper left is awfully small for high resolution

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-27 Thread David Laakso
Professional Web Pages - Information wrote: Dear David, Thank you for your feedback - my apologies for a late response. What is the suggestion/recommendation/community view for font formatting with CSS? Regards PWP Would you please provide feedback for the website

[css-d] Site Check

2008-06-26 Thread Andrew Doades
I though this group would be the best place to get a full, detailed site check... http://weplan.co.uk/ Please and Thanks to all, Andrew No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1519 - Release Date: 6/25/2008 4:13 PM

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2008-06-26 Thread David Laakso
Andrew Doades wrote: I though this group would be the best place to get a full, detailed site check... http://weplan.co.uk/ Please and Thanks to all, Andrew Seems to do fine cross-browser on a Mac and PC. If you where to ask the same question over coffee, rather than this list, I

[css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-23 Thread Professional Web Pages - Information
To whom it may concern, Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au/ Thank you. Regards PWP __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ --

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-23 Thread David Laakso
Professional Web Pages - Information wrote: Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au/ Thank you. Regards PWP Is the blue block offset 24px on the left intentional? Some folks may have trouble with the tiny frozen fonts in IE. And not everyone will

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-23 Thread Alan K Baker
- Original Message - From: Professional Web Pages - Information To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:43 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please To whom it may concern, Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au

Re: [css-d] Site check - cristi

2008-06-13 Thread Cristian Palmas
2008/6/13 Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2008/06/12 17:09 (GMT+0200) Cristian Palmas apparently typed: The link is http://www.cristianpalmas.it. Classic example of web users' biggest complaint: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/SC/sc-crispa1.jpg http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designmistakes.html

Re: [css-d] Site check - cristi

2008-06-13 Thread Bill Brown
Hi Felix, Thanks for the useful links and for the advice. I overrode the default font-size settings in order not to break the graphic layout. Anyway, I will study as soon as possible solution to the home and blog links image problems and font-size problems. And I will see whether to change

Re: [css-d] Site check - cristi

2008-06-13 Thread David Laakso
Bill Brown wrote: Hello Cristian (Felix, et al), This recent email leaves me with a few philosophical questions, however: 1. If we can expect a user to know how to set their own default font size, can we (should we) expect them to know how to resize the font on a given page? I think

Re: [css-d] Site check - cristi

2008-06-13 Thread Felix Miata
On 2008/06/13 04:20 (GMT-0400) Bill Brown apparently typed: This recent email leaves me with a few philosophical questions, however: 1. If we can expect a user to know how to set their own default font size, can we (should we) expect them to know how to resize the font on a given page? 2.

Re: [css-d] Site check - cristi

2008-06-13 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Bill Brown wrote: 1. If we can expect a user to know how to set their own default font size, can we (should we) expect them to know how to resize the font on a given page? What the user knows is unknown to us, and what s/he does with what s/he knows or doesn't know, is also unknown. What

Re: [css-d] Site check - cristi

2008-06-13 Thread David Hucklesby
Bill Brown wrote: 3. What do YOU say to a client who asks you to make the default font size smaller? Georg Sørtun replied: You can say: OK, but it may not work as you want at the visitor's end, no matter what. If the client insists; just do it. From a design standpoint, I'd say

[css-d] Site check

2008-06-12 Thread Cristian Palmas
Hi List, I recently published my personal site and developed my personal CSS theme for Drupal 6.2. May some of you check the site with IE on Mac and, in general, with IE5.5, IE5.0, Opera and Safari for PC and Mac? I just tested the site with FF2, Safari 3, IE7 and IE6 on PC. It appears to work

Re: [css-d] Site check

2008-06-12 Thread Chris Akins
Site looks nice. Did you use/modify a 3-col template or create your own from scratch? I'm interested in just this sort of layout with fluid middle column, but fixed outer. One note - my personal opinion - is that the semi-transparent dropdown menus only serve to make it hard to read the menu

Re: [css-d] Site check

2008-06-12 Thread David Laakso
Cristian Palmas wrote: I recently published my personal site and developed my personal CSS theme for Drupal 6.2. May some of you check the site with IE on Mac and, in general, with IE5.5, IE5.0, Opera and Safari for PC and Mac? http://www.cristianpalmas.it. Nice visual. Drupal ain't

Re: [css-d] Site check

2008-06-12 Thread David Laakso
Cristian Palmas wrote: Thanks for the useful replies. RE: http://www.cristianpalmas.it/ Nice visual. Mac/Firefox/3.0. At 1024 +1 the blog drop-down draws an h-scroll bar (no big deal imo) The h-scroll doesn't matter (I just noticed it) and I accepted to see that

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-04 Thread Rob freeman
on the Order, FAQ and Contact US pages the leftcolumn-two div contains a child div called post which has some padding. This shifts all content down and across, not sure if this is intentional. lister 2008/6/3 Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Raven

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-03 Thread Raven Gildea
Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine Hi Lorraine: I'm seeing two small issues in IE5/Mac. On the

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-03 Thread Michael Adams
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Raven Gildea wrote: Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much!

[css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-02 Thread Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno
Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine __

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-02 Thread David Laakso
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine Looked fine to me in Mac

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-02 Thread Melbeach
Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine Everything works for me in Windows IE6 and Firefox. Only thing -

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-30 Thread David Hucklesby
On Thu, 29 May 2008 12:10:39 -0400, David Laakso wrote: re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove the menu to the left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6 does not support min/max). [...] Please see:

[css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Could someone please check just the home page for me at: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html My client tells me that the photo obscures some of the text using FireFox on a Mac. I don't have a Mac to check it on, but it seems fine everywhere else ... I wonder if it's a screen

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley: Could someone please check just the home page for me at: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html Sorry to reply to myself, but I've sorted it. It *was* a screen-size thing. I checked it out on my wife's eee PC. I've now given the photo a width of 80% and

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd Konstantin Kuchugurin: Piter try this p div style=position:relative;float:left;margin:10px 10px 0px 0px;width:Your_Pic_Width_Size_px;height:Your_Pic_Height_Size_px;img src=image_folder/Your_Image.jpg alt= //div Some text ... Much more text... :) /p This will be

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread David Laakso
Peter Bradley wrote: Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html If anyone has any comments on the site, though, I'd be very pleased to get any feedback. I'm a bit of a newbie to this CSS stuff, so any suggestions would be very gratefully received.

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi. Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of terminology I've missed, I think. Pixel font-sizes are not very user friendly. Yes, you're absolutely right. I hadn't realised I'd done that. Must

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread David Laakso
Peter Bradley wrote: Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi. Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of terminology I've missed, I think. re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html Let's just say, for the sake of

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: Let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that the length of the lines of primary content text (measure) may be a little long for those who view the page at screen resolution 1280 and higher (particularly in laptops). Ah. OK. Got you. I agree, as well,

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread David Laakso
Peter Bradley wrote: There are a couple of other things I've noticed, which someone might be able to help with: * Is there any way of stopping the navigation menu from wrapping when the screen size gets smaller. I'd prefer horizontal scroll bars, if it's possible * In IE6, the menu

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove the menu to the left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6 does not support min/max). This will avoid the h-scroll bar. The menu will

Re: [css-d] site check please

2008-05-27 Thread Rob freeman
thanks for the feedback guys... 2008/5/27 David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Rob freeman wrote: nearly there, please can you check this site for any obvious pitfalls... http://www.nest-life.com/update/ thanks No major issues that I could see in compliant browsers, or IE/6 IE/7. The

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

2008-05-23 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of www.whitehouseinwestbend.com http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always welcome.

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

2008-05-23 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of www.whitehouseinwestbend.com http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css Peter David: Thanks. I set the margins to -2px; and

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-22 Thread Karl Hardisty
On 22/05/2008, at 12:39 AM, David Laakso wrote: Karl Hardisty wrote: http://mothership.co.nz/blog All feedback greatly accepted. Karl It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl. Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct. Aside: The title of the document does not seem to appear in the

[css-d] site check please - WHIWB

2008-05-22 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
05/22/2008 Hi All: Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of www.whitehouseinwestbend.com http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always

[css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-21 Thread Karl Hardisty
http://mothership.co.nz/blog Our blog uses GridFocus from 5thirtyone.com with some custom modifications. Just now I've swapped the first and second columns around as I prefer the larger column to be in the centre, as (to me) it looks more proportioned. I've checked it in OS X: Safari 3+,

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-21 Thread David Laakso
Karl Hardisty wrote: http://mothership.co.nz/blog All feedback greatly accepted. Karl It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl. Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct. Aside: The title of the document does not seem to appear in the text. Font-scaling breaks the long word

Re: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems

2008-05-17 Thread Rob Emenecker
Bill and Chris, Thanks for your help. I was able to implement the expression value in the CSS as suggested, with a conditional comment targeting IE6. (I realize that using a conditional style sheet, probably was not necessary, but I felt strongly about keeping the *patch* focused on the one

[css-d] site check -- IE6 problems

2008-05-15 Thread Rob Emenecker
Hi all, The following site is working fine in IE7 and Firefox 2, but breaks down in IE6. Specifically the page sections containing the navigation bar and the content, are not filling down the page and stopping at the footer, along with scroll bars not appearing per the overflow: auto property on

Re: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems

2008-05-15 Thread Rob Emenecker
@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems Hi all, The following site is working fine in IE7 and Firefox 2, but breaks down in IE6. Specifically the page sections containing the navigation bar and the content, are not filling down the page and stopping at the footer

Re: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems

2008-05-15 Thread Chris Hardie
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Emenecker Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:18 AM To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems Hi all, The following site is working fine in IE7 and Firefox 2, but breaks down in IE6. Specifically the page sections

Re: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems

2008-05-15 Thread Rob Emenecker
Hi Chris, Thanks for the info. The general layout of the site, and the use of the AP divs, is to accomplish two very simple -- or what is simple with IE7 and FF2 -- things. First, the header and the footer regions get glued to the top and bottom of the viewport. This is working in IE6 okay as

Re: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems

2008-05-15 Thread Bill Brown
Last, I do know that the BOTTOM property is being honored, where I'm not trying to stretch something to fill the viewport, because the footer is fixed to the bottom of the viewport as it should be. Hi Rob, Nice site. I like the overall look and feel, now...onto your troubles. Your problem

Re: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems

2008-05-15 Thread Rob Emenecker
; 'Chris Hardie' Subject: Re: [css-d] site check -- IE6 problems Last, I do know that the BOTTOM property is being honored, where I'm not trying to stretch something to fill the viewport, because the footer is fixed to the bottom of the viewport as it should be. Hi Rob, Nice site

[css-d] Site Check // Acoustic Traditional.in

2008-05-02 Thread Rahul Gonsalves
Ref: http://acoustictraditional.in/ If anybody has a little free time, I would appreciate a quick check of the site (well, it's really just one page) above. Non-CSS comments are welcome; off-list. Best, - Rahul. __

Re: [css-d] Site Check // Acoustic Traditional.in

2008-05-02 Thread David Laakso
Rahul Gonsalves wrote: If anybody has a little free time, I would appreciate a quick check of the site (well, it's really just one page) above. - Rahul. ___ It looked and worked fine for me in IE/6 and IE/7-- same for Mac browsers. I'd ditch the widow (world), and

[css-d] Site Check Please

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Stoneback
As usual, I am back on the forum asking for a site check. Here are my known issues (as far as I can tell one is only visible in IE6 IE7): IE6 IE7 issue: The main navigation area located in the upper left area has spaces between the images I am using as links. This does not display this way in

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-04-25 Thread David Laakso
Matthew Stoneback wrote: IE6 IE7 issue: The main navigation area located in the upper left area has spaces between the images I am using as links. This does not display this way in any other browser (that I am aware of). They appear to be approximately 2 to 3 pixels in height. I may

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-15 Thread Valerie Wininger
Vizcaino To: CSS Discuss Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:31 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project Hello, I was given the CSS Zen Garden project as a design test and I have something up on my server that I'm working on: http://e7flux.com/csszengarden

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-15 Thread Elli Vizcaino
. www.theatreorgans.co.uk www.virtualtheatreorgans.com Admin: ConnArtistes, UKShopsmiths, 2nd Touch A-P groups Shopsmith 520 + bits Flatulus Antiquitus - Original Message - From: Elli Vizcaino To: CSS Discuss Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:31 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-15 Thread David Laakso
Elli Vizcaino wrote: http://e7flux.com/csszengarden/chaoticspring.html You have height:1%; on the below selector. You may (?) want to feed that only to IE/6, as compliant browsers might do better without it at +2 font-scaling. .p5 { height: 1%; }

[css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-14 Thread Elli Vizcaino
Hello, I was given the CSS Zen Garden project as a design test and I have something up on my server that I'm working on: http://e7flux.com/csszengarden/chaoticspring.html I've checked across IE6, 7, 8, FF Windows Mac and Safari Mac. They all seem fine except in IE6. The last time I checked

Re: [css-d] site check with mini problems

2008-03-29 Thread Ibrahim Y
Thanks All, everything seems fine now http://www.jordan-business.net/power30_08/ fixing columns' problem fixed height problem and character duplication problem. On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.jordan-business.net/power30_08/ BTW: you

[css-d] site check with mini problems

2008-03-27 Thread Ibrahim Y
Hi folks, I've this page http://www.jordan-business.net/power30_08/ everything seems to be OK, except for 1. I want to extend the background for 'right' div to be at the same height with 'left' 'center' , note that I'm using % width for each div. 2. on IE a character 'n' appear

Re: [css-d] site check with mini problems

2008-03-27 Thread Christian Kirchhoff
For problem one you could use some faux columns approach, like in http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns/ Give the form a background that mimics the columns. Best regards, Christian *Directmedia Publishing GmbH* · Möckernstraße 68 · 10965 Berlin www.digitale-bibliothek.de AG

Re: [css-d] site check with mini problems

2008-03-27 Thread Christian Kirchhoff
I am not sure what it is exactly, but somehow the last characters of the right column are appearing. In your example it was the n of Zina Shaaban. But if you delete some text, then one or two of the new last characters appear. If you delete everything but the header Influetials (which seems to

Re: [css-d] site check with mini problems

2008-03-27 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Ibrahim Y wrote: http://www.jordan-business.net/power30_08/ 1. I want to extend the background for 'right' div to be at the same height with 'left' 'center' , note that I'm using % width for each div. This will work, with minor additions to the markup/CSS:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >