On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> .hide and .paging have the same specificity. The last one in the
> source .css file then wins.
Yep see it now! Sorry couldn't see the wood for the trees.
Thanks,
Alex
__
On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Alex James wrote:
>
> Probably missing something obvious but why doesn't the hide class
> override?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CSS
> ---
> .hide { display: none;}
> .paging { background-color: #d6d6d6; display: block; padding:
> .5em 1em; width: 100%;}
>
> My only
Probably missing something obvious but why doesn't the hide class
override?
CSS
---
.hide { display: none;}
.paging { background-color: #d6d6d6; display: block; padding:
.5em 1em; width: 100%;}
My only thought is the display block, but can't explain why? Currently
only using IE6
JR Heard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Dan Gayle
> wrote:
>> The full example can be found here: http://dangayle.com/test.html
>
> Firebug isn't picking up any of the div.extra-info styles you've
> defined in the head section. Solve that, and I'd bet you'll solve your
> problem.
> (I
On 24 Dec 2008, at 17:44, Dan Gayle wrote:
> I am having a specificity problem that I need help with. I am trying
> to create an info box that floats to the right within my main content
> div that uses the cascade to supply the styling. The content of that
> info box needs to be marked up using pl
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Dan Gayle wrote:
> The full example can be found here: http://dangayle.com/test.html
Firebug isn't picking up any of the div.extra-info styles you've
defined in the head section. Solve that, and I'd bet you'll solve your
problem.
(I'd start by validating the CSS.
I am having a specificity problem that I need help with. I am trying
to create an info box that floats to the right within my main content
div that uses the cascade to supply the styling. The content of that
info box needs to be marked up using plain html elements, because the
content write
* Rick Lecoat wrote:
>I've just solved a problem on a page, but I don't understand why the
>solution works, and that bugs me, so I wonder if someone kind could
>fill in the blanks for me?
>
>Page in question: http://www.sandbox.sharkattack.co.uk/tempo/index.php
>Parse error - Unrecognized */
On 16 May 2008, at 15:00, Rick Lecoat wrote:
> I've just solved a problem on a page, but I don't understand why the
> solution works, and that bugs me, so I wonder if someone kind could
> fill in the blanks for me?
Hold up, I just found the culprit: a left over comment-closer (*/).
Dang, and I he
I've just solved a problem on a page, but I don't understand why the
solution works, and that bugs me, so I wonder if someone kind could
fill in the blanks for me?
Page in question: http://www.sandbox.sharkattack.co.uk/tempo/index.php
In the CSS, starting around line 331, I had the following:
Good afternoon Martin,
It was foretold that on 12/7/2007 @ 17:55:52 GMT+0200 (which was
12:55:52 where I live) Martin Heiden would write:
> If you want to style the links in the footer way different from the
> rest, use:
> #footer a:link { .. }
> #footer a:visted { ... }
> #footer a:hover
Olá Luc,
on Thursday, July 12, 2007 at 17:22 Luc wrote:
> Good afternoon list,
> In my footer i have links that in the hover state are underlined.
> Works in Opera, FF, Moz but not in IE7. For IE6 i had to add an
> aditional rule to make always show underlined (i can live with that),
> but
Good afternoon Alex,
It was foretold that on 12/7/2007 @ 16:32:51 GMT+0100 (which was
12:32:51 where I live) Alex Robinson would write:
> I can't see which links you mean. Could you be a bit more specific
> about ones you're on about?
The ones inside the footer: empresa, missão, clientes,
> In my footer i have links that in the hover state are underlined.
I can't see which links you mean. Could you be a bit more specific
about ones you're on about?
It's possible that you have been bitten by what I call fuzzy specificity
http://www.fu2k.org/alex/css/hacks/fuzzyspecificity
_
Good afternoon list,
In my footer i have links that in the hover state are underlined.
Works in Opera, FF, Moz but not in IE7. For IE6 i had to add an
aditional rule to make always show underlined (i can live with that),
but i was wondering if it's a specific IE7 problem?
http://www.dzinelab
Chris wrote:
> I have obviously failed to understand a crucial aspect of CSS which deems
> that the table row style declaration does not overwrite the previous style
> for a specific cell within that row. Please enlighten me!
>
Not all CSS properties are inherited. Background color is one of
Chris wrote:
> Hi, apologies for another post but I think a simpler example below is what is
> needed.
> I have obviously failed to understand a crucial aspect of CSS which deems
> that the table row style declaration does not overwrite the previous style
> for a specific cell within that row. P
Hi, apologies for another post but I think a simpler example below is what is
needed.
I have obviously failed to understand a crucial aspect of CSS which deems that
the table row style declaration does not overwrite the previous style for a
specific cell within that row. Please enlighten me!
Hi,
>I have a problem with the following style declarations with regard to
>specificity:
>li:hover table #one{background: red;} /* 0,1,0,2 */
>li li:hover #all{background: blue;} /* 0,1,0,2 */
>The comments at the end of the declarations are my understanding of the
>specificity. The first styl
On 19/01/2007 17:50, Chris wrote:
> Hi, I have a problem with the following style declarations with
> regard to specificity:
>
> li:hover table #one{background: red;} /* 0,1,0,2 */ li li:hover
> #all{background: blue;} /* 0,1,0,2 */
>
> The comments at the end of the declarations are my understan
Hi,
I have a problem with the following style declarations with regard to
specificity:
li:hover table #one{background: red;} /* 0,1,0,2 */
li li:hover #all{background: blue;} /* 0,1,0,2 */
The comments at the end of the declarations are my understanding of the
specificity. The first style appli
Thanks very much!
I used your solution #1 (removing the "div" from "div.column-
content). (#2 wasn't general enough for all the contexts I want to
use it.) And that worked: it underlined what I needed to have
underlined.
Thanks, too, for the two additional resources. The "Calculating a
sel
Jim Ratliff wrote:
>By default, my links within a certain are not underlined.
>
> div.column-content a {color: #ff0080; text-decoration: none;}
>
>However, I want some of those links to be underlined. So for those, I
>defined a style:
>
> a.force-link-decoration {text-decoration: u
By default, my links within a certain are not underlined.
div.column-content a {color: #ff0080; text-decoration: none;}
However, I want some of those links to be underlined. So for those, I
defined a style:
a.force-link-decoration {text-decoration: underline; }
To apply this
I have a tendency to over-complicate my css rules...
On 3/8/06, Els <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lorin Rivers wrote:
> > tap... tap... tap... Is this thing on?
>
> Nope - that's a fake one.
har.
so here's how I solved it, based on y'alls hints.
#content .nested li { font-weight: bold; list-style
At 10:31 AM 3/8/2006, Lorin Rivers wrote:
>I want to style an unordered list so that the "top-level" elements are
>bold with no bullets, while the items inside these have the bullets,
>etc...
>
>#content li
>{
> list-style-image: url(/images/bullet3.gif);
> list-style-type: none;
>
Lorin Rivers wrote:
> tap... tap... tap... Is this thing on?
Nope - that's a fake one.
> I want to style an unordered list so that the "top-level"
> elements are bold with no bullets, while the items inside
> these have the bullets, etc...
[snip code]
> I couldn't figure out a way to do this wi
tap... tap... tap... Is this thing on?
I want to style an unordered list so that the "top-level" elements are
bold with no bullets, while the items inside these have the bullets,
etc...
#content li
{
list-style-image: url(/images/bullet3.gif);
list-style-type: none;
line-h
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>On 10 Jan 2006, at 3:21 am, Adam Kuehn wrote:
>
> >>> [1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Home
> >>> >>> id="menu_about">About
> >>> [--more links--]
> >>>
>
>But in this case, the CMS (textpattern) and the plugin used for
>generating
On Monday 2006-01-09 15:07 -0500, Adam Kuehn wrote:
> Darn it. I hit "send" by mistake, before I verified this
> claim. That is, of course, not correct. Only one ID per element is
> allowed. I hate having to print retractions, but that's what I get
> for doing this stuff while I'm busy with
And now I see your retraction (sigh).
Ah well, maybe having the links in the archive will be of value if this
discussion ever comes up again :-)
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAI
> At 02:11 PM 1/9/2006, CJ Larson wrote:
>> > > > id="menu_about">About
>> >
>> > Note we have just changed the class="active" to id="active". Your
>> > global CSS file would then include something like this:
>> >
>> > ul li a#active {background-color: foo;}
>>
>>One note about this: now he has t
On 10 Jan 2006, at 3:21 am, Adam Kuehn wrote:
>>> [1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>>>
>>>
>>> Home
>>> >> id="menu_about">About
>>> [--more links--]
>>>
> id="menu_about">About
>
> The class="active" part is generated by your CMS, and you presumably
> had something in your g
At 02:56 PM 1/9/2006, Adam Kuehn wrote:
>At 02:11 PM 1/9/2006, CJ Larson wrote:
>> > > > id="menu_about">About
>> >
>> > Note we have just changed the class="active" to id="active". Your
>> > global CSS file would then include something like this:
>> >
>> > ul li a#active {background-color: foo;}
At 02:11 PM 1/9/2006, CJ Larson wrote:
> > > id="menu_about">About
> >
> > Note we have just changed the class="active" to id="active". Your
> > global CSS file would then include something like this:
> >
> > ul li a#active {background-color: foo;}
>
>One note about this: now he has two IDs inst
> Your original problem was that this selector was not sufficiently
> specific to override your other declarations for the anchor. I am
> suggesting that your content management system should generate
> something like this, instead:
>
> id="menu_about">About
>
> Note we have just changed the cl
At 01:11 AM 1/7/2006, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>>>[1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>>>
>>>
>>>Home
>id="menu_about">About
>>>[--more links--]
>>>
>>>
>>>Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>>>background. What should I do? This changes from page to page,
Hi Adam:
Adam Kuehn wrote:
> Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>
>> [1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>>
>>
>> Home
>> > id="menu_about">About
>> [--more links--]
>>
>>
>> Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>> background. What should I do? This changes from page
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>[1] http://www.littleandreid.com/mentaidyn/about
>
>
>Home
>id="menu_about">About
>[--more links--]
>
>
>Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>background. What should I do? This changes from page to page,
>dynamically, so I can't use the ID property
Diego:
diego nunes wrote:
>On 06/01/06, Rahul Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
>>background.
>>
>>
>Have you tried "!important"?
>.active { text-decoration: none !important;
>background-color: #
Rahul,
on Friday, January 6, 2006 at 16:03 Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>
> Home
> >About
> [--more links--]
>
.mainnav li a:link { text-decoration: none; color: #FFF; padding: 1em;
background-color: #000; line-height: 3em;}
.mainnav li a:hover { background-color: #FC0; color: #000; }
.mainnav li a
Dear All:
My first time using a CMS (TxtPattern), and I'm struggling a bit.
I'm trying to set the active link on this page [1], to a different color
from the rest.
Home
About
[--more links--]
Now, I want to assign the class "Active" to have the different
background. What should I do? This c
Reese wrote:
I'm having trouble with a moderately extensive site which has
only a rudimentary implementation of CSS. This is the CSS coding
relevant to my question:
4.
5. a {
6. color: #99;
7. text-decoration: underline;
8. font: bold 10px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
At 14:44 12-07-05, Smith, Sarah wrote:
>If I understand what he's saying, if you throw in font size and family,
>such as
>font: italic 900 100% verdana;
>it works (for me). You probably don't want to specify that every time,
>so maybe "shorthand" isn't the solution in this case.
A ha. Thank you
The O'Reilly CSS Pocket Reference by Eric Meyer states:
"This is a shorthand property used to set two or more aspects of an
element's font all at once. It can also be used to set the element's
font to match an aspect of the user's computing environment using
keywords such as icon. Note that if the
At 12:40 12-07-05, Sebastian Redl wrote:
>You can check your style sheet carefully for syntax errors that would
>make the UA ignore your styles, because as you have them now, they're
>correct and should override the earlier styles.
That's what I thought. Rebooting seemed to help, now I can make
On 7/12/05, Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a {
color: #99;
text-decoration: underline;
font: bold 10px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
}
a:hover {
color: 99;
text-decoration: none;
font: bold 10px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
}
>
Reese wrote:
> What can I do?
>
> Reese
You can check your style sheet carefully for syntax errors that would
make the UA ignore your styles, because as you have them now, they're
correct and should override the earlier styles.
Sebastian Redl
_
I'm having trouble with a moderately extensive site which has
only a rudimentary implementation of CSS. This is the CSS coding
relevant to my question:
4.
5. a {
6. color: #99;
7. text-decoration: underline;
8. font: bold 10px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
9. }
10.
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:51:21 -0400, Linda Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html [xhtml]
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css [css]
I have a specificity problem.
[...]
So, why are the default a: styles overriding these?
ld
I have
Try background: transparent or background: none on the li link navs
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html [xhtml]
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css [css]
I have a specificity problem. The last thing I added were the
default link styles at the very botto
what was the original link (you removed it from the
thread).
I'll take a look.
--- Linda Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Anthony wrote:
> > try putting your global style at the top, instead
> of
> > the bottom. It's a top-down processing.
>
> I already tried that, it doesn't make a diff
Anthony wrote:
try putting your global style at the top, instead of
the bottom. It's a top-down processing.
I already tried that, it doesn't make a difference. This is my point,
specificity should not be contingent on order in this case. I'm not
selecting via the cascade.
ld
--
Linda Dunn
try putting your global style at the top, instead of
the bottom. It's a top-down processing.
--- Linda Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In my test site here:
>
> http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html
> [xhtml]
>
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css
Hi all,
In my test site here:
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/index.html [xhtml]
http://www.seafoodlab.cmast.ncsu.edu/styles/sflabstyles.css [css]
I have a specificity problem. The last thing I added were the default
link styles at the very bottom of the page. However, adding this messes
55 matches
Mail list logo
