I am trying to set up a media query for my website. Here's a
hypothetical example of a query:
@ media and (max-width:600px) {
#stage {
width:50%;
clear:both;
}
}
What I'd like to know is whether this query will apply to all devices
whose maximum viewports are smaller than
I would recommend using min-width MQs. That will apply the styles to
devices whose width is AT LEAST as wide as the designated width in the MQ.
What I do is set base styles that apply to all devices up to the next
min-width MQ. These base styles cover the multitude of size differences. At
the
On Jan 10, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Chick Newman ch...@newmanveterinary.com wrote:
What I'd like to know is whether this query will apply to all devices whose
maximum viewports are smaller than 600 px, e,g, if it is only 380 px. If
not, does that mean I have to set up a max-width property
Am 17.06.2013 16:44 schrieb Olivia A:
But for the web page layout by default, (with no media query applied) ,
when i resize down the pages a propos.php and enregistrement.php; the
two containers (below the long picture ) which are floated elements don't
float as it should, but instead there is
Markus Ernst wrote:
I believe to have read that browser support for border-box is not
quite perfect (IE8 seems to have problems). I'd personnally change the
padding to %, so you can sum up to exactly 100%, such as:
.container1, .container2
{
width:45%;
padding:2%
}
Hello everyone,
I'm sending this message because I am stuck and don't know how to solve
this problem.
i'm new to media queries and wanted to try them out.everything work fine
for mobile and tablet version.
But for the web page layout by default, (with no media query applied) ,
when i resize
On Jun 17, 2013, at 7:44 AM, Olivia A onlinemedia...@gmail.com wrote:
But for the web page layout by default, (with no media query applied) ,
when i resize down the pages a propos.php and enregistrement.php; the
two containers (below the long picture ) which are floated elements don't
float
Don't know if you've found a solution, but I cam across this and thought I'd
share.
Just in case you or anyone else may find it useful for responsive web design.
Haven't worked with it myself, but looks like it is worth a try, and it's free.
Dreamweaver Extension:
On Jun 1, 2013, at 4:58 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
Don't know if you've found a solution, but I cam across this and thought I'd
share.
Just in case you or anyone else may find it useful for responsive web design.
Haven't worked with it myself, but looks like it is
I'm a retired and slightly obsolete programmer who wants to jump back into
the game. There seems to be a lot of work remodeling websites so they work
well with cell phones, and also a lot of work moving toward cloud-based
everything. I've got a good handle on the cloud based stuff.
But I'm
I recommend Mobile First and Responsive Web Design from abookapart.com as
well as peeking under the hood at sites listed at mediaqueri.es
HTH
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a retired and
Sorry to Tom for first sending this to him, not the list.
On May 20, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I recommend Mobile First and Responsive Web Design from abookapart.com
I'd recommend a book with the same title but with Jump Start at the beginning:
Jump
How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
resolutions for handheld less then 768?
Thanks
Carol
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Carol Swinehart
ckfswebdevelopm...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
resolutions for handheld less then 768?
Thanks
Carol
With no other info, I'll suggest using background-image: none;
A link
Why should we get rid of a piece of design when you have a CSS3 property
for that? Use background-size. It works. :-)
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012, Carol Swinehart ckfswebdevelopm...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
resolutions for
Why should we get rid of a piece of design when you have a CSS3 property
for that? Use background-size. It works. :-)
I would advocate setting it to background-image: none, because you save some
bandwidth and cache for the small device.
Rob Emenecker @
Le Apr 25, 2012 à 3:14 AM, Carol Swinehart a écrit :
How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
resolutions for handheld less then 768?
Only specify background images for devices / or better - windows / wider than
768px ?
div { background: lime; }
@media all
At 23:41 +0200 on 04/24/2012, Gabriele Romanato wrote about Re:
[css-d] Responsive Design Issue:
Why should we get rid of a piece of design when you have a CSS3 property
for that? Use background-size. It works.
Maybe since use of background-size assumes/requires that the device's
browser
18 matches
Mail list logo
