Alan Gresley wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
If a browser can't stack various layers of one element together in
the right order on top of all layers of another element, without
explicitly being told to group and stack element layers by using
a nonsensical property/value for the case, then it
Gunlaug Sørtun[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan Gresley wrote:
I know the fix/bug. As I said previously this is deeper.
Not deeper than how a rendering engine (all rendering engines) splits up
and treats elements as a set of layers which are stacked in a certain
order depending on rules - of which
Alan Gresley wrote:
http://css-class.com/articles/ursidae/bears5ddh-kbaccess.htm
Sorry, no use for testing anything, since you've tailored it to only
target the anchors - not every element in the page.
I'll do deep testing of IE8' element-layer stacking and handling when I
get around to
Alan Gresley wrote:
Why does IE8 take 25 minutes to install!
Would take ages to download at my end anyway, so I won't bother with
this beta version.
Well hasLayout, the float bugs, the margins bugs, Sticky hover bug,
Guillotine bug, Escaping float bug, Peekaboo bug, Relative position
bug
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
discuss.org] On Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 7:17 AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but still slightly broken
Alan Gresley wrote:
Why does IE8 take 25 minutes to install
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
Well hasLayout, the float bugs, the margins bugs, Sticky hover bug,
Guillotine bug,
Escaping float bug, Peekaboo bug, Relative position bug and z-index stacking
order
bugs are all fix. Hooray!
Well, yes, it's really nice to see so many
Its cool to have the option to see a page live in one of the three
compatibility modes you choose (Quirks, Strict IE7, and Standards IE8)
when the developer tools are opened.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
Bruno Fassino wrote:
Well, yes, it's really nice to see so many things fixed :-))
I haven't checked too much, but re floats, I confirm that there are
some new problems with the clearing. They range from the simple fact
that a clearing br doesn't work [1], to the fact that floats moved
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
[2] http://brunildo.org/test/clear.html (last test case)
The second test case (6th and 7th example) show display:table doubling your
border
on class=nextdiv. It should be 8px where IE8 is showing 16px.
So something is awfully wrong
Gunlaug_Sørtun wrote:
Alan Gresley wrote:
Well hasLayout, the float bugs, the margins bugs, Sticky hover bug,
Guillotine bug, Escaping float bug, Peekaboo bug, Relative position
bug and z-index stacking order bugs are all fix. Hooray!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
discuss.org] On Behalf Of Bruno Fassino
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 9:02 AM
To: Alan Gresley
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but still slightly broken
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Alan Gresley wrote
At 5:18 PM +0100 3/6/08, Bruno Fassino wrote:
I haven't checked too much, but re floats, I confirm that there are
some new problems with the clearing. They range from the simple fact
that a clearing br doesn't work [1]...
[1] http://brunildo.org/test/FloatContainer2.html
Bruno, could you
On Thu, March 6, 2008 7:07 pm, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Yep, the only issues I had to fix were related to the ieMac rules being
picked up and the links not being hot:
I'm curious as to why you would be fixing any of your own code to cater
for this early beta? The idea is that if your existing,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
discuss.org] On Behalf Of Nick Fitzsimons
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org; 'Bruno Fassino'; 'Alan Gresley'
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but still
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
At 5:18 PM +0100 3/6/08, Bruno Fassino wrote:
I haven't checked too much, but re floats, I confirm that there are
some new problems with the clearing. They range from the simple fact
that a clearing br doesn't work [1]...
[1]
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
On Behalf Of Nick Fitzsimons
On Thu, March 6, 2008 7:07 pm, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Yep, the only issues I had to fix were related to the ieMac rules being
picked up and the links not being hot:
I'm curious as to why you would be fixing any of your own code
Bruno Fassino wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
[2] http://brunildo.org/test/clear.html (last test case)
The second test case (6th and 7th example) show display:table doubling
your border
on class=nextdiv. It should be 8px where IE8 is showing 16px.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
discuss.org] On Behalf Of Alan Gresley
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org; 'Bruno Fassino'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but still slightly broken
Thierry
Alan Gresley wrote:
Gunlaug_Sørtun wrote:
http://tjkdesign.com/test/ie8/links.asp
That the same issue as I'm having with my menu.
http://css-class.com/articles/ursidae/bears5ddh-kbaccess.htm
It is similar as with IE6 requiring hasLayout and display:block on
anchors to make the
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I agree with Nick here. The band pass filter will be fixed in later beta.
Currently I think you can use this approach (untested).
imho, the fact that the band pass filter will be fixed or not is irrelevant,
because in any case I won't have anything more to do.
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Alan Gresley wrote:
Gunlaug_Sørtun wrote:
http://tjkdesign.com/test/ie8/links.asp
That the same issue as I'm having with my menu.
http://css-class.com/articles/ursidae/bears5ddh-kbaccess.htm
It is similar as with IE6 requiring hasLayout and
21 matches
Mail list logo
