Kathy Wheeler wrote:
> On 09/03/2008, at 6:40 AM, Karl Hardisty wrote:
>> A comparison of usage before and
>> after is generally a good idea. If a site design changes, and
>> suddenly a certain type of browser/platform combination drops off
>> markedly, there's probably a good reason.
>
> However
On 09/03/2008, at 6:40 AM, Karl Hardisty wrote:
> A comparison of usage before and
> after is generally a good idea. If a site design changes, and
> suddenly a certain type of browser/platform combination drops off
> markedly, there's probably a good reason.
However it may also pay to check ove
On 7/03/2008, at 8:29 AM, david wrote:
Karl Hardisty wrote:
> On 6/03/2008, at 7:03 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
> My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less
> than IE6.
> And if they do, well, it's just time for an
It's all about the user data, baby! We've got no people using anything
lower than IE6, so I test IE6, IE7, Firefox, Safari, Opera, and that's about
it. However, I'd really like to know how to test for those several WebTV
users we have visit our site every month (I didn't even know it still
existe
I agree with everything your saying David.
I was simply having one of those crap-tacular days and was trying to inject
some witty sarcasm into the thread.
It wasn't meant as a 'poo poo, why do you worry about that old text
browser?' comment. The exact opposite is true, we should worry about it f
Rob Emenecker wrote:
>> And remember this about logs: If you design a site that
>> doesn't work in browser X, after awhile, you won't have
>> anyone using browser X visit your site *because your site
>> doesn't work.* Then you'll pat yourselves on the back
>> and say, "See - no one uses browser
> And remember this about logs: If you design a site that
> doesn't work in browser X, after awhile, you won't have
> anyone using browser X visit your site *because your site
> doesn't work.* Then you'll pat yourselves on the back
> and say, "See - no one uses browser X." ;-)
... says the ge
Karl Hardisty wrote:
> On 6/03/2008, at 7:03 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
> My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less
> than IE6.
> And if they do, well, it's just time for an upgrade. I'm not jumping
> through
Mark Story wrote:
> So I just wanted to get an idea of what the oldest
> browser you are currently testing for is?
Lynx.
> And how are you targetting
> them? Hacks, conditional comments, other techniques?
None needed.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
_
On 3/6/08, Mark Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hernly, Lee wrote:
> > Netscape 4.X here...
> >
> >
> >
> When testing with an older browser such as netscape 4.x are you looking
> for identical results to current browsers. Or just 'good enough' results?
>
identical is impossible with Nets
Hernly, Lee wrote:
> Netscape 4.X here...
>
>
>
When testing with an older browser such as netscape 4.x are you looking
for identical results to current browsers. Or just 'good enough' results?
-Mark
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PR
> I test for SIMILAR results on Firefox2, ie6, and ie7 on pc along
> with safari on the mac and Konq on linux
>
> I test for 'acceptible' for ie5.5 on pc, opera, and ie5.5 on the mac
Ditto here. Basic "content can be viewed" testing for anything less than
IE6, FF2, Safari 1.2, or Konquerer (can'
Virtualization is great for this sort of thing; however, specifically
what I do is.
Opera and Netscape
The browsers allow for multiple versions coexisting on the same machine.
Firefox
I use a virtualization program for different older browser; however,
there are tips online for getting two separa
I test for SIMILAR results on Firefox2, ie6, and ie7 on pc along with
safari on the mac and Konq on linux
I test for 'acceptible' for ie5.5 on pc, opera, and ie5.5 on the mac
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discus
On 6/03/2008, at 7:03 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less
than IE6.
And if they do, well, it's just time for an upgrade. I'm not jumping
through
that many hoops to accommodate
Netscape 4.X here...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Story
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:36 PM
To: 'CSS'
Subject: [css-d] Oldest Browser Currently Testing for
It seems that my perception of in the wild browsers was a bit off.
As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less than IE6.
And if they do, well, it's just time for an upgrade. I'm not jumping through
that many hoops to accommodate so few IE 5 users.
And I make liberal use of conditi
17 matches
Mail list logo
