Ok, I'll play with it. Thanks.
On Saturday, July 16, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> Oh no, that is the part you needed to change Tom.
> I only set those to do that for the example to show you could set
> different sizes and it worked.
> If you set them to the same height
Oh no, that is the part you needed to change Tom.
I only set those to do that for the example to show you could set different
sizes and it worked.
If you set them to the same height and change the widths, I believe that is
what you were talking about.
If not, then good luck, I tried.. :)
Best,
This does not do what I was looking for. Images scale at different times
and are different sizes while doing so. Looks like flex is the best option.
Thanks for the time!
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Karl DeSaulniers
wrote:
> Hey Tom,
> I had this in my codepen. Made
Karl, I am using Linux Mint 16 with Firefox. My screen is big to bigger
depending on the system I am using. I just checked using a narrow Firefox
window down to the minimum. I also use chrome from time to time. I tend
to avoid Windows and prefer Linux. I use LXLE, Mint, and currently Knoppix
Hmmm, interesting Philippe.
However there is sparse support for those.
I guess at the end of the day it is all about readability,
so I will most likely go the align left route with gritted teeth.
Thanks for the input. Great idea.
Too bad browsers cant display text like a word processor.
You
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>
> Your the second one to mention the justify text.
> I may have to look into that, but I really don't like align left.
> Either space between words or on the side of the whole paragraph.
> Personally I like the text
Thanks John. Your the second one to mention the justify text.
I may have to look into that, but I really don't like align left.
Either space between words or on the side of the whole paragraph.
Personally I like the text to make columns.
May I ask what OS or device/browser you were using? As
Hovering on links in (I think ) Services did not bring up more text.
Nothing.
I notice that on narrow views the justified text sometimes gets very wide
spacing and looks funny.
Otherwise a beautiful site.
--- John Andrews
--- John Andrews
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Karl DeSaulniers
Correct. Thank you MIke.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Mike O'Toole wrote:
>
> There's an R missing in the URL - it should be http://turnkeysolutionsinc.com/
>
> Mike
>
> On 07/06/2016 09:38 AM, Tom
There's an R missing in the URL - it should be
http://turnkeysolutionsinc.com/
Mike
On 07/06/2016 09:38 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
I'm getting a server error.
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Hello Tom,
As well as everyone else. Can I invite you to
I'm getting a server error.
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> As well as everyone else. Can I invite you to take a look at a new website
> of mine?
> Please let me know if it breaks for you? Should be fully responsive "as
> in" you can
My apologies to all. There was a typo in the url. (Thanks Philippe!)
Time for bed.
http://turnkeysolutionsinc.com
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>
> Hello Tom,
> As well as everyone
Hello Tom,
As well as everyone else. Can I invite you to take a look at a new website of
mine?
Please let me know if it breaks for you? Should be fully responsive "as in" you
can shrink the window and it responds.
TIA
http://tunkeysolutionsinc.com
@Tom — if you take a look at the images on
Hey Tom,
I had this in my codepen. Made a few adjustments to taylor to your needs
(hopefully).
I "think" this is what you're going for. The :nth-child stuff is just for demo
purposes.
This also doesn't use flex. You will have to season to taste though and make it
work for you.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Chris Rockwell
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> OK, I think they should scale, by default, at the same time also. I'm
> apparently pretty dense this week but are you finding otherwise? Consider
> this: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/GqmdxG - is that the
Hi Tom,
OK, I think they should scale, by default, at the same time also. I'm
apparently pretty dense this week but are you finding otherwise? Consider
this: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/GqmdxG - is that the behavior?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:37 PM Tom Livingston wrote:
> On
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Chris Rockwell wrote:
> If this layout were in a narrower viewport than shown, and keeping
>> the grid as shown, in my mind the graphics in the middle row would begin to
>> scale before the rest.
>
>
> For clarification: are you saying that's
>
> If this layout were in a narrower viewport than shown, and keeping
> the grid as shown, in my mind the graphics in the middle row would begin to
> scale before the rest.
For clarification: are you saying that's how you think it should work *or*
that is the desired effect you're going for?
Thanks Karl
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> (Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but
> this is both combined. Sorry for the spam)
>
> Hi Tom,
> I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers
(Sent two messages before this one. Not sure if they made it through, but this
is both combined. Sorry for the spam)
Hi Tom,
I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to
100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set.
The max-width size keeps them
Hi Tom,
I would have IMGs set to 100% width height auto and the IMG containers set to
100% width except they have a max-width and min-width set.
The max-width size keeps them from becoming too large on a big screen and the
min-width keeps them from becoming too small.
Any width that is between
21 matches
Mail list logo