On 12/23/2005 12:24 PM Richard Brown wrote:
Hi Francesco
On 23 Dec 2005, at 18:33, Francesco wrote:
Could someone with Opera check it out for me?
Much appreciated!
I am sorry to say that you are right. Opera on a Mac is showing the
bullets. I have sent you a screen shot in a different
Francesco wrote:
http://blackcoil.com
It shows the UL
on the home page with round bullets even though I
styled ULs to not have bullets.
http://www.browsercam.com/projects/216074/4480723.jpg
Francesco
Opera9preview1
I see a lot of fuchsia but no bullets :-) :
http://www.dlaakso.com/coil.jpg
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:32, Steve Clason wrote:
On 12/23/2005 12:24 PM Richard Brown wrote:
Hi Francesco
On 23 Dec 2005, at 18:33, Francesco wrote:
Could someone with Opera check it out for me?
Much appreciated!
I am sorry to say that you are right. Opera on a Mac is showing
Francesco wrote:
...
http://blackcoil.com
Browsercam ... shows the UL
on the home page with round bullets even though I
styled ULs to not have bullets.
.
For Opera8, replace
#mainMenu {
...
list-style: none inside none;
}
with
#mainMenu { ...
list-style-type: none;
Hi Francesco,
Re: http://blackcoil.com and the unwanted list bullets:
You have this in your style sheet:
#mainMenu {
margin: 120px 0 0 0;
list-style: none inside none;
}
Try changing the list-style to list-style: none;
Cordially,
David
--
David Hucklesby, on 12/23/2005
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi Guys
I thought this design was finished but I am advised that when looking
at it in Internet Explorer the text is to small to read and the right
column drops down. Could someone just look to confirm for me please
that this site is alright. I think what has happened is
In particular, is anyone else seeing issues with Safari / working OK in
Safari?
thanks.
On 12/20/05, mat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy Winter Solstice / Christmas.
Site check please: http://ekstasis.net/
__
css-discuss
mat wrote:
In particular, is anyone else seeing issues with Safari / working OK in
Safari?
thanks.
On 12/20/05, mat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy Winter Solstice / Christmas.
Site check please: http://ekstasis.net/
FWIW, some Safari captures:
On 20/12/05, mat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Site check please: http://ekstasis.net/
It doesn't play well with large font sizes.
http://dorward.me.uk/tmp/ekstasis.png
--
David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukhttp://blog.dorward.me.uk
Catherine Post wrote:
http://www.catherinepost.com
Links don't work without javascript enabled, so my guess is that that's
the show-stopper.
Other than that I can't see anything wrong, although all pages I visited
looked slightly broken because the layout is unable to take the stress
of
Richard Brown wrote:
I thought this design was finished but I am advised that when looking
at it in Internet Explorer the text is to small to read and the right
column drops down.
I _do_ get a longer right column in MSIE than in mozilla (I'll send you
screendumps), but it looks quite OK to
Ryan wrote:
Good morning,
This is my first post to CSS-D and I wanted to start with a
site check.
I have been working on a homepage mock up for a near by
village. Please look
it over and give me your feedback. Since this is only a mock
up, the code is
poorly organized. I am mostly
link: http://extranet.baxterwoodman.com/roulk/beta
Looks fairly good in IE6 and Firefox 1.5 on my PC here. Two things I
noticed. One is that your background seems to not extend all the way down
the page, as it switches to white edges about half way down the page.
Secondly, your two main
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Dear All:+
http://littleandreid.com/rc2/
This is a second check, after David, Felix and Kates' suggestions and
kind words from last week. I've tried to incorporate as many of these as
possible into the design/code.
Your friendly list maniac is back with some totally
Felix Miata wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
http://littleandreid.com/rc2/
2 .outerwrapper {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;}
Changed to plain {sans-serif}
That had no apparent impact, because you still have:
.text {font-family: Geneva, Arial, Helvetica,
Christian Montoya wrote:
Hello all, I have a site due Friday night and I'm just about done with
all the CSS. Please visit:
http://temp.rdpdesign.com/final/
There's the main site, and a link at the bottom to switch to a
simple style, and then there's also the sub site, which is at:
Christian Montoya wrote:
Hello all, I have a site due Friday night and I'm just about done with
all the CSS. Please visit:
http://temp.rdpdesign.com/final/
17 Linux/Mac/Win2000 captures
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=212715
http://temp.rdpdesign.com/final/ivy/
19
Thanks everyone, I think I fixed all the problems mentioned. I used
display:inline on the navigation instead of floats and padding on
everything, works fine. I'm using @import to hide from old browsers. I
also set the default text color. Let me know if there are any more:
Joshua Roark wrote:
I have a site I am working on and it is a WordPress template used as-is per
client request. I don't currently have Win/IE 5.x available to test the site
layout. I am told the site breaks unpleasantly in Win/IE 5.x and some
assistance would be appreciated. Presently, I
On 12/6/05, Virtuallee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, everyone for previous site checks for me. I have another one,
which I'd appreciate a check on, especially those with macs.
http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/HSW/index_test.html
Appreciate it.
Lee
I see the text in the rounded buttons pushed
Virtuallee wrote:
Thanks, everyone for previous site checks for me. I have another one,
which I'd appreciate a check on, especially those with macs.
http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/HSW/index_test.html
Appreciate it.
Lee
I do not know what I would do with my time if I did spend it writing to
Oh yes, FF 1.5
Now your only problem is that the text flows out of the buttons on the
left. Because the buttons are of fixed size, and the text is huge.
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
Lovely site! I look forward to it going live! I bet my Mom will want to
visit those gardens after seeing your site ;-)
In the sub-pages under design philosophy, the images went below the fold
(off-screen) and therefore the Read More links were out of site - I had to
scroll every time to get
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Dear All:
I've been working on a site for a Landscape Design/Build firm. Please do
look at it and give me some feedback.
Thanks to Georg Sørtun for his help earlier this month.
http://littleandreid.com/beta/
Warmly,
Rahul.
That guy that wrote about Arial,
On 12/5/05, Virtuallee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however I can only guess something interesting is happening on mac IE5.2.
http://www.brainnutrition.co.uk/index_test.html
Hi,
Looks fine in IE 5.2 Mac
Mindy
__
css-discuss
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I've been working on a site for a Landscape Design/Build firm. Please do
look at it and give me some feedback.
Thanks to Georg Sørtun for his help earlier this month.
http://littleandreid.com/beta/
Warmly,
Rahul.
t is a very nice, clean site, Rahul.
18 screen captures:
At 18:30 21-11-05, Roger Roelofs wrote:
http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab
Safari and ie5/mac render the page comparably to ff1.5rc3 except for
the right hand navigation. In ie, only on the About Monroelab page,
that stripe is too far right and the nav is below the content on the
re: http://www.inkworkswell.net/booth/monroelab/
At 23:36 21-11-05, Sasha Gerrand wrote:
In Safari (1.3 and 2), the menu on the right-hand side with the navigation
category text is almost starting to greek though (which might associated
with the 'small' declaration.).
Uhm, sorry. What does
On 11/26/05, Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
re: http://www.inkworkswell.net/booth/monroelab/
These are apparently invalid: #0147;solutions#0148;
According to: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/emen/
Do not, under any circumstances, use #147; through #149; for curly quotes.
You should use:
At 12:35 PM 11/26/05 -0500, you wrote:
In Safari (1.3 and 2), the menu on the right-hand side with the navigation
category text is almost starting to greek though (which might associated
with the 'small' declaration.).
Uhm, sorry. What does greek through mean in this context?
In
On (24/11/05 22:56), Adie Hart wrote:
The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html.
I don't have any consistend advices to give you, but I can confirm you the
page looks perfect on my GNU/Linux 2.4.29 box both with Opera 8.50, Firefox
1.5 and Konqueror 3.3.2 on my 15 LCD @ 1024x768.
Only
Adie Hart wrote:
I would really appreciate it if I could get a site check on a site that is
in production. The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. At present
only the homepage and main sub-pages work, although they do not have
content.
My main concern is achieving the correct layout
Adie Hart wrote:
www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html
The page is extremely vulnerable, and is breaking up and dropping
elements in all directions in all browsers, when just a little
font-resizing is applied.
Advice you to take another look at the layout, and add a bit stability
across
-d] site check please - navigation
Adie Hart wrote:
I would really appreciate it if I could get a site check on a site that is
in production. The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. At present
only the homepage and main sub-pages work, although they do not have
content.
My main concern
On 23 Nov 2005, at 3:04 pm, rashantha de silva wrote:
on mac it works on safari, firefox
opera has some alignment issues because the scroll bar props up and
disappears. if anyone has way of fixing this i would love to know how.
camino is not that bad.
ie 5.2 does not work with
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:21:56 -, Virtuallee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
Would someone mind doing a site check for me (especially mac since I
don't have)? None of the links work. I've just done the test page for
the home page which is designed for an 800x600 resolution.
b.t.w although
-3-
Font-sizing: Hardest to leave behind are my pixel-based fonts. :\ There
is a large difference between IE and Firefox, which I've slapped a
band-aid on for now... that Opera isn't happy with.
I've read about many people's preferences on this, but could use a lot
more. Opinions on the
rashantha de silva wrote:
every thing looks good on safari, but i need confirmation from pc users.
in virtual pc on my powerbook the flash edges seemed to be jagged.
windows users can you please check this on a desktop as well as laptops.
I'm not sure which i'm supposed to be seeing... but
L. Robinson wrote:
Converting legacy site to tableless layout and there are some advanced
(and not-so-advanced) cross-browser tricks eluding me. Having searched,
I'd be most grateful if someone can hit me with a clue stick on a few of
these.
Site here: http://beta.consupro.net/default_new.asp
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
One thing immediately stands out: you are declaring a font-size of 85% on
the body. As the standard browser font size is 16 pixels, and 85% of 16 is
13.6, you're starting from a baseline of 13.6 pixels. As you can't have
fractions of a pixel, you're pretty much bound
rashantha de silva wrote:
every thing looks good on safari, but i need confirmation from pc users.
in virtual pc on my powerbook the flash edges seemed to be jagged.
windows users can you please check this on a desktop as well as laptops.
http://idealzone.net/delon/
Just a reminder -- if
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
I personally find it useful to specify a font size of 62.5% on the
body, giving me a default size for 1em of 10 pixels. If I then want a
heading at 14 pixels, I can specify 1.4em.
Yes, it's a simple calculation - although not too precise across
browser-land.
However,
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
However, keep in mind that the 62.5% base may result in very, very,
large fonts if a user apply 'min-font-size'[1] in their browser.
Min-font-size isn't the only way for that to happen. User stylesheets
can do the same thing:
From: Donna Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i don't particularly like the bricks either but if you made them to be
unscrollable i think it would be neater. just add fixed in where
you're calling that image as background. (i think you have repeat just
add fixed after that).
done, and it looks much
Reese,
On Nov 21, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Reese wrote:
We are looking for feedback on
http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab
Especially from MacIE/Safari users. All comments on display issues
welcome.
Safari and ie5/mac render the page comparably to ff1.5rc3 except for
the right hand
Hi,
The site renders OK in all Mac OS X based UAs.
In Safari (1.3 and 2), the menu on the right-hand side with the navigation
category text is almost starting to greek though (which might associated
with the 'small' declaration.).
No major issues with Mac IE 5.2.
Cheers,
Sasha
On 11/19/05, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- The uppercase text in the header is /very/ difficult to read.
i agree to an extent - i'll look at it again
-- The color of the blocks of content text(their black-whiteness, not
hue) would be improved with more lead. And same above/below
olly wrote:
On 11/19/05, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- The uppercase text in the header is /very/ difficult to read.
i agree to an extent - i'll look at it again
-- The color of the blocks of content text(their black-whiteness, not
hue) would be improved with more lead.
Olly: i played around with your css last night using edit css from
the Firefox web developers toolbar.
i don't particularly like the bricks either but if you made them to be
unscrollable i think it would be neater. just add fixed in where
you're calling that image as background. (i think
olly wrote:
http://www.nealemarriott.co.uk
At 1792x1344 on Linux, the main P text height is the same height as the
bricks background, which produces a somewhat irritating effect. Maybe a
little bigger text would help, maybe a little more transparency to the
background image.
The all caps text
At 4:57 PM +0200 11/16/05, Schalk wrote:
Greetings All
Hopefully this will be the last request for a review of this site:
www.volume4.com/tc/ Thank you all in advance.
On Mac, Safari, when I hover over the nav bar, the hover state seems
to be taller than the normal state? This results in an
The top nav looks good in XP IE 6.0 and latest FireFox, but I wanted to
mention one thing, from a usability standpoint.
The page links are underlined until you mouse over them, and then the
underline decoration disappears. This is a bit confusing on pages like
Trish Meyer wrote:
At 4:57 PM +0200 11/16/05, Schalk wrote:
www.volume4.com/tc/
It looks like the photo should be the same height as the left column
(nav bar) area, but the left column is taller.
You can't do that without sizing things in px. To me it's obvious it
can't be, though maybe
Schalk wrote:
Greetings All
Hopefully this will be the last request for a review of this site:
www.volume4.com/tc/ Thank you all in advance.
On zoom FF gets it right-- the nav container expands vertically, and
throws h1. IE only /looks/ correct on zoom.You ignored Georg's
comment
Schalk wrote:
Greetings All
Please have a look at: www.volume4.com/tc/
One problem I am aware of and would like suggestions on is the top
navigation. In Firefox it is perfect but, in IE the padding, margin,
background color etc. is totally wrong. Thanks!
Sent this earlier as a
Charles Dort wrote:
If you'd be willing to glance at this index page
http://www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/index.html
http://www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/css/allsaints.css
Theophan (Charles) Dort
xp_sp2 ie/ff/opera
Looks good to me, Charles.
Some suggestions:
body { /* deleting
It's good, the only thing is if you are trying to avoid a horizontal
scrollbar at 800x600, you need to make it about 2 pixels more narrow.
--
--
C Montoya
rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
__
MANY thanks to those who replied on the list and privately with very helpful
observations and information about my site. I was dismayed to see that in
IE5/Mac there are serious problems, and I'm going to think about taking the
advice to assume hardly anyone uses that browser. I'll see if I can
Looks good on Firefox (WinXP).
Only thing I might change is the search box. It has a red background,
matching the red background of its surrounding element. Your search box
might stand out better (and therefore be used by more people) if it was a
different color. Perhaps a light grey, for
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of css-dan
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:12 AM
To: css-d@lists.evolt.org
Subject: [css-d] Site check: Mainly windows machines
Thanks !!
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/rxforsurvival/
Hi,
I echo Gale's thoughts, about the
Chester Bullock wrote:
Just completed a CSS implementation of a site for a client. Have a
couple of forms that were table based that I need to clean up, but I
wanted to see what people's experiences were on various platforms and browsers.
http://www.mountain-living.com
Chester, [EMAIL
On 1 Nov 2005, at 12:37 am, Ingo Chao wrote:
I mentioned in another thread [1] on that URL Christian provided that
#rightnav a:active,
#rightnav a:focus {outline-offset: -1px;}
seemed to fix it at that specific moment in Fx1.5beta2 (Mozilla/5.0
Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Bug 286368
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286368
I think.
The outline-offset is as good a workaround as possible.
Thanks, Philippe :)
Interesting discussion, I hope they don't ship 1.5 with the need for
that workaround.
Ingo
--
Travis Barden wrote:
http://www.omega-tek.com/index.php
Hi,
Firefox v1.0.7, Windows XP-SP2
I don't think it's been noted yet, but at 800x600 I get a slight (about
30px) horizontal scroll.
On http://www.omega-tek.com/contact/contact.php some of the content in
the center column overflows the
At 03:46 AM 31/10/2005, Bala Clark wrote:
hi,
Earlier I asked for help with getting drop shows on my blog, I've
solved that problem now and would appreciate some feedback on the
design. I've simply modified one of the defaut blogger.com stylesheets
with my own css. Right now it seems a little too
Bala Clark wrote:
hi,
Earlier I asked for help with getting drop shows on my blog, I've
solved that problem now and would appreciate some feedback on the
design. I've simply modified one of the defaut blogger.com stylesheets
with my own css. Right now it seems a little too blue, any other
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Thank you Ingo for the fix earlier on in development. Much appreciated!
http://janaagraha.org/rahul/elastic/news.html
A small site here. It was designed with 800*600 in mind (I'm almost
afraid to say that, given the recent discussion on fixed/fluid width
sites that the
Hi Rahul -
From Mac OS 10.4, Safari 2, it looks fine, 'tho elastic John is fixed
(stays out of text, as he should).
Using IE 5.2, John sticks to right side of window - if window is
small enough, he intrudes on text - and if the window is short and
it's scrolled, the image gets hacked up by
http://test.upc-orlando.com 3 column (home page)
http://test.upc-orlando.com/ministries/children 2 column
http://test.upc-orlando.com/gallery/gallery02.html 1 column
I'm not a pro so be kind ;)
No pro here either. I also just work pro-bono for non-profits. But I've
received much help
CUT
I use 100.01% and can't remember the exact reason for the
fraction. I believe to work around an earlier Opera problem ...
I found a brief explaination at the end of this page (Listing 16)
http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=FAF76print=true
Mark.
Using Safari, the drop-downs on Resources and About are initially a bit
narrower than the tabs, then quickly expand, but the difference remains
visible on mouse-off.
On Oct 18, 2005, at 12:00 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Site: http://www.chispaconsulting.com
CSS:
Quoting Sam Leathers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The site for the new page is http://www.markcreeves.com/newphp/index.php
The only thing I don't like about it is the left column news and contact
info, but the person I'm building it for has stated he wants an image
there rather than text for some reason
The site for the new page is http://www.markcreeves.com/newphp/index.php
The only thing I don't like about it is the left column news and contact
info, but the person I'm building it for has stated he wants an image
there rather than text for some reason he couldn't clarify. The navbars
changed main font to 12px.
Sam
Christian Heilmann wrote:
The site for the new page is http://www.markcreeves.com/newphp/index.php
The only thing I don't like about it is the left column news and contact
info, but the person I'm building it for has stated he wants an image
there rather than text
Christian Heilmann wrote:
http://www.mepush.com/sandbox/village/
Decided to knock another one out tonight, well at least get started on
it. This one is really basic right now, just a nav bar content section,
and a couple of absolute positioned images. no links work, just the
front page right
http://www.mepush.com/sandbox/village/
I have to scroll right and left to see the whole screen.
Linda H
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Linda H wrote:
http://www.mepush.com/sandbox/village/
I have to scroll right and left to see the whole screen.
It's a fixed width design more than 800px wide:
#navmap {width: 344px}
#contentwrap{width: 350px}
#toprightimage {width: 180px}
Total: 874px
--
Be quick to listen,
Great looking site! (checked Opera 8.5, Firefox and IE)
Two edits I would recommend:
indicate in the code that the spanish on the home page is spanish (lang=es
I think).
escape the in the breadcrumbs: gt;
The other thing I don't know if you did on purpose or not: the list items in
the
Hi Jenny,
I like the way your site looks. Clean looking and easy to navigate.
Since you were asking about conformance to web standards, you'll want to run
it by the w3c validator: http://validator.w3.org/ Your home page -- the
only one I ran -- throws 5 errors and a heap of warnings relatig to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Site: http://www.chispaconsulting.com
CSS: http://www.chispaconsulting.com/mjc.css
You've sized all your text in px, which frustrates IE users who need to
be able to see it at the size they prefer, but cannot due to IE's
unfriendliness in this regard. Because of a
RKN Studio wrote:
Just getting ready to launch a new line for the customer. The mail for isn't
working here - but I know that works.
http://www.rknstudio.com/sites/mlpformen/home.html
Mac users input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ron
www.rknstudio.com
A few Mac screen captures:
At 10:04 AM 10/4/2005 +0100, Mike Davies wrote:
I would appreciate a check on this new site, particularly in MacIE.
Not a MAC, just Opera 7.54 on XP, the links look like they are
strike-through (works fine on Opera 8.5).
HTH,
TTFN,
David
Director of Integrated Technology
CATALyST
Louisiana
Understood, but FOUC is kind of undesirable on this site, considering that
the content is meant to be hidden on page load. It makes one wonder, where
did the content go?
On 9/30/05, David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:44:36 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
(re:
I would appreciate feedback on the upcoming redesign of onlinetools.org:
Well then we'll see what we can do. :)
http://onlinetools.org/indx.php
When it loaded in FF Win 2K something very weird happened--I first saw
the Stuff / Tools section and then as I was starting to read it, it
On 29/09/05, Hershel Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on the upcoming redesign of onlinetools.org:
Well then we'll see what we can do. :)
http://onlinetools.org/indx.php
When it loaded in FF Win 2K something very weird happened--I first saw
the Stuff /
http://onlinetools.org/indx.php
When it loaded in FF Win 2K something very weird happened--I first saw
the Stuff / Tools section and then as I was starting to read it, it
disappeared. Same thing in IE Win 2K. That's not so good.
Ditto in Opera 8.5/Win2k.
Even worse, I was initially
One *small* detail: I didn't realise there was more information hidden
behind the navigation until I read the comments here. Why? Because I
often/almost always look at the status bar of my browser to look were links
take me ( that's probably a result of years of surfing and being taken all
over
seemed to have happened after trying to eliminate the Google Ads
overlay that was obscuring text, but since I can no longer see the
Stuff/Tools section, I can't repeat.
Yes, that seems to be an Opera Quirk, any idea how to prevent that? it
seems that even with the latest opera the
Great, now the links don't open at all???
I'm using FF 1.5 Beta
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org --
Christian Heilmann wrote:
Hi there,
I would appreciate feedback on the upcoming redesign of
onlinetools.org:
http://onlinetools.org/indx.php
Looks nice...
I'd include a redundant navigation system at the very top of the document in
case JS is disabled. So users don't have to scroll to find
Christian Heilmann wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on the upcoming redesign of onlinetools.org:
http://onlinetools.org/indx.php
I guess people don't pay any attention to sponsors anyway. :-p
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/onlinetoolsnew1.png
--
Cast your cares on the Lord and He will
Wow, more problems...
testing Opera 8, first of all, huge FOUC (flash of unstyled content).
Should fix that.
second: when opening a section, that google ad box doesn't reposition
itself, until I scroll.
once again, Opera 8.
Christian Heilmann wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am 99.9% complete. Just doing the final once over. Please take a
peak for me and let me know if anyones browsers are rendering crazy
things. Thanks
www.lice-control.com
Adam
Adam,
I can't tell you how much I enjoy reading about lice. Making this little
Adam,
About the floated img on the index page ...
the HTML
a href=store.htm target=_blank
img src=images/store_bage2.jpg alt=Visit Our Store width=240 height=190 border=0
class=store_badge
/a
Some explanation:
This floated image pushes its bottom boundary down over the next paragraph, this
It looks very good in IE6 and Firefox. Good job! But, there is one
little thing. If you increase the text size in both browsers, the text
boxes go buttons get distorted (positioning-wise). I realize that
most people will not change this, and I don't have the stats handy, but
it is something
Tim Zappe wrote:
http://www.western.edu/%21front%5Fsection/
Could some people please take a quick look in different browsers on
different platforms and let me know how the following page looks?
Most of my concern in in the search box. Any feedback would be a lifesaver.
It took a while
Looking good in my FF 1.6 and in IE 6.02 SP2 on XP! The only issue I
ran into was that the menu displays a big back box if images are hidden.
-Original Message-
I am 99.9% complete. Just doing the final once over. Please take a peak
for me and let me know if anyones browsers are
No probs in Opera 7.54 XP (SP2), however, there's a sentence that doesn't
make grammatical sense:
Like many ectoparasites (external parasites) that can endure starvation
and extremes of temperature, lice and their eggs can survive only under
relatively narrow set of environmental conditions.
Voices of CSM is a great website for a first attempt at CSS design.
All those having trouble designing with CSS should learn from this example.
If anyone has a moment and can check out my site (this is my first all CSS
site) - it seems to be okay in IE6, FF, Opera NN7, but I'm not sure
about
Juanita wrote:
If anyone has a moment and can check out my site (this is my first all CSS
site) - it seems to be okay in IE6, FF, Opera NN7, but I'm not sure
about other browsers or Mac.
I imported the stylesheet so as not to break in NN4, but haven't done a
more basic stylesheet for it
801 - 900 of 1089 matches
Mail list logo
