Dave M G wrote:
http://aimashou.jp/home_page
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/dmg/test_08_0310.html
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/dmg/test_08_0310_files/style000.css
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 10, 2008, at 12:44 AM, Usamah M. Ali wrote:
About havingLayout, doesn't IE7 need it? I thought hasLayout becomes
redundant in IE7, am I mistaken?
Oh, it definitely needs it, in different ways than IE
Kathy Wheeler wrote:
On 09/03/2008, at 6:40 AM, Karl Hardisty wrote:
A comparison of usage before and
after is generally a good idea. If a site design changes, and
suddenly a certain type of browser/platform combination drops off
markedly, there's probably a good reason.
However it may
If you have an HTML document that happens to contain another HTML
document in an iframe - and one of the two documents triggers quirks
mode when rendered by itself - is each one rendered in the same mode or
does the browser somehow do one in standards mode and one in quirks mode?
--
David
-Original Message-
Why are you suggesting in the first place to pollute your
source with different conditional comments on every single
page of a site. That seems like to much work and maintenance
for me. Is that what you do?
Well, the pages of the sites I work on are generated
I know that one difference between display:none and visibility:hidden is
that the former does not leave space in the layout where the code exists
on the page, while the latter does. Are there other differences?
Using visibility:hidden I have hidden a whole string of links I need on
the page to
At 22:36 -1000 9/3/08, david wrote:
If you have an HTML document that happens to contain another HTML
document in an iframe - and one of the two documents triggers quirks
mode when rendered by itself - is each one rendered in the same mode or
does the browser somehow do one in standards mode and
Mark Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why are you suggesting in the first place to pollute your
source with different conditional comments on every single
page of a site. That seems like to much work and maintenance
for me. Is that what you do?
Well, the pages of the sites I work on are
-Original Message-
From: Alan Gresley
Conditional Comments can be problematic to maintained and some
beginners
will start adding them to every page. Sometimes if it's not a
true CCS rendering issue at all but just incorrect
understanding of CSS or invalid CSS and markup.
I don't
I've seen a couple of other cases (not related to parsing/selectors
problems but to rendering) where IE8 quirks is equal to IE7 quirks
when this differs from IE6 quirks.
Also, I just noticed (again, this may be old news by now) that
fieldsets and input buttons (and presumably all form
Hi David,
I happen to be following this post closely, since Phoebe seems to have all the
questions I had.
I validated all my pages, with the validate site, both html css, fixed many
mistakes I have and learned a lot! (the only thing that didn't pass the
validation was the rss on this page:
Hi,
I'm modifying code from Stu Nicholls' Snazzy Borders code, referenced here:
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/boxes/snazzy.html
As he stated, this works in modern browsers. However, I tried putting
only a form field in here, and it blows out the spacing above and
below the content area in IE7 only.
Yes, I know, in a perfect site there's no need for hacks.
But this is a just slightly less-than perfectly coded site I did a year ago,
and it breaks in IE8.
I can fix most of it, but some widths in IE8 don't match up with widths in
FireFox, and IE8 ignores !ie.
So, does this mean conditional
Hi everyone, My site is near completion. The only problem is a
background image which appears next to the headings (Styles and
Effects headings etc..) seems to drop slightly in Firefox at work,
though it seems fine in Firefox and safari on my Laptop and PC.
I'm sure its to do with the headings at
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Eriol Hiragizawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm modifying code from Stu Nicholls' Snazzy Borders code, referenced
here:
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/boxes/snazzy.html
As he stated, this works in modern browsers. However, I tried putting
only a form field in
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Nancy E. Sosna Bohm wrote:
Yes, I know, in a perfect site there's no need for hacks.
But this is a just slightly less-than perfectly coded site I did a year ago,
and it breaks in IE8.
I don't think it is a a good idea to hack now for IE8, which is just a
Hi,
When we open a fixed width select control in a compliant browser it
expands the width of the open window in order to show the option
content larger than that fixed width.
IE 6 (don't know about IE 7) doesn't expands and crops the option
content larger than the width.
Is there a CSS way (no
Rob freeman wrote:
I'm sure its to do with the headings at 110% how can I make sure the
arrow icon always sits centred vertically next to the headings?
http://www.coloursense.net/testfolder/
Don't know why you get variations between two setups of Firefox -
different screen-resolutions maybe.
To second what bruno said, its worth investigating if its an IE bug or
failure to meet the 2.1specs or something wrong with your css and if the
problem is on IE side make sure that it gets reported via some channel.
its far to early to make an effort to start fixing things
- Rajat
Bruno Fassino
Nancy E. Sosna Bohm wrote:
Yes, I know, in a perfect site there's no need for hacks.
But this is a just slightly less-than perfectly coded site I did a year ago,
and it breaks in IE8.
I can fix most of it, but some widths in IE8 don't match up with widths in
FireFox, and IE8 ignores !ie.
Howdy,
I'm really ready to dump BBedit, and am wondering if anyone has a
good html/css editor with autocomplete like many of the current
tools, but also has the built-in ftp capabilities of BBedit? I am
seeing a lot of tools with one or two good features, but nothing
outstanding.
or so i think.
http://accuray.com/
my flash menu is in an absolutely position div. in ie6 ONLY, when you
roll over products or patients, the menu is cut off at the bottom of
the drop down.
I tried fooling around with the other positioned elements or removing
them altogether but it doesn't
Hello all,
I'm at validating the css stylesheet and there are two strange error
messages which i can't get rid of.
1)the first one is:
/Parse Error - body, div, dl, dt, dd, ul, ol, li, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5,
h6, pre, form, fieldset, input, p, blockquote, th, td { margin:0;
padding:0; }
/This
Hi Everyone.
I have started developing some test cases concerning issues with IE8 support of
display table properties. I am totally mystified by what I am seeing. I am
adding extra cases to understand what is happening. Any input, suggestions or
other examples would be very welcome.
The test
WeBuilder from Bluementals
http://www.blumentals.net/webuilder/
They have several different flavors with each supporting more flavors of
code. WeBuilder is their top of the line and supports php coding.
I've been using HomeSite forever and hoping someone would come along with a
piece of software
On 11/03/2008, at 12:34 PM, Michael Stevens wrote:
WeBuilder from Bluementals
http://www.blumentals.net/webuilder/
WeBuilder is windows only.
-Original Message-
Karl Jacobs
I'm really ready to dump BBedit, ...
BBedit is Mac only.
Unless Kar is dumping the Mac as well, WeBuilder
Jeff Gates wrote:
I know that one difference between display:none and visibility:hidden is
that the former does not leave space in the layout where the code exists
on the page, while the latter does. Are there other differences?
Using visibility:hidden I have hidden a whole string of links
On 11/03/2008, at 3:38 PM, Kathy Wheeler wrote:
On 11/03/2008, at 12:34 PM, Michael Stevens wrote:
WeBuilder from Bluementals
http://www.blumentals.net/webuilder/
WeBuilder is windows only.
-Original Message-
Karl Jacobs
I'm really ready to dump BBedit, ...
BBedit is Mac only.
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
2 b: make the background center vertically with the text-line - also if
the headline-text breaks into 2 lines:
#content h1 {
background-position: 0 .5em;
}
Note: exact em-value depends on case and size of background-image.
Since the background doesn't change size
I'm at validating the css stylesheet and there are two strange
error messages which i can't get rid of.
What are you using to edit your CSS file? The file appears to have
non-printing characters that do not appear to be standard CR, LF, or CR/LF
line endings.
What if you copy/paste your CSS
i hear display:none is bad for accessibility (screen readers, e.g.) but i
have no idea if visibility is any better. anyone know?
On 10/03/2008, Rafael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Gates wrote:
I know that one difference between display:none and visibility:hidden is
that the former does not
Sr. Flo Fluse wrote:
I'm at validating the css stylesheet and there are two strange error
messages which i can't get rid of.
flo
Wow! Uncompressing the file before posting to the list would be a nice
touch on your part...
I think if you delete the entire comment preceding the body
Gunlaug,
Thank you for responding.
Removing the position: relative; declaration from my #article DIV made
the bottom border lines appear as they should.
Adding the .class to the last item in the list does solve the problem of
the width of the main menu. Unfortunately, the menu is generated
Dave M G wrote:
Adding the .class to the last item in the list does solve the problem
of the width of the main menu. Unfortunately, the menu is generated
from within a CMS, and I can't quite get that solution to be
compatible with the PHP code that drives the HTML.
However, even though I
Aren't Mac people always bragging about how their machines can run Windows
better than a PC can? Shouldn't be a problem then... :)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy Wheeler
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:39 PM
To:
35 matches
Mail list logo