Hello,
Why aren't my active and visited link CSS commands working on my portfolio
page? I want people to know that they've already clicked on an image.
http://www.draftingservices.com/portfolio.html
Sincerely,
Brian
__
I just ran google's speed test on one of my pages and it reports many
inefficient rules. They are all of the form:
div#footer p
Is google telling me that the 'div' part is not necessary and that it
slows processing?
--
Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain but it takes character
and
Hello,
Why aren't my active and visited link CSS commands working on my portfolio
page? I want people to know that they've already clicked on an image.
http://www.draftingservices.com/portfolio.html
Believe it's the onclick event that's at issue. You're not actually going
to a page, so you
Believe it's the onclick event that's at issue. You're not actually going
to a page, so you haven't visited and the links don't change.
That's correct. The resource in the href attribute must be in the
browser history to enable the :visited state.
Chris
I just ran google's speed test on one of my pages and it reports many
inefficient rules. They are all of the form:
div#footer p
Is google telling me that the 'div' part is not necessary and that it
slows processing?
Most likely. Since an ID is unique to a document, the element type is
Susan Grossman wrote:
Believe it's the onclick event that's at issue. You're not actually going
to a page, so you haven't visited and the links don't change.
Chris Cressman wrote:
That's correct. The resource in the href attribute must be in the
browser history to enable the :visited state.
Susan Grossman wrote:
Why aren't my active and visited link CSS commands working on my
portfolio page? I want people to know that they've already clicked
on an image.
(I think the OP meant clicked on a link to see an image, as the links are
text links, as far as I can see, though it is not
On Jul 3, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
I just ran google's speed test on one of my pages and it reports many
inefficient rules. They are all of the form:
div#footer p
Is google telling me that the 'div' part is not necessary and that it
slows processing?
yes, that is about
On 7/1/10 8:34 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Just a quick reminder on something happened to me yesterday:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/07/internet-explorer-haslayout-and-ordered.html
HTH :-)
Thanks for the reminder.
Yes, layout seems to create as many problems as it fixes, or so it
I normally style my IDs as follows:
#footer p { } /* I don't use DIV before # */
#nav { }
#nav ul { }
#nav ul li { }
#nav ul li a:hover, a:active { }
Notice that each line follows/builds from the one before to ensure everything
is taken care of.
To validate your HTML and/or CSS I don't think
I normally style my IDs as follows:
#footer p { } /* I don't use DIV before # */
#nav { }
#nav ul { }
#nav ul li { }
#nav ul li a:hover, a:active { }
I guess you mean:
#nav ul li a:hover,
#nav ul li a:active { }
Notice that each line follows/builds from the one before to ensure
I hate to show my ignorance. But, I'm not familiar with the tern webkit
browser. I've done a Google search and the results still leave me confused.
Would someone please explain the term?
Many thanks.
Gail
Gail W. Issen
http://www.xpertwebs.com/ http://www.xpertwebs.com
Tel: 713-721-6868
Cell:
On 2010/07/03 18:35 (GMT-0500) Gail Issen composed:
I hate to show my ignorance. But, I'm not familiar with the tern webkit
browser. I've done a Google search and the results still leave me confused.
Would someone please explain the term?
Mozilla's Gecko is the engine on which Firefox,
On Saturday, July 03, 2010 7:35:47 pm Gail Issen wrote:
I hate to show my ignorance. But, I'm not familiar with the tern webkit
browser. I've done a Google search and the results still leave me
confused. Would someone please explain the term?
As Felix explained, there are many browsers
Gail Issen wrote:
I hate to show my ignorance. But, I'm not familiar with the tern webkit
browser. I've done a Google search and the results still leave me confused.
Would someone please explain the term?
Many thanks.
Gail
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit
http://webkit.org/
Tim Climis wrote:
On Saturday, July 03, 2010 7:35:47 pm Gail Issen wrote:
I hate to show my ignorance. But, I'm not familiar with the tern webkit
browser. I've done a Google search and the results still leave me
confused. Would someone please explain the term?
As Felix explained, there are
On 2010/07/03 15:56 (GMT-1000) david composed:
Tim Climis wrote:
There are other webkit browsers as well (Arora, Epiphany, and coming soon,
you
can set up Konqueror to use webkit as well, I hear).
It's not a you can set up Konqueror to use Webkit. KDE4's Konqueror
uses Webkit, no other
On Saturday, July 03, 2010 9:56:25 pm david wrote:
Tim Climis wrote:
On Saturday, July 03, 2010 7:35:47 pm Gail Issen wrote:
I hate to show my ignorance. But, I'm not familiar with the tern webkit
browser. I've done a Google search and the results still leave me
confused. Would someone
18 matches
Mail list logo
