ipt and no images. I've
even seen one method that uses an absolutely positioned round-style
bullet like the kind that's used in bulleted lists.
Check these out: http://delicious.com/Ghodmode/roundedcorners
There's also a script at curvycorners.net that should recognize when you
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:24 -0300, Milano wrote:
> For me, the simpliest way is using JQuery plugins. Curvycorners is one of
> them.
Curvycorners (http://www.curvycorners.net ) does work quite well, but
it's not a jQuery plugin. In fact, it causes problems with some jQuery
animations.
There is a
Try putting the image inside the list item...
list-style-position: inside;
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#propdef-list-style-position
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/list-style-position
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:25 -0700, Jack Blankenships wrote
align: left; border: 2px solid 00;} //need to add BG
> image and tarns\\
>
> div.transbox_h {width: 600px; height: 230px; margin: 0;
> background-color:#ff; border: none; filter:alpha(opacity=85);
> opacity:0.85;} //need to remove the effect of the trans from con
id="footer_tbl">
>
> ...
> href="contact.html">contact
> href="about.html">about
>
all the rules
about when margins do or do not collapse :
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#collapsing-margins
You probably need to change the DIVs that are inside of the LIs so that
the margins don't collapse. Maybe you just need to float the DIVs
On 11/12/09 17:38, Tim Climis wrote:
> ...
>> But I think your problem
>> looks like it's related to collapsing margins and you need to make your
>> vertical margins not collapse.
>>
> Actually, I need to make my horizontal margins to not collapse too. I want no
> margin collapsing whatsoe
This is redundant...
This is where it'd b anyway */
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
#thefold_wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 875px;
height 259px;
}
#fold_head {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
#fold_nav {
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
in a similar way to how we used to do it for
image rollovers.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.i
includes some CSS3 effects. I turned it into a blog entry.
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog/2011/07/css3-jumping-icons-revisited/
Any comments on the article are greatly appreciated.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
podcast and he mentioned that he feels his creativity is limited when
starting in a browser rather than in a graphics program.
What it comes down to is a matter of personal preference.
Why grey? I use #fee, #efe, and #eef... much less depressing :
The following is related to the grey boxes layout discussion we had
earlier, but I think it's just a coincidence... unless the author is
also lurking on the CSS-D list :)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:47 AM
Subject: [BP #4602] Blueprint placeholder images
To:
ve ul.nav a left margin of -220px (200 for the width and 20 for the
left and right padding):
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/list
ily property.
So, it will use "englishfont" even if that font doesn't have chinese
characters. You will probably need to wrap the Chinese text in a
different element and set the font-family to 'chinesefont' on that
element.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
___
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> 2011-07-09 19:58, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
>
>> > font-family: 'englishfont', 'chinesefont', Arial, sans-serif;
>
> [...]
>>
>> This fallback does not work for *single characters* in the font.
>
> That depends on the browser.
Nope, that's
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> 2011-07-09 21:19, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>>>> > font-family: 'englishfont', 'chinesefont', Arial, sans-serif;
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> This fallback doe
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Geoff Lane wrote:
> I'm directing this to the list because I feel it's relevant to the
> discussion. I thank the respondent for their input. However, I am
> respecting their privacy...
Thank you for redirecting it to the list. I intended to send it to
the list, b
cess to the head
> section and so can neither link style sheets nor create a style block
> and thus have no choice but explicitly style every element for which
> styling is required. Sorry if that wasn't made clear in my OP.
Sorry... I didn't read the OP carefully enough.
-
color: black;
border-width: 1px 0;
}
When there's only two numbers, the first one is for top and bottom,
and the second is for left and right.
It's really a matter of preference. There are a lot of "right" ways to do it.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:46 AM, John wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>> I prefer like this:
>> div {
>> border-style: solid;
>> border-color: black;
>> border-width: 1px 0;
>> }
>
>
> Thank you
ss on span.headtype ...
span.headtype:after {
content: ".";
color: black;
background-color: black;
width: 46px;
height: 14px;
margin-left: 6px;
}
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-d
behavior.
Aren't characters specified with entity codes also considered
"letters" in this context as opposed to "other content (such as images
or inline tables)"?
They often actually are letters from other languages, but not in this case.
The part I quoted is from the spec:
http
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:50 AM, John wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I think that 100% height is based on the inner height of the browser
>> window.
>> So, they are actually going to the bottom of that. However, the overflow
>
27 27 27 round round;
}
I'm sorry for my earlier mistake... and also for forgetting again that
this list doesn't have the "reply-to" go back to the list :}
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
&
they
told you how to fix it. I wanted to answer you question about why it
wasn't centered.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
L
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:57 AM, John wrote:
> Ghodmode;
>
> would you please clarify what you have below as "body:after"
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#before-after-content
http://w3schools.com/cssref/sel_after.asp
> Is this a different tag I'd be applyi
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:51 AM, John wrote:
> There is something I'm not getting about appliying/implementing this. I've
> read a couple of links discussing it, and I see how you can manipulate text
> in a number of useful ways..
It creates new content in your page without it being part of the H
bigger than the
browser window, but that doesn't make the browser window bigger.
>
> What's more than 100%?
The cumulative height of the content is (apparently) more than 100%.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
I wish to apologize for the accidental cross-posting and state for the
record that I hate this thing where the reply-to goes to the original
recipient rather than the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ghodmode
Date: Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Newbie has
ck from
current members.
Thank you.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Ghodmode wrote:
>>Is it a CSS-Discuss community policy, or the policy of an individual
>>who happens to be the list administrator? I suspect that it's based
>>on old practices for reasons that are no longer v
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Ben Henick wrote:
>
>> There aren't any contemporary email applications that can't handle
>> HTML. Is anyone using one?
>>
>
> There are very few that handle it genuinely well, and the most commonly used
> e-mail client implements an ancient rendering engine with
ost expedient solution for the
OP, but I admittedly didn't think too carefully about the quality of
either the original code or my solution.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Ed Seedhouse wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
> Any html email i get gets dumped straight into the trash bin by my
> mail reader, at my instruction. HTML is a web page markup language.
> Email is not the web.
Wow! ..
: Re: [css-d] [OT] Why no HTML
To: Ghodmode
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
I just performed a test with a short message:
Unadorned:
This is yellow. This is Garamond typeface. This is Comic Sans
typeface. This is BOLD. This is italicized. This is underlined.
This is in a different size.
Not
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Tim Climis wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 7:59:45 am Ghodmode wrote:
> > There aren't any contemporary email applications that can't handle HTML. Is
> > anyone using one?
>
> This obviously isn't true, as we
I can't argue with you there. These are legitimate concerns.
My email client doesn't show images in incoming emails unless I've
explicitly allowed it, but I guess that's not true for all clients.
> Besides, it might be embarrassing to send an html/css reply to a list
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Ted Rolle Jr. wrote:
>
> Here is the usual course of these conversations:
> People fight about something trivial (However, I don't believe this issue is
> trivial!)
> All leave the list forever for two weeks.
> Then come back and ignore each other.
I'm not going
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Mark Henderson wrote:
>
> On 20 July 2011 11:59, Ghodmode wrote:
> > Okay, so I change my email settings every time I send to CSS-discuss
> > so that it's plain-text, but I have to ask... why?
>
> In case you haven't already not
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2011 2:29 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>> I'm not going anywhere, but you have a point. Some people seem to be
>> disproportionately upset by the topic.
>
> The reason that text is used is mainly due
d Quirks mode.
Note that I've only used IE's "Developer Tools" Document Mode to test
rendering for earlier versions of IE. I haven't used the actual
earlier versions.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
___
ins, though.
In any case, I was referring to this:
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/wiki/Box_Model_Hack#Why_does_the_CSS_box_model_need_a_hack.3F
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss
-d/2011-July/106264.html).
I'd love to see a site that uses absolute length units :P
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#absolute0
> Thank you!
>
> John
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@
ame goes for the blocks
containing the text that you need to manipulate.
The logo has z-index:10 and the texthead and homebody has z-index:20.
The higher number is on top of the lower number.
It seems so simple, but somehow I a
for the image, but not for the
box containing it.
It could have been worse. If the containing block was the body and you
defined a size for the body as 100%, the captionedImage would have ended
up really large and the image slightly (20%) smaller.
--
Gh
SS file on the
list. I'm just wondering if there's a common element causing them.
What editor are you using for your CSS file?
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
htt
display: block;
float: left;
text-align: right;
padding-right: .5em;
width: 2em;
margin-left: -2em;
}
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.o
enbergh
> http://l-c-n.com/
>
Some related pages:
http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_gen_counter-reset.asp
http://help.dottoro.com/lckqqtdl.php
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discus
ren't showing that part). So, I think there must
be a list of predefined counter names somewhere.
For example:
chapter
section
subsection
item
imagenum
I could guess that "item" refers to any list item, but I don't have a
clue
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
> It's clearly not using classes or IDs. I see in some instances where
> you might be defining those names using the counters() function of the
> content property, but most of the usage examples I've seen aren't
>
a way to manipulate the automatic counter used by list items, but a
way to create a new counter that can be used by any element.
> <http://www.impressivewebs.com/css-counter-increment/>
> --
> Cordially,
> David
I like helping people solve problems on this list... it&#x
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Norman Fournier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a website at http://www.thehalcyoncore.com/
>
> I added a simple animation of "dripping paint" using Adobe Edge and liked the
> results. I then added a decorative font using @font-face and that seemed to
> break
: 0 auto;
position: relative;
left: -100px;
}
table.tabular-data {
width: 100%;
}
div.sidebar {
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
right: -100px;
}
n your print stylesheet. You could use one
class for everything you want hidden. Something like "not-printed".
> Thanks
> Rodrigo Ribeiro de Abreu
> Webdesigner (Brazil)
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
___
d, div#gmain3 isn't covered up in the browsers I've
tested.
> Regards,
>
> Beth Lee
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:48 PM, David Laakso
wrote:
> On 8/5/11 2:15 AM, Ghodmode wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Beth Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.callibeth.com/about.php
>>>
>> What did you mean by a "sticky" footer?
>
dy.
It could also be done with JavaScript:
var anchors = document.getElementsByTagName("A");
var i;
for (i=0; i
> All help gratefully received.
>
> --
> Geoff
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-disc
Why would you need to worry about screen size when making web pages?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Kashif
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mail
nt to be able to see the image without text in front of it, you need
to reserve some space inside the link's block for the image. That
would be padding-right because the background-position is right.
> Angela French
--
Ghodm
the container block and
border-radius won't hide its square corners, even though they're clear
because of the margins of the elements it contains.
In this case, the standard rounded corners and the old rounded corners
methods are incompatible.
>
the browser.
>
> Here is a test page demonstrating my dilemma:
>
> http://www.manicreader.com/testpage.html
Use float:left on the DIV#container, then on the element that follows
it, use clear:left.
> TIA,
>
> Barry Brevik
--
Ghod
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Lisa Frost wrote:
> The green bar (mainMenu) should be below the white menu (topMenu)in this
> design:
> http://www.mycfoasia.com/dev/
>
> css:http://www.mycfoasia.com/dev/css/mycfo_mainstyles.css
>
> I thought putting a clear:both on #topmenu would work:
>
> #top
ss-video-on-ydn/
Or just the slides:
- http://www.slideshare.net/stubbornella/object-oriented-css
> thanks!
>
> J
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.
the spec
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/) to clarify this, so can anyone
> here shed any light on the matter?
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Rick Lecoat
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discus
understand why
this is happening?
Banner
div.banner_placeholder {
width: 468px;
height: 60px;
background-color: blue;
color: white;
}
div.logo_block {
float: left;
}
--
Ghodmode
http://www.gh
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>> I have a problem where a DIV is behind a floating element. Given the
>> following code, the DIV.banner appears behind the DIV.logo_block at
>> the left e
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
> On 18/10/2011 9:14 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a
I was experimenting with media types in my stylesheet and I did the following:
@media screen {
div.screen:after {
displ
almost unusable. No noticeable slow-down in Chrome.
It seems like Mozilla should have already had enough time to regain
their place as the superior browser, if they could, but it hasn't
happened. For sites that incorporate HTML5/CSS3 or a lot of
JavaScript, Webkit has
om/archive/200405/equal_height_boxes_with_css/
PVII, it's time to update your site rather than promoting it by
posting outdated JavaScript-dependant solutions on a CSS mailing list.
--
Ebenezer Scrooge
a.k.a. Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
___
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Al Sparber wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 12:19 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>> display: table-cell
>> box-shadow: inset ...
>> border-radius: ...
>
>
> This tutorial was published in 2009:
> http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Tomasz Borek wrote:
> Ghodmode,
>
> What version of Firefox? I had no slowdown on AT-AT. Also:
I'm using FF8, but I think it might be because I'm on Linux. I think
I remember hearing something about FF having hardware-accelerated
graphics on
irksmode.org/css/display.html#t06
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-display
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#table-display
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#anonymous-boxes
>
> Many thanks in advance
t's okay. I don't think anyone uses Microsoft's browser any
more anyway ;)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc351024%28v=vs.85%29.aspx#border
If you really want to try it out with this obscure browser, I found
the fol
as the regular translate function. I must be
missing some detail.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
>
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
>
>
>
> div {
> position:relative;
> left:200px;
> top:200px;
>
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
>
> Am 28.12.11 11:39, schrieb Ghodmode:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Aaron Gray
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there another way with HTML 4.01 strict to vertically and horizontally
>>> centre
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Ghodmode wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I thought that, among the 3rd google logo or the 4th google logo, one
>> should slip above the other should slip under the previous log,
>> because the
email?
> Vincent
> PS Happy New Year!
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
P.S. 42
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incut
erbose=1&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.2
> The test page is catnaps.org/islamic/designtest.html
>
> - JL
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
een this article at quirksmode which I
think gives an excellent example: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
> Earlier I have declared the main.css (the one valid for all), with this:
>
> #some-selector {
> width: 16em;
> }
>
vascript dependency. The result uses
overflow:hidden on all of the page elements, then uses touch events to
control the visible part of the content.
http://cubiq.org/iscroll-4
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
>
>
>
> .top {
>
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-box-shadow
Unfortunately the webkit variation doesn't support the 4th number:
http://developer.apple.com/library/safari/#documentation/AppleApplications/Reference/SafariCSSRef/Articles/StandardCSSProperties.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001266--webk
ing.
Another way might be to actually put the image tag in there and use
absolute positioning and z-index to put it behind everything.
By the way, I didn't test any of this. So, if you use it or any
variation of it, you'll have to double-check the syntax.
--
Ghodmode
http://
nditional comments:
http://paulirish.com/2008/conditional-stylesheets-vs-css-hacks-answer-neither/
... but I'm doing User Agent detection in PHP on the server side.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
> --
> Debbie Campbell
> www.redkitecreative.com
___
off the property width:100% it fixes it. Unless they're
floated or have a fixed width, DIVs take up the available width by
default. By giving it a fixed width (100%), the width of the block
itself was 100%, then the borders added to that.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog
> Actual c
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Ghodmode wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:38 AM, BJ Novack wrote:
>> I've been banging my head against this for too long. Why does IE8 drop the
>> div class="checkout-progress" and everything below it right to the bottom of
design", and "media
queries"
Recommended reference material:
http://developer.android.com/guide/webapps/targeting.html
http://developer.apple.com/library/safari/#documentation/AppleApplications/Reference/SafariWebContent/UsingtheViewport/UsingtheViewport.html
http://
small experiment to tell me just that.
Continue reading →
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog/2012/01/i-have-a-really-big-m/
I appreciate any comments, questions, or complaints.
Thank you.
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com
_
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> 2012-01-24 8:23, Ghodmode wrote:
>
>> So, how big is an ‘em’? I set up a small experiment to tell me just
>> that.
>
>
> I don’t see the point of the blog entry or the experiment.
You acknowledged miscon
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/01/23 10:35 (GMT+0800) Ghodmode composed:
>
>
>> 960px is a good max width... for most site visitors.
>
>
> ...where "most" is as little as 50% + 1 of today's visitors. I consider that
> a gr
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/01/24 19:15 (GMT+0800) Ghodmode composed:
>
>> I don't know about the original poster's target demographic, but 960px
>> works well on a modern computer or a modern mobile device
>
> Debatable..
Thank you very much Paceaux. Youve made a number of good points. I
think I'll do a follow-up blog entry.
more comments inline ...
--
Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Paceaux wrote:
> I think other comments have kind of addressed that for most of us
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paceaux wrote:
> geeze, this morning I thought I knew this stuff. Now I'm lost.
See... it was a good blog entry... it made ya think :)
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-
x27;font-size'
property of the element on which it is used." That makes me ask
"Huh?! How is it computed? How big is an 'em'?!" If they just took
that word "computed" out of there, it would have been easier
om SmashingMagazine:
-
http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2011/12/12/an-introduction-to-object-oriented-css-oocss/
--
Vince Aggrippino
a.k.a. Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
htt
operties to the #container div and set
the background-color of the content div to white.
For more robust CSS3 support, I recommend taking a look at CSS3PIE.
It implements a lot of CSS3 features through an Internet Explorer
behavior and VML code.
--
Vince Aggrippino
a.k.a. Ghodmode
http://www.ghodm
reen:
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
--
Vince Aggrippino
a.k.a. Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com
>
> Thanks
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
ixels over to the left
because the link is just the text. But when the heading is inside the
anchor, the whole h1 is the link, not just the text.
--
Vince Aggrippino
a.k.a. Ghodmode
http://www.ghodmode.com
__
css-discuss [css-
ut, consider complementing it with
some kind of
tileable abstract background for the div.page which contains the
article. Or you could do something neat with gradients.
DISCLAIMER: I'm a coder. I've never been accused of being a designer :)
--
Vince Aggrippino
a.k.a. Ghodmode
http://www.gh
e-Chrome-Frame-and-P
I copied this from the HTML5 Boilerplate code:
It'd be a pain in the butt, but it would probably be possible to
emulate columns using Javascript. It might be an interesting
experiment, but I guess it would be a waste of time i
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
