Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote:
nov 12 19.14 COM:
This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration
tool?
Am I missing a concept here?
If it's
it is not getting used on
my page in Chrome and I'm seeing Lucida instead. FireFox is fine. Can
anyone think of why this might be? Does Chrome need the name written
differently?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
, having another
Trebuchet MS active, will mess up Chrome.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
in the article, under My
Account, if your mouse leaves the dropdown while attempting to login,
well... you can't
I understand why you'd use this, but I'm not a fan.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
it at the moment.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
, below a nav bar.
I guess this is as much a semantics question as much of a CSS question.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Ric Nudell rnud...@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting question. But I have always believed that the semantic ranking
of your headings (h1, h2, etc.) is about meaning, the importance of the text,
This is where I was heading. I have just put the h2 before the h1
-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:00 PM
To: CSS Discussion Group
Subject: [css-d] Visual styling vs. source order
List,
Hopefully this is related to CSS enough for this list...
Visually, the layout I'm looking at has a smaller line of copy, I'd
/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
criteria for a
larger width hasn't been met, it won't load the desktop size. In
desktop-first, it is seeing and downloading the styles/assets for
desktop and then they are being overridden and replaced by smaller
ones.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
After reading through your linked article, it would appear that it
doesn't matter whether you use mobile-first or not. Am I correct
listers?
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Bob Passaro bob.pass...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's
. Working on a new project
right now where this is coming up a lot.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
the same idea as the
mobile-first scenario. At desktop, the max-width: 600px MQ is not
being met, but the results show most download both images.
I'd be surprised if the results were any different if that test was a
mobile-first situation and that MQ was min-width: 600px.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
According to Firebug in FireFox, your span id=rdo is inside of
label id=search_store which, actually, is wrapping a lot of stuff.
That doesn't look right to me.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
/div
/body
/html
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
it needs to be.
As an example, i've got 8 page templates well under way and my
minified sheet is 23k. Does that sound bad?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Thanks Philippe.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 18, 2014, at 8:06 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 17 janv. 2014 à 23:58, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com a écrit :
As an example, i've got 8 page templates well under way and my
minified sheet is 23k. Does that sound bad
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:00 PM, SSC_perl p...@surfshopcart.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
If I may, maybe this will get you started:
Tom,
I'm sorry I didn't respond earlier. I had a coding problem that
needed to be fixed, and then after that was done
: 4px solid #99;
height: 120px; width: 120px; border-radius: 120px; margin: 0
auto 0 auto; }
/style
div class=wrap
div class=circle2div class=circle1 /div/div
/div
I would guess SVG might be better, but I am not familiar with it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End
Also, may be able to do it with a radial gradient and some
well-planned color stops, but you may be then excluding some browsers
you need to support.
You can play here:
http://www.colorzilla.com/gradient-editor/
HTH
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote
)
25%,rgba(0,52,120,1) 25%,rgba(0,52,120,1) 38%,rgba(255,255,255,1)
38%);
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(
startColorstr='#003478', endColorstr='#ff',GradientType=1 );
width: 120px;
height: 120px;
}
HTH
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote
correctly. Variations of the
equation i've tried aren't working.
What am I not grasping?
Thanks for your time.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com wrote:
If I understand it correctly, it's working the way you want - maybe there's
something else involved? http://codepen.io/anon/pen/hypoH
OK, thanks Chris. I'll start looking for other culprits.
--
Tom Livingston
there are other styles from somewhere else effecting
the pages? Also, to be clear, are you viewing in the same browser in
both cases?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2014, at 1:45 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 23 janv. 2014 à 03:34, Ed Pybus e...@slrecords.net a écrit :
've encounter an odd problem with display:inline-block. When I have the
website on a USB stick and open it in IE11 it opens as
/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
=circle1 /div/div
/div
I would guess SVG might be better, but I am not familiar with it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss
to be that long.
Possible to do this?
thank you!
John\
How about min-width?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
lidiv class=lengtha href=#The Rain in Spain stays Mainly in the
Plain/a/div/li
/ul
-
Rod Castello
Going this route, could you not just apply the width to the lis and
avoid the extra element?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
-decoration:none;
border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(0,0,0);
}
--
Cordially,
David
Ha ha. As always, I can't see the forest for the trees. Such a simple
solution David... :-/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2014-01-31 20:07, Tom Livingston wrote:
[...]
ul a{
display: block; /* - Add this */
[...]
Ha ha. As always, I can't see the forest for the trees. Such a simple
solution David... :-/
But to a problem
the “Home” nav elements would be visible on all other pages.
Thank you,
John
Normally, I just class a main wrapper (consistent on all pages) or the
body element and attack it that way...
.homepage nav a.home{display:none; visibility: none;}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media
is better? I don't technically know.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
usually still
display the link (text) but not as a working link (I assume the reason is
simply to prevent an unnecessary page load).
Agreed. I've done this as well. On home page, home link is highlighted
as the active page and isn't clickable.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer
it off-list.
Thanks for your time, and my apologies to list-mom for borderline
subject matter.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
-container
2) 'underlapping' the bottom of the page content a bit so some of the color
shows behind the content.
Hi Debbie,
Having a little trouble understanding what you're after. Do you have a
link to an image of the effect you are typing to achieve that we can
see?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
. This will prevent the
top of the image from getting cropped by footer-wrapper and you may
get more of the image peeking up behind your content.
Just a thought. HTH.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Firefox here: http://apsona.com/share/Selection_017.png
Thanks in advance for your guidance.
Sridhar
__
Adding overflow: hidden; to .main-menu-sub (to clear floating lis)
and width: 100%; fixed it here in FF 27.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Nancy Johnson njohnso...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a standard method to use media queries?
I took the W3C mobile course about 3 years ago and since then there
are many more devices out there each with different size and/or
retinal
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 4, 2014, at 4:32 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
in the case where you have section float left and aside float left, footer
clear both, is clear a hack?
In this case, no. Clear is in the spec.
…or is it part of CSS deliberately to handle such a
again just
for hack management.
I have to agree. It's been the least problematic solution i've tried.
I'm not sure what modern browsers have implemented to lessen it's use,
but in my case where I have to worry about browsers as far back as IE7
still, this works best.
--
Tom Livingston
;}
.clear:after {clear:both;}
.clear {zoom:1;}/* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */
While these definitions are using real in-the-spec css, they are
taking advantage of browser behaviors to cause a wrapper element to
contain floated elements within it.
Smarter people, feel free to correct me...
HTH
--
Tom
://www.samuelrossille.com/css-shape/
or
http://html-generator.weebly.com/css-shape-generator.html
complex shapes can be made by stacking same-colored simple shapes,
which is how the Simpsons ones were done.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:40 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On 3/6/14 12:37 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
You may be better off with SVG (or gif/png) for compatibility's sake,
ah..ok, that I can do. If I go with .svg, who gets frozen out? IE?
Looks like IE8 and below
http://caniuse.com
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Davies, Elizabeth
elizabeth_dav...@gallup.com wrote:
On the bright side, it's all getting gutted and nothing is sacred. It will be
a fun year.
You get a whole year?!? Lucky!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
http://www.quirksmode.org/mobile/metaviewport/
This has a good explanation of what it's for.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 9, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings to all,
I can't figure out why a webpage as simple as [2] renders text with
uniform size
-size-adjust: 100%;
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
help.
--
Hope this helps.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Brian Jones bdotjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have this demo setup here http://jsfiddle.net/dTsrY/ and i need help
with a few issues that i am having.
I am using bootstrap 3.0 and when
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Ezequiel Garzón garzon.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't explain what you mean with same size -- in a valid HTML5
document I wouldn't get that issue you claim -- nor do you post online code
as HTML/CSS. It's pointless to debate what you
/careers-header-bg.jpg) 50%
0 no-repeat;}
Some Googling produced nothing that will help.
Anyone have any ideas? Anyone know if there's a trick to this?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 14, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Georg ge...@gunlaug.com wrote:
Den 14.03.2014 16:55, skrev Tom Livingston:
List,
I have a page with multiple divs that have fixed backgrounds. This
isn't working in iOS Safari or iOS Chrome. Actually, not even a single
div with a fixed
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 14, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Vince Mendella vi...@graymatterstudios.ca
wrote:
Hey everyone,
Just wondering if there is a good place for tutorials to learn SASS or LESS?
And which one would be better to dive into?
May be 'holy war' territory. A lot is personal
in this biz, you never know if someone figured out a way around
it. Thanks.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
, but the sizes are ridiculously small.
I'm gonna guess that because there is no layout, the width of the page
is very large so it is zoomed OUT a great deal. Right? Am I missing
something?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
You could have the a be display: block; and add padding//bg color
etc. to achieve the look you are after. Remove the hover from the
li.
Or a as inline-block instead of block.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
padding//bg color
etc. to achieve the look you are after. Remove the hover from the
li.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
got them all on one line for me in
Chrome, without them crowding the rule at the edge of wrapper.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss
elements
with px (you can use px more safely here because they are imgs) may
bring results that are more similar.
This is just my gut feeling here. No science to back it up.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
guess here, but might you have used FF's font scaling UI
(View Zoom Scale Text Only) - scaled things down - and maybe left
it down?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:09 AM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On 3/17/14 5:56 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
One thing that may be happening is that you are spacing the icons with
ems, which is tied to font sizing. The math involved with the spacing
of the elements in #social is tight enough
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:22 AM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On 3/17/14 7:19 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
This link to a screen shot is Chrome on top and FF Aurora behind:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2616576/Screen%20Shot%202014-03-17%20at%2010.12.56%20AM.png
HTH
Yes
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:29 AM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On 3/17/14 7:24 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Sorry. I'm not sure what the discrepancy is. They look pretty similar to
me.
your screengrab shows them closer than my FF version, but why should there
BE a discrep?
Or better
The pen is working on my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2014, at 1:54 PM, SSC_perl p...@surfshopcart.com wrote:
I'm trying to implement this responsive table on my site:
http://codepen.io/sharifh/pen/imojf
It works fine in the Safari browser on my Mac when resizing the
!
__
I can't help still leaning towards browser settings. Have you double
checked that zoom/text scaling is at 100% in all browsers?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the updated link.
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Zoom and Text scaling is at 100% in all browsers. Arghh the text
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Zoom and Text scaling is at 100% in all browsers. Arghh the text won't look
right in FireFox, I don't understand, I was expecting this in IE, not
firefox.
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks identical, did you change any rule in the style sheet or nothing at
all ?
I changed nothing.
--
Did you edit browser
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks identical, did you change any rule in the style sheet or nothing at
all ?
I changed nothing.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank You for the help !
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question, how come when I hover over the word 'gallery
text ?
They overlap. Hit areas are on top of eachother. Not sure you can
avoid this as built.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss
pa href=This is a really long link to test line-height
on hover./a/p
/div
/body
/html
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss
;} helped
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
expectations of where breaks occur, but that's
another story...
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
, messing
up the floats. Adding min-height: 5em; to .robonav cleaned it up nice for
me. Adjust as desired.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css
, and Chrome showed odd char spacing.
Am I implementing something wrong, or do I need to write rules like
strong{font-weight:500;font-style:normal;} to have this work right?
Thanks in advance.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
-in-the-age-of-web-fonts/
and
http://css-tricks.com/watch-your-font-weight/
hope it helps
isabel
Thanks Isabel. All i can say is I'm glad it isn't a case of me just being
tick-headed. It's not just me.
I'll see if I can't come up with some sass for this...
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston
Thanks Isabel. All i can say is I'm glad it isn't a case of me just being
tick-headed. It's not just me.
Er, I mean thick-headed.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
what you mean.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:
2014-03-27 18:34, Tom Livingston wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
I suppose you are using some
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
pHi there span class=boldbolded text/span/p
pstrongI'm bold/strong/p
it is not aligning and in
others
it is. Any ideas how to fix? Hopefully this will be a learning
experience!
Thank you!
Can you be specific about what browsers aren't playing nice? I'm not seeing
the issue.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:14 PM, J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Firefox 28
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:58 PM, J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Thought I would just try this again
-- Forwarded message --
From: J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Graphic not aligning correctly
To: Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
oops. It's just Drupal when I'm logged in. I logged out and all is fine!
Thanks for the time
said, Felix can give far more knowledge on this than I can, but
to my eye, you are working harder to achieve the same thing and 100%
on the HTML respects a users default browser settings.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
text size and allow the text to scale up.
Why do I feel like you know this and meant something else with your question...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2014-04-07 15:51 (GMT-0400) Tom Livingston composed:
Barney Carroll wrote:
Please forgive the impertinent lurker here, but could somebody weigh in
with
why relative measures are necessary when the desired outcome
default) and There will be 1/2
the size of Hi.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Shari webweave...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use rem's it stays consistent from the body tag... correct?
Correct. It is relative to the root.
Shari
__
css-discuss
/a_fix_for_the_ios_orientationchange_zoom_bug/
When I changed orientation, the whole page was zoomed in so when you
click a photo, the modal is acting accordingly. If I zoom out first,
the modal works as desired.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
Typical text site : http://marden-prg.org.uk/
Typical graphic-dependent high-resolution site :
http://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/Hellenic-Institute/Research/Etheridge/
For what it's worth, a smart enough phone - like my iPhone - can render the
high resolution site mentioned above with
Also, we're drifting away from list appropriate topics...
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Chris Williams ch...@clwill.com wrote:
Philip, as I described in the message I just sent, I too am developing a
very complex and detailed application where I was convinced that one
I'm still experiencing the problem.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2014, at 9:37 PM, Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
d...@redkitecreative.com wrote:
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
again in portrait and landscape view in
an iPhone - this is the temporary URL:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/dev/aemb/class-photos/
--
Debbie
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Hahnel, Fred (DET-MRM)
fred.hah...@mrmworldwide.com wrote:
If not to use px for media breaks, what should be used?
-regards,
ems are becoming the preferred unit.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
queries.
So if I'm using 'px' now but would like to change to 'em', how do I calculate
how many 'em' to
allow for my 960px starting point ?
I like using this:
http://riddle.pl/emcalc/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
less. Maybe that will put
you on the right track...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
501 - 600 of 1154 matches
Mail list logo
