-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
Grupo de Sistemas e Redes
have relieved this. So you either set the size in pixels, or use
the same font (which you must ensure it exists in all client systems),
or you better use images and avoid a huge hassle.
Good luck.
Rafael.
[1]http://www.alistapart.com/articles/settingtypeontheweb
), but I think that's beyond what the standards
allow. Nevertheless, I wasn't able to find a reference to the second
point (...unable to be styled...).
Rafael.
[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#replaced-element
[*?*]/Needs reference/
[2]http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html
try with button instead...
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
this?
Yes: JavaScript.
It has no meaning for all the content to be inside an A element, so
you should do this by other means.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css
the vertical scroll bar on firefox?
That alone should do it. If it isn't appearing it may be because it
either isn't needed or you have another rule that overrides that one (or
maybe that one isn't applied at all).
Do you have any link to see it in action?
Rafael
quickLinks added to it, but in Safari it just isn't added at
all. This might have something to do with your swfobject.js file that
triggers a couple of errors in Safari (since it's actually an HTML file).
Regards.
Rafael
vincent pollard wrote:
hey rafael, thanks for your reply. the error was actually happening
before we added that js file.
I guess that has nothing to do, then. Still, it would be good to
correct that issue (an HTML file served as JS).
the quicklinks dropdown is .net control.
If you're
begins---
16
27
38
49
510
---div ends---
Is that even possible?
The good news: yes, it is possible. The bad news: you need either to
make sure all your client browsers support CSS3[1] or build a (JS)
script to do the dirty work.
Rafael.
[1]http://www.w3.org/TR
can access them, now whether it moves them, clone them, remove them,
etc. depends solely on the Lightbox implementation (i.e. I have no clue).
I hope this helps.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
be good to set line-height and position the
image at half that value. E.g.
line-height: 1em; /* Whatever value that's OK with you */
background-position: 0 0.5em; /* Half the value above */
Remember the order doesn't really matter, as long as they're in the same
rule set.
Rafael
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0600, Rafael wrote:
T wrote:
[···]
Use .png for the frame, cos it has excellent transparency support.
Yet another reason not to use it: PNG images don't work in IE6 (and,
although we all
regret this, IE6 is still
not be the best approach, but it's, like everything else, just
another try to avoid/minimize spam.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
David Laakso wrote:
Rafael wrote:
Well, let's try to bring it back in topic.
What I've done is to add some del elements with no-spam
legends, hiding them later on with CSS (and using JS to make it an
actual link). This may not be the best approach, but it's, like
everything
images don't work in IE6 (and,
although we all regret this, IE6 is still the dominant browser in the
real world).
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
-4px) shadows
but I never thought of using images too (duh!). I guess I'm definitely
not a graphic guy. Thanks for the insight :)
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
Ingo Chao wrote:
PS: did they say the new meta lets IE6 behave like IE8?
No, they said that the lack of it will make IE8 behave like IE7,
that is assuming you're talking about browser-version targeting (which
hasn't been accepted yet, AFAIK).
Rafael
to indent the code, or using
pbr/p to add some spacing.
I hope this helped, and sorry if I bored you along the way.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
Rafael wrote:
Chris Broadfoot wrote:
Rafael wrote:
Having separate style sheets usually helps to keep everything
organized (depending on how you build them), but it also gives you
more connections to the server. So what you can do is to make use of
that server-side language you have
);
}
header('Last-Modified: '. gmdate('D, d M Y H:i:s \G\M\T', $last));
ob_end_flush();
/off-topic
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
help it would be really nice to
have an idea of what you want (e.g. link to an image) and, if
applicable, what you have done so far (e.g. link to your work).
Regards.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
Try triggering /hasLayout/[1] on your *a*'s. One of the easiest ways
to do so is by setting the MS-only property 'zoom' (i.e. zoom:1) --if
you care about your code being valid, then don't use this property.
[1]http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html
vincent pollard wrote:
hi!
was defined by the
structure alone. They cannot simply take it away now, and that is called
/backward compatibility/.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
: collapse;
}
th,
td {
padding: 2px;
}
In IE, though, cellspacing has priority over border-collapse /
border-spacing (so don't use it).
Rafael
Ref.: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/tables.html#borders
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
Michael Leibson wrote:
Hi,
I just had my first look at what IE7 does to my website, via a BrowserCam.com
screencapture. The first thing I noticed is that the border to my homepage
'container' div is rendered as black, rather than as 30% black (#AAA9A9). Is
this the result of an IE7
sites being globally
available... this means that writing down email addresses here is almost
as good as putting them in some random forum (spam-wise).
Rafael.
P.S. Yes, I think the image you sent me is the only one where you see
that darker border.
Michael Leibson wrote:
- Original
Michael D Schleif wrote:
http://www.mdsfreedom.com/sellers.aspx
background-position: left;
means the same as
background-position: left center;
if you want it to be at a specific position you must tell it so; i.e.
background-position: 0 0.6ex;
I didn't find any explicit line-height
of thinking regarding our
present and (possible) future in Web dev.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http
that the content is
the same. Was this some kind of typo or there's a reason behind it?
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
Maybe this...
http://www.themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2005/08/29/
Rafael.
Robert James wrote:
Can anyone guide me with this?
If the question isn't clear, please let me know what needs to be added.
If this is simply impossible, could someone please let me know?
On 11/18/07
to be a programmer or a designer.
So... your issue is not CSS-related, so please make sure to send
your inquiries to the right people. As a hint: check what do you see on
each browser when you visit http://www.cpmac.com/indexcss.php (this is
the CSS code that that browser is seeing).
Rafael
Mona seems to be having some issues with the mails sent to the list
so now I'm trying my luck. I apologize if you end up getting 3 emails
that were meant to be just one :)
-- Forwarded message --
You can find a link to the problem in this link you will find the
menu
Hi,
I've come with a problem I saw once before, but didn't matter until
now. The issue is that IE (surprising, I know) gets rid of the vignettes
of floating list-items. I'd come across this behavior before but it
hadn't matter because I usually get rid of them anyway, but not this
you a small problem if the image's column width is a little smaller
than your actual columns.
Regards,
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
.
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http
Ian Bethune wrote:
I have added a background color to my sidebar on my blog Sox Dawgs,
http://soxanddawgs.com
I would like the sidebar color to extend to the bottom of each page and not
lengthen it any more than the longest sidebar unless the content is that
long.
I have read the how to
Jeralyn Merideth wrote:
I'm sorry! I sent this a couple days ago without a link. My bad. You guys
helped me on another problem with this same menu and I got that under
control, but now I can't seem to make it look right in FF. IE7 looks like
it's supposed to but in FF it's too high and not
Jeralyn Merideth wrote:
Rafael,
Thank you for your advice. However, I'm a little confused. Here is the
code for my body:
body#navon_home #navbar li#home a {
background: #fff url(../img/navon.jpg) repeat-x;
color: #fff;
}
body {
text-align: center;
background: url
Jeralyn Merideth wrote:
Yes, it did! Thanks. I *did* change the font-size in the code and not
in the browser lol. And, I added the zeroed margin and padding to the
body, took out the top property on the topmast, but now both IE and
Firefox is shoving down the menu into the masthead. Adding
David Laakso wrote:
Stuck.
In the top right column of this page [1] there is a slideshow.
In a javascript /disabled/ browser, the slides breaks right.
What to do?
[1] http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/un/
What about a different approach? In the case of this kind of JS
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
[...] I haven't found a way to
extract an image's real dimensions and use that as part of the
expression to smoothen things out.
You can get the size once the image has loaded. I'll make a couple
of tries and let you know if I could get anything useful.
Leah Maclean wrote:
I'm in the situation of wanting to stay true CSS and accessibility standards
by separating content and structure but am in a situation where I have an
anchor (a:link) but want to replace the standard text based link with an
image for those browsers/ that will see the image.
No luck. I couldn't get the behavior you mention.
If the footer actually disappears it may be the peekaboo bug, search
the archive google a little (position is everything) to find what
triggers it and its workarounds.
Ross Hulford wrote:
Hi,
My footer disapears in IE6. It seems to
Hans Lodder wrote:
Our specific questions:
- we do not have IE6; how does it look (can you install IE6 separate
from IE7?)
Yes, check this page
http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roger Keays wrote:
Hi all,
Here are some thoughts from my blog @
http://www.sunburnt.com.au/publications/design/horizontal-vs-vertical-menus
[...]
* Being evenly distributed across the page, they create balance
which makes you feel good :)
* They make better use of space as
Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
Hello,
This is my first post, a short intro: b. in South Africa, 37,
background engineering, working as atmospheric science researcher in
Tokyo, interests in LaTeX, web design, and document archiving and
long-term compatibility. Using Debian and Ubuntu GNU/linux
Alan Gresley wrote:
I have been following this thread with particular interest but staying in the
background while it bounded in and out of holy war territory. Keyboard
Accessibility with CSS is possible by using the :focus pseudo selector but at
this time, only Firefox and Mozilla (maybe
Well, the good news is that a margin seems to work just fine, so if
you add 'id=contact' to that image, and the next CSS it should be
positioned more or less where you want it...
#contact {
margin-right: 10px;
margin-top: -10px;
}
Now the bad news... yes, IE. There is a
Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
[...] exchanging video clips of sites as we worked, and
showing off the IE7 zoom. Very impressive indeed. I haven't updated
Opera but will do so.
Not sure if this is what you mean, but... unless you have a really
old version of Opera, it already has the zooming
I forgot to mention: the text is a copy / paste from your sample,
meaning that Buttercuup isn't something I made up, but a typo on your
version :)
Regards
Kathryn Crutcher wrote:
I recently asked about how to resolve having both a gradient background and
a background image. It is now
What you're looking for is
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#specificity
You can see that in 2.1 they included the 'style' attribute and give it
a specificity of 1000 (highest)
Alex Dunae wrote:
Hello all - I'm writing a CSS parser and have come up against a bit of
confusion
I recall something like this was mentioned not long ago, check the
archives...
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/?search=image+caption
first (actually, last) entry:
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/84117?highlight=image+caption
ScriptInstallation.in
I promised you before.
Regards,
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
Christian Heilmann wrote:
I've heard the request for pure CSS drop-down menus quite a lot, and
rarely see people getting told what they should about how *bad* they
are.
Cause people don't search archives?
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/78948
LOL. I agree, we
I changed my mind. I just read this article and I don't find it
useful. I think it lacks in-depth knowledge or he simply didn't took the
best approach for this topic.
I don't think he's wrong (solely in the point that hybrid menus are
better), but anyone with some knowledge could think
Kathryn Crutcher wrote:
I recently asked about how to resolve having both a gradient background and
a background image. It is now close to what I want but not there yet.
http://www.grandconnections.com/buttercup/index.htm and
http://www.grandconnections.com/buttercup/ApplicationStyle.css
It's because of the child's (or sub-item's parent) box. They
probably thought on give it some margin to make it safer and easier to
select, meaning you can go a little out of the item's box and the menu
won't disappear, so the issue you describe is caused by their top margin.
Hope that
I think this is yet another religious topic. Accessibility on most
JS menus (actually all I've seen so far) is inexistent, some of them are
so poorly done than they even throw an error on this or that browser and
the whole menu stops working. If you ask Joe Clark about his opinion...
maybe
Hi everyone,
with the past menu topics I remembered about a couple of issues I
was dealing with not too much ago.
I have this menu[1], and although it works as expected in most
browsers (IE 6 wasn't fully considered), I have two issues with which
I'd like to ask you for help:
a) I
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Rafael wrote:
I have this menu[1], and although it works as expected in most
browsers (IE 6 wasn't fully considered), I have two issues with which
I'd like to ask you for help:
a) I was trying to add keyboard support (without JS) but I can't find
a way to keep
You could check at this page
http://www.webdevout.net/css-hacks#in_css-selectors
Micky Hulse wrote:
I would prefer to use a filter for the latest version of Opera that will
be a good long-term fix. Basically, Opera gives a few extra pixels of
top-padding, on a form input, that I would
I guess you're talking about outline.
Bruce Gilbert wrote:
I remember reading somewhere about CSS you can add, so that links
won't get the dotted border around them when you click on the links ,
but I cannot remember what it is. Can anyone refresh my memory? This
may be just a Firefox
I don't quite get why this thread degenerated on this. This is just
syntax, there are alternatives, and it's already a standard (i.e. it
won't change), so what's the point?
If you ask me, I don't know the reasoning behind this order, they
could as well use the common (x, y) way, but
It's an interesting idea... it's like userstyles.org but without the
requirement of the Stylish extension (AFAIK only Fx). But there's
something I don't quite understand, how would you apply those styles?
If you want that to be browser-independent the only way I see is for
the site to
?
BTW, I like the Stylish idea better than CSS Fly, but that's just a
matter of taste :) --and what browser you use.
Regards,
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
As far as I've seen, this isn't possible (with CSS alone). The most
common way to achieve something similar is by using different background
colors, which I believe is done like this...
http://dev.rsalazar.name/css.d/ol-enum.html
Now, I found a minor issue with the typical approach
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
ps - don't ask me to read the text of your navigation, it is sooo small.
Yep, it's tiny AND it gets red over blue (I really suggest you to
change colors, maybe yellowish over blue) --assuming you're using a
bigger text, otherwise, it wouldn't matter much
You're CSS works correctly even in IE 7. What I would recommend you
is to temporary use the JS version on all browsers (i.e. commenting out
the li:hover in the CSS and the conditional comments in the HTML).
Your problems seem to be mainly two:
a) You have an extra margin on your IE 6
You're CSS works correctly even in IE 7. What I would recommend you
is to temporary use the JS version on all browsers (i.e. commenting out
the li:hover in the CSS and the conditional comments in the HTML).
Your problems seem to be mainly two:
a) You have an extra margin on your IE 6
There's a problem with your IE(s). I can resize the font both in IE
6 7 (Win XP Pro 64).
Jehangir Larry wrote:
I have a test page at:
http://www.jehangirlarry.com/test.php
I am unable to reduce the font size in any version of IE.
FF/Opera are OK.
Many thanks.
--
Jehangir Larry
There's a problem with your IE(s). I can resize the font both in IE
6 7 (Win XP Pro 64).
Jehangir Larry wrote:
I have a test page at:
http://www.jehangirlarry.com/test.php
I am unable to reduce the font size in any version of IE.
FF/Opera are OK.
Many thanks.
--
Jehangir Larry
Looking the same here (didn't bother to count the pixels, though)...
M/O/S + IE 6 7, Win XP Pro 64
Jehangir Larry wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
I have a test page at:
http://www.jehangirlarry.com/test.php
I am unable to reduce the font size in any version
A link is really useful in these cases. If you can, strip down your
HTML CSS to simply things.
Barney Carroll wrote:
Hi all!
I'm building a site strongly based on established style guides, in which
all header elements have dotted bottom-borders that stretch (as you
would expect)
if you add a max-width: 100% to the parent...
not sure about IE, maybe width: 100%; height: auto ??
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
,
but as in back-end (server-scripts) kind of dynamic site. If you're
not using Java (which seems to be the case) then the problem is more
likely on the validator itself ---again, JS shouldn't be the case for
this problems.
Rafael.
Omitade Adediran wrote:
Well, it looks like I will be removing
Please, as a web surfer, I beg you... don't add animations / movies
that start by themselves AND have sounds on it ---let the users choose,
or at least provide an obvious way to disable / change the volume (and
*remember* what the user chose).
Thanks.
Omitade Adediran wrote:
Hi:
, it seems it's not a critical bug
(and basically new). You can vote for a fix, though :)
Rafael wrote:
There's usually a link somewhere to file a bug report. In this
case, if you click on feedback you'll be able to check the FAQ and a
list of reported problems (where I didn't find yours
to
actually support those technologies, and that takes time. Where's CSS 3
right now? I've only seen a couple of browsers starting to support tiny
bits of it yet, but they're working on that, and someday we will be able
to relay on it (right, M$? right?).
Just my 2¢,
Rafael.
P.S. Sorry
Hi,
I have a limited knowledge on the different bugs out there, so I
would like to know what problems would cause a more conservative
structure for this problem, such as
http://dev.rsalazar.name/css.d/report.html
I just did it as an exercise (so I started from scratch), but it
validated, it's broken XHTML?
Personally, it's all I do, validated as XHTML Strict (after all, that's
why I'm writing).
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
On 7 Sep 2007, at 16:44, Rafael wrote:
# XHTML *does* promote more separation of content and presentation that
HTML does, since it doesn't allow most of the presentational attributes
anymore (e.g align) and some of the presentation tags (e.g. font).
HTML 4.01 Strict
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Well, you can't combine keywords with anything that
isn't, i.e. 'top
5%' or 'top 4px' are invalid (IIRC), and the keywords are correctly
interpreted because they are mutually exclusive (except for center,
but it doesn't matter in which order center center is
You don't say anything more and so I don't know how much do you know
of accessibility so far, but allow me to tell you that accessibility
goes far beyond the font size, there are problems most people don't even
imagine. By the way, I recommend you to use XHTML, as it will be easier
to
The only problem I see on that is when you change into unit values,
since they are interpreted as (x, y), other than that it should work
('center center' has no problem with that). Still, I think you should
specify the position in their general order.
Just my 2c.
Micky Hulse wrote:
Micky Hulse wrote:
I also had an excellent off-list reply:
[[
If at least one value is not a keyword, then the first value represents
the horizontal position and the second represents the vertical position.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/colors.html#propdef-background-position
In other words,
doesn't provide a reasonable
amount of window-width for it to scale on when subjected to font resizing.
Again, that's interesting, I also use em/ex sized layouts but I
never though of limiting the max-width to the window size. You make a
very good point here, thanks.
Rafael
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Rafael wrote:
By the way, I recommend you to use XHTML, as it will be easier to
parse for any software.
IE doesn't understand XHTML at all, and won't parse it unless we serve
it as broken HTML - or convert it into proper HTML.
Actually, it seems just the doctype
Check this, it may help you...
http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/02/08/unitless-line-heights/
trevor bayliss wrote:
What is line-height: 2; what value is interpreted by the browser? An em value
or px? Sorry about this newbie question, thanks for input
#footer p {
font-size :
Are you able to get this behavior in other machines and/or
platforms? I'm using Fx 2.0.0.6 / WinXP 64 and didn't see the problem
you describe, before and after the refresh it was always showed below
and at the right of the image.
Brian Walk wrote:
Strange thing happening in Firefox. Load
Maybe looking for css dropdown menu in Google (without the quotes
would be more effective). When you're at it, check ALA's Suckerfish
Dropdowns.
JGardner wrote:
Hello all,
I am wanting to learn how to do a css horizontal menu which has a 2nd level
nav bar. I have tried to do a Google
If I recall correctly, this is an old issue, and the reason why
there were web-safe colors. Basically, it was said that different
software may threat images differently because of inexact colors
and/or different platforms --I don't recall the exact reason, though.
Do you have the image
to
'transparent' (without the quotes)
· 'url' is an actual keyword, and the path should not be between quotes
· reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS1#background
Rafael.
David Merchant wrote:
I am trying to place the file cabinet image in the bottom right hand
corner of a div. I've searched wiki
on the (top
side of the) container, and that's what I did, sorry I can't help you
more than this. Anyone else?
Rafael.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css
Interesting... I don't know why (I didn't find anything on the spec) but it
seems you need to specify the height property. It also seems that pretty
much any value works.
On 8/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use min-height in FF, which is supposed to support the
: none;
padding-left: 50px;
padding-top: 1px;
padding-down: 1px;
padding-right: 3px;
border: none;
background: transparent url(login_userbox.gif) no-repeat;
_background: transparent url(login_userbox.gif) no-repeat fixed;
}
--
Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
# Grupo Cena
) no-repeat fixed;
}
--
Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
# Grupo Cena Digital
# (16) 9229-8928
# www.cenadigital.com.br
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css
be and is the spec really
this unspecific about this issue?
Regards,
Rafael
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ
you want.
Barney wrote:
I think what Rafael wants is for the object to be fixed compared to the
viewport, but for its initial position to be determined in relation to
its containing element, which could vary.
I'm afraid you will need a combination of javascript and CSS for this,
where
can use:
http://alistapart.com/articles/css3multicolumn
Rafael
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http
of the thumbs' container (ul#thumbarray). And it stays
there upon scrolling. Just like in PPK's site.
I'm interested in your opinions. Cheers,
Rafael
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo