To compress PNG images, I highly suggest:
http://tinypng.com
I used it on this site to reduce the size of the flavor images (scroll down
to view):
http://villadolcegelato.com/gelato-and-sorbetto-flavors
Ron Richardson
Website Design & Development
On 09/19/2015 10:12 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
Anyone have any image compression suggestions; there is one I use but
it only took a 210kb image to around 100kb. I'm hoping to squeeze
that 210kb image to around atleast 75kb without sacrificing too much
quality. I've tried a few thus far,
My images are at 72dpi; would it make a difference ?
GJim wrote:
On 09/20/2015 12:07 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
What exactly does the 'Set DPI function' do; if you don't mind me
asking ?
Basically, it sets the resolution, in 'Dots Per Inch', or the image.
For most web-page uses, 72 DPI
What exactly does the 'Set DPI function' do; if you don't mind me asking ?
GJim wrote:
On 09/19/2015 10:12 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
Anyone have any image compression suggestions; there is one I use but
it only took a 210kb image to around 100kb. I'm hoping to squeeze
that 210kb image
Export As is the same as save for web. PNG, especially transparent PNG
won't compress too drastic when using save for web, from my experiences.
ImgOptim & TriImage are not for PC.
Tom Livingston wrote:
I suggest starting with Save For Web, using the setting to get the
image as small as
I know, I have numerous images I have to compression extremely low; I
have to hunt for the options :-(
Russ McMullin wrote:
It really depends on the image. If it’s a photograph, PNG is not the way I
would choose to save it. It’s just my opinion, but 75kb seems pretty large for
a mobile
I suggest starting with Save For Web, using the setting to get the image as
small as possible in weight. Then use one of the compression tools
mentioned to compress even further.
ImgOptim will compress png as well as jpg.
On Sunday, September 20, 2015, Crest Christopher
> On 09/19/2015 10:12 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
>> Anyone have any image compression suggestions; there is one I use but it
>> only took a 210kb image to around 100kb. I'm hoping to squeeze that 210kb
>> image to around atleast 75kb without sacrificing too much quality. I've
>> tried a
ImageOptim is only for Macs !
Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Just set the image at the size it needs to be with resolution at 72DPI and
ImageOptim will compress it pretty good. You can also compress more than once
and it takes a little more off. I wouldn't reduce with another program then
this one.
Just set the image at the size it needs to be with resolution at 72DPI and
ImageOptim will compress it pretty good. You can also compress more than once
and it takes a little more off. I wouldn't reduce with another program then
this one. First ImageOptim then photoshop save as.
That's my
Ok, but the same (I would say) holds true to any image compression utility.
Use the program that is made to compress the image first using the full(est)
resolution,
then take that reduced file and see if photoshop can reduce more without
mudding the image.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
It really depends on the image. If it’s a photograph, PNG is not the way I
would choose to save it. It’s just my opinion, but 75kb seems pretty large for
a mobile image.
Russ
On Sep 20, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Crest Christopher
wrote:
> As well my images are PNG. I
On 09/20/2015 12:07 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
What exactly does the 'Set DPI function' do; if you don't mind me
asking ?
Basically, it sets the resolution, in 'Dots Per Inch', or the image.
For most web-page uses, 72 DPI is sufficient. You can use a
'thumb-nail' image, of small size or
As well my images are PNG. I don't use the legacy Save for Web; I
prefer Export As; formally Export Assets in Photoshop, which doesn't
offer any control for compression for PNG images.
Blurring parts of an image, it can be beneficial; not for mobile, where
the screen is small to begin with.
ImageOptim for Mac. Not sure if it's available for PC.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Sep 19, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Crest Christopher
wrote:
> Anyone have any image compression suggestions; there is one I use but it only
> took a
Anyone have any image compression suggestions; there is one I use but it
only took a 210kb image to around 100kb. I'm hoping to squeeze that
210kb image to around atleast 75kb without sacrificing too much
quality. I've tried a few thus far, some are extremely poor at
compression, others
16 matches
Mail list logo