Kathy Wheeler wrote:
On 09/03/2008, at 6:40 AM, Karl Hardisty wrote:
A comparison of usage before and
after is generally a good idea. If a site design changes, and
suddenly a certain type of browser/platform combination drops off
markedly, there's probably a good reason.
However it may
On 09/03/2008, at 6:40 AM, Karl Hardisty wrote:
A comparison of usage before and
after is generally a good idea. If a site design changes, and
suddenly a certain type of browser/platform combination drops off
markedly, there's probably a good reason.
However it may also pay to check
It's all about the user data, baby! We've got no people using anything
lower than IE6, so I test IE6, IE7, Firefox, Safari, Opera, and that's about
it. However, I'd really like to know how to test for those several WebTV
users we have visit our site every month (I didn't even know it still
On 7/03/2008, at 8:29 AM, david wrote:
Karl Hardisty wrote:
On 6/03/2008, at 7:03 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less
than IE6.
And if they do, well, it's just time for an
Rob Emenecker wrote:
And remember this about logs: If you design a site that
doesn't work in browser X, after awhile, you won't have
anyone using browser X visit your site *because your site
doesn't work.* Then you'll pat yourselves on the back
and say, See - no one uses browser X. ;-)
I agree with everything your saying David.
I was simply having one of those crap-tacular days and was trying to inject
some witty sarcasm into the thread.
It wasn't meant as a 'poo poo, why do you worry about that old text
browser?' comment. The exact opposite is true, we should worry about it
On 3/6/08, Mark Story [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hernly, Lee wrote:
Netscape 4.X here...
When testing with an older browser such as netscape 4.x are you looking
for identical results to current browsers. Or just 'good enough' results?
identical is impossible with Netscape 4. In
Mark Story wrote:
So I just wanted to get an idea of what the oldest
browser you are currently testing for is?
Lynx.
And how are you targetting
them? Hacks, conditional comments, other techniques?
None needed.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
Karl Hardisty wrote:
On 6/03/2008, at 7:03 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less
than IE6.
And if they do, well, it's just time for an upgrade. I'm not jumping
through
And remember this about logs: If you design a site that
doesn't work in browser X, after awhile, you won't have
anyone using browser X visit your site *because your site
doesn't work.* Then you'll pat yourselves on the back
and say, See - no one uses browser X. ;-)
... says the
As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less than IE6.
And if they do, well, it's just time for an upgrade. I'm not jumping through
that many hoops to accommodate so few IE 5 users.
And I make liberal use of
Netscape 4.X here...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Story
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:36 PM
To: 'CSS'
Subject: [css-d] Oldest Browser Currently Testing for
It seems that my perception of in the wild browsers was a bit
On 6/03/2008, at 7:03 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
As far as IE goes, I test for IE6 and IE7, nothing lower.
My data shows no visitors ever coming to my sites with anything less
than IE6.
And if they do, well, it's just time for an upgrade. I'm not jumping
through
that many hoops to accommodate
I test for SIMILAR results on Firefox2, ie6, and ie7 on pc along with
safari on the mac and Konq on linux
I test for 'acceptible' for ie5.5 on pc, opera, and ie5.5 on the mac
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virtualization is great for this sort of thing; however, specifically
what I do is.
Opera and Netscape
The browsers allow for multiple versions coexisting on the same machine.
Firefox
I use a virtualization program for different older browser; however,
there are tips online for getting two
I test for SIMILAR results on Firefox2, ie6, and ie7 on pc along
with safari on the mac and Konq on linux
I test for 'acceptible' for ie5.5 on pc, opera, and ie5.5 on the mac
Ditto here. Basic content can be viewed testing for anything less than
IE6, FF2, Safari 1.2, or Konquerer (can't
Hernly, Lee wrote:
Netscape 4.X here...
When testing with an older browser such as netscape 4.x are you looking
for identical results to current browsers. Or just 'good enough' results?
-Mark
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
17 matches
Mail list logo
