Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with
closing a button tag. I closed it like this:
button type=submit title=Search class=searchbutton /
which completely(!) messed up the page.
Now it's closed this way button type=submit title=Search
class=searchbutton /button
On 11/09/2013 7:01 PM, Albert van der Veen wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with
closing a button tag. I closed it like this:
button type=submit title=Search class=searchbutton /
which completely(!) messed up the page.
Now it's closed this way button
David,
I really don't see how the three HTML errors would case his problem. And, you
might want to check the CSS before running a validation. He's using CSS3 that
validation does not appear to have been run under CSS3 but rather CSS2.1 making
the error irrelevant. And, even if they were the only
Albert,
I'm not seeing your problem. Have your fixed it?
On September 3, 2013 at 8:20 AM Albert van der Veen albert.lijs...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you
can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:20:01 +0200, Albert van der Veen wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you
| can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone
| see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems
Can you please view this website and give me your comments?
Especially from technical point of view.
Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever?
I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different
browsers and platforms.
http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl
If you wish to
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Erik Visser e...@erikvisser.net wrote:
I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different
browsers and platforms.
http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl
Thank you, Erik Visser
The pages in the site seem to perform as expected in a Windows
in the right place? Thank-you
very much, Kind Regards, Ed
- Original Message -
From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com
To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com
Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check
- Original Message -
From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com
To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com
Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please
Well, according to your source code
...@gmail.com
To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com
Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please
Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo
there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look
Ed Goodson wrote:
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html
I do have an issue on IE though at the moment, the text string: Header2 and
the text below is not showing within the confines of the grey background
image. How can I make sure that this shows in the
Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo
there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look like the image is on the server.
Did you upload the images folder to the server? Is the logo in the
images folder?
Theresa
On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Norman Fournier wrote:
Safari
Hi all,
Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to
me on ff
The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict.
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html;
Seems to look the same for me in FF and IE 6 on windows.
Posted screen shot here for IE6 for you:
What kind of things are you looking for us to find?
On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Ed Goodson wrote:
Hi all,
Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks
fine to me on ff
The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict.
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Hi guys,
So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox
IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other
browsers and resolutions.
http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html
Thanks very much,
Lorraine
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:18 PM, David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com
wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
Lorraine,
Getting your page functional in IE 6/7 required hacking it from here to
Havana. And it still was not right. If you need to keep your current markup,
then someone else on the
David Laakso wrote:
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Hi David,
Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my
calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if
it's better now:
http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html
thanks very much
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Lorraine Barte
Nepomucenowebmistr...@splashscreen.com wrote:
So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox
IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other
browsers and resolutions.
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Thanks for your reply, David- although I do admit I am confused by
some of it... what are rivers? I'd appreciate any ideas you might
have on what I've done wrong in my CSS as well... thanks again :)
Lorraine
Think of the text-block as a piece of fine
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Hi David,
Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my
calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if
it's better now:
http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html
thanks very much
Lorraine
For a lot of
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the
missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be
that neither of the more important content images in the right column,
Ib Jensen wrote:
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the
missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be
that neither of the more important content
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the CSS
file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 conditional comment. It will
Ib Jensen wrote:
Hi
Link: http://ikjensen.dk
Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3)
Locally known issues:
IE6 dont show my link-icons
IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3.
At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?:
IE6: Arghhh
The template _are_ not made for IE6!
Chris Blake wrote:
And 'stop the presses' is wrong, 'press' is plural.
Uhh, not always, and certainly not when used as Jody is using it: as
part of the age old saying: Stop the presses. This goes way back to
the days of the printing press and refers literally to stopping the
printing presses
wow, thank you for the screen shot. I will adjust.
On May 17, 2009, at 9:06 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right
as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I
open the pages in
Hi Chris
Actually, as Bill points out, stop the presses is correct in this
sense. It refers to when a late breaking important news story would
come in to a newspaper after the edition was already on the printing
press. They'd stop the printing presses to update.
The image at the bottom is
On May 17, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and
the navbar position
On 19/05/2009, at 3:57 AM, Jody Levinson wrote:
The image at the bottom is just a plain old transparent gif with a
black mask. I'm not wild about how the mask shows over a light
background, but no mask leaves jaggedy edges on the hands. It's a
tradeoff.
The way around this is to save the
On 2009/05/17 19:30 (GMT-0700) Jody Levinson composed:
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and
the navbar position
Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and
the navbar position overlaps the top of the
On 18/05/2009, at 12:06 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open
the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right
Michael Beaudoin a écrit :
I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a
manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some
issues.
What I can see off the bat...
- In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox
IE)
This
Subject: [css-d] Site check please...
I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a
manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some
issues.
What I can see off the bat...
- In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox
IE)
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
11/13/2008
I'd appreciate a check of these four pages,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetphotogallery.html.
Peter
The height issue is definitely fixed in IE6.
The entity issue is only an issue in the address line, but is not an
issue in the times that the restaurant is open, yet uses some of the
same bullets. Can you use the same coding for the bullets in the
address line that you use in the times that the
, at 3:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:30:07 +0100
From: Gunlaug S?rtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2
To: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org, David Laakso
The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image
on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is cut so
only the bottom half shows.
It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height.
Nancy
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:25 PM, David Laakso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Banquet menu and policy are linked wrong on this page or missing
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquet.html
Kelly Sigethy - Frynge.com
Web Design - Hosting - Advertising
http://www.frynge.com
1-403-251-9486 (Calgary)
1-866-331-9684 (Toll Free - Canada and the USA)
+44 (0)8717 206
Nancy Johnson wrote:
The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image
on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is cut so
only the bottom half shows.
It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height.
Nancy
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
You could try that. I have done the same thing and it works.
Nancy
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, David Laakso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nancy Johnson wrote:
The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image
on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is
- Original Message -
From: David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html
http://www.fatpawdesign.com
1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large gap
you mention in any of my XP or Mac OS X 10.4.11
David Laakso wrote:
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html
http://www.fatpawdesign.com
1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large
gap you mention in any of
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
10/25/2008
Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new Cedar Lake
Inn index page and one
interior page here,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No
breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know
if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working.
Ok in IE6.
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
10/06/2008
Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No
breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know
if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working.
Peter
O.K. Mac OS X 10.4.11 Opera,
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/DAC/DACproducts.html
All: Thanks for the look-see and feed-back.
Georg: I think I have the transparent borders issue fixed. Would you
please make another quick check?
Borders ok. IE6 need a little bit more help though.
1: There's the
Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page
is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers.
http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html
It does not render correctly in IE6 - the Gray areas (designed by and
other) one floats all the way to the left and the other all the way
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:39:46 +0800, WEZ! wrote:
Heya all,
Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is
rendering
without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html
I've ran it through all the modern browsers on my work Mac and if anyone
Professional Web Pages - Information wrote:
Dear David,
Thank you for your feedback - my apologies for a late response.
What is the suggestion/recommendation/community view for font
formatting with CSS?
Regards
PWP
Would you please provide feedback for the website
Professional Web Pages - Information wrote:
Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au/
Thank you.
Regards
PWP
Is the blue block offset 24px on the left intentional? Some folks may
have trouble with the tiny frozen fonts in IE. And not everyone will
It looks OK to me, if a little slow to load images, but that could just be the
server.
What else did you want to know?
Regards,
Alan.
www.theatreorgans.co.uk
www.virtualtheatreorgans.com
Admin: ConnArtistes, UKShopsmiths, 2nd Touch A-P groups
Shopsmith 520 + bits
Flatulus Antiquitus
on the Order, FAQ and Contact US pages the leftcolumn-two div
contains a child div called post which has some padding. This
shifts all content down and across, not sure if this is intentional.
lister
2008/6/3 Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Raven
Hi all,
May I request a site check please? It all looks okay
on my own Mac
and PC
browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you
might see that I
don't:
http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/
Thanks very much!
Lorraine
Hi Lorraine:
I'm seeing two small issues in IE5/Mac. On the
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Raven Gildea wrote:
Hi all,
May I request a site check please? It all looks okay
on my own Mac
and PC
browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you
might see that I
don't:
http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/
Thanks very much!
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Hi all,
May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC
browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't:
http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/
Thanks very much!
Lorraine
Looked fine to me in Mac
Hi all,
May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC
browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't:
http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/
Thanks very much!
Lorraine
Everything works for me in Windows IE6 and Firefox. Only thing -
On Thu, 29 May 2008 12:10:39 -0400, David Laakso wrote:
re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html
One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove the
menu to the
left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6 does not support
min/max).
[...]
Please see:
Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley:
Could someone please check just the home page for me at:
http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html
Sorry to reply to myself, but I've sorted it. It *was* a screen-size
thing. I checked it out on my wife's eee PC. I've now given the photo
a width of 80% and
Ysgrifennodd Konstantin Kuchugurin:
Piter try this
p
div style=position:relative;float:left;margin:10px 10px 0px
0px;width:Your_Pic_Width_Size_px;height:Your_Pic_Height_Size_px;img
src=image_folder/Your_Image.jpg alt= //div
Some text ... Much more text... :)
/p
This will be
Peter Bradley wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley:
http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html
If anyone has any comments on the site, though, I'd be very pleased to
get any feedback. I'm a bit of a newbie to this CSS stuff, so any
suggestions would be very gratefully received.
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso:
Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi.
Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of
terminology I've missed, I think.
Pixel font-sizes are not very user friendly.
Yes, you're absolutely right. I hadn't realised I'd done that. Must
Peter Bradley wrote:
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso:
Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi.
Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of
terminology I've missed, I think.
re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html
Let's just say, for the sake of
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso:
Let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that the length of the
lines of primary content text (measure) may be a little long for
those who view the page at screen resolution 1280 and higher
(particularly in laptops).
Ah. OK. Got you.
I agree, as well,
Peter Bradley wrote:
There are a couple of other things I've noticed, which someone might be
able to help with:
* Is there any way of stopping the navigation menu from wrapping when
the screen size gets smaller. I'd prefer horizontal scroll bars, if
it's possible
* In IE6, the menu
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso:
re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html
One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove
the menu to the left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6
does not support min/max). This will avoid the h-scroll bar. The menu
will
thanks for the feedback guys...
2008/5/27 David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rob freeman wrote:
nearly there,
please can you check this site for any obvious pitfalls...
http://www.nest-life.com/update/
thanks
No major issues that I could see in compliant browsers, or IE/6 IE/7. The
Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of
www.whitehouseinwestbend.com
http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css
http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css
Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always
welcome.
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of
www.whitehouseinwestbend.com
http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css
http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css
Peter
David:
Thanks. I set the margins to -2px; and
On 22/05/2008, at 12:39 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Karl Hardisty wrote:
http://mothership.co.nz/blog
All feedback greatly accepted.
Karl
It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl.
Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct.
Aside:
The title of the document does not seem to appear in the
Karl Hardisty wrote:
http://mothership.co.nz/blog
All feedback greatly accepted.
Karl
It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl.
Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct.
Aside:
The title of the document does not seem to appear in the text.
Font-scaling breaks the long word
Matthew Stoneback wrote:
IE6 IE7 issue: The main navigation area located in the upper left area has
spaces between the images I am using as links. This does not display this
way in any other browser (that I am aware of). They appear to be
approximately 2 to 3 pixels in height.
I may
In IE6 the layout is fine, but instead of a drop shadow behind the container
div, I see a solid gray border. You can see a screen shot here:
http://valeriewininger.com/css_list/ssCssZenGarden.jpg
Valerie
www.valeriewininger.com
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Alan K Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. I'm using a PNG file in the background and had
a .htc file call in the HTML which I removed, so now
the transparency doesn't show in IE6 - the .htc file
was causing it not to layout right. I will resort to
using a different image file format for the reasons
mentioned as well as the fact,
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
http://e7flux.com/csszengarden/chaoticspring.html
You have height:1%; on the below selector. You may (?) want to feed
that only to IE/6, as compliant browsers might do better without it at
+2 font-scaling.
.p5 {
height: 1%;
}
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
I'd appreciate someone(s) looking at www.bildasfriesslakepub.com in IE6 and
IE7, specifically at the Join Our Mailing List box at the top...]
TIA and Cheers,
Peter
Looks fine to me at text-size largest in IE/6 7, Peter.
Aside: I'd hold the your current
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] site check please
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
I'd appreciate someone(s) looking at www.bildasfriesslakepub.com in IE6
and IE7, specifically at the Join Our Mailing List box at the top...]
TIA and Cheers,
Peter
David wrote:
Looks
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Carolyn Rosner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm wondering what's up with my page: http://test.nprb.org/new/index.htm
Specifically, the three buttons in upper right corner. They are a
Library item, in their own div that's set to float: right. The
It looks right in IE7 and Firefox 2. In IE6 where the light blue starts to
go back to dk blue there is a distinct line where the darker blue starts.
If that makes sense. You might check out Browsershots too--
http://browsershots.org/
Valerie
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Jack Timmons [EMAIL
Matthew Stoneback wrote:
In IE 6 - The right column gets pushed down and under the left column in the
main content area. The orange navigation bar is too far right. The green
header backgrounds are too tall in the main content area.
Adding display: inline; to selector #messageText
Matthew Stoneback wrote:
I have never seen this site on a Mac, can someone out
there hook me up with any issues.
http://www.eddysound.com/rrc/index_help.html
Matt Stoneback
In Mac OS X 10.4.11
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12)
Gecko/20080201
Sébastien FICHOT wrote:
I've released a website for SQL makers. Can someone check this
website please ? www.guss.fr
It's aways interesting to have more eyes on things that can broke
accessibility or reliability between platforms and way-of-thinking.
I *think* there are a few too many
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:33:50 +0200, Bill Stemp wrote:
http://www.pielows.co.za/
I'm particularly interested in how one section of the site appears in IE6 (or
before).
This section is accessed with the menu link '_*Cape Tours*_' and has a
CSS-driven menu
on the left. I think that this
Bill,
The menu items don't change background color in IE6. The text color does
change. Also, the pop-out for 'Tour Itineraries' is not popping out in IE6.
Not sure of the cause, however.
Jim
On Feb 7, 2008 5:33 AM, Bill Stemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pielows.co.za/
I'm
Since building the site, I've upgraded my IE from 6 to 7. I now have to
use 'multipleIEs'
(http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/multiIE.html) to check in
previous versions. When the site was first uploaded, it worked fine in
IE6 (with the exception of the orange menu background being a
Sandy wrote:
I am working on a web site, and I would be grateful if you could take
the time to look at a rough version of it, and let me know what you think.
http://cantoraccess.com/beta_sandy2/index.html
Any comments or suggestions are much appreciated!
Sandy
You may want check
Rob freeman wrote:
Hi everyone, I have worked a little site and was wondering if people
can have a look and check to see if its working ok.
I have checked this in Firefox 2.0 (Mac and PC), IE7(PC), Safari and
Opera. My only concern is IE6 which may be a pain. If there is a
problem in this
Jehangir Larry wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Re: www.arundixit.com
Firefox displays as intended.
IE6 and IE7 do not display header background.
Additionally, IE6 does not center content.s of #inner.
Appreciate advice/ suggestions for above.
Also, a general site check
David Laakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
Jehangir Larry wrote:
Re: www.arundixit.com
Firefox displays as intended.
IE6 and IE7 do not display header background.
Additionally, IE6 does not center content.s of #inner.
Appreciate advice/ suggestions for above.
Also, a
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
www.bildasfriesslakepub.com
Would appreciate a look-see in Opera (I'm in O9.24), as the nav bar
anchors aren't working right and occasionally disappear all together
on scrolling. Which bug and how to fix?
An old instability in Opera when trying to interpret the W3C
daniela froehlich wrote:
Dear All
On my site I am using Tanfa's CSS menu. Used it several times already and it
always worked fine.
Now on my latest website it does not seem to work properly in one of the IE.
Unfortunately I do not know which version and have no clue what could be
wrong.
Subject: Re: [css-d] site-check please, major ie6 issues
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
Probably too much 'hasLayout' for IE6' liking already :-)
IE6 seems to have serious stacking-problems, and there's too many
'stacking-correctors' in there too
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
Made change as recommended. Would appreciate another check.
Working just fin in IE6 (on w2k).
Can I just take out those particular 'position' declarations out all
together?
Yes, that _should_ automatically take it back
I checked IE6, it looks OK to me,same with opera.
Ernie :))
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Date: Fri, 30 Nov
2007 22:27:46 -0600 Subject: [css-d] site-check please, major ie6 issues
http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html Hello All: I'd appreciate
a
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
http://www.bildas.fatpawdesign.com/index.html
I'd appreciate a site check of above page. Seems well behaved except
in IE6, which is losing the floated green box in the left column, and
evidently the whole content of the right column. Something somewhere
probably
Looks like it breaks in IE6 win. See screen shot here:
http://www.jimdavis.org/test/ie6.jpg
You can see how you site will render in different browsers and os's for free
here:
http://browsershots.org/
Jim
On Nov 25, 2007 10:34 AM, Rob freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, I have
Looks, good, Some of the image boxes dropped a little down the page in
Safari on Windows xp for me! but in FireFox and IE7 all looks good!
Rob freeman wrote:
Hello everyone, I have been working on a little
site for some friends which I have just uploaded.
Could anyone please check the site in
David Laakso wrote:
Rob freeman wrote:
Hello everyone, I have been working on a little
site for some friends which I have just uploaded.
Could anyone please check the site in older browsers
For any problems (its not complete).
I have workied in OSX running firefox and safari.
Cory Shubert wrote:
http://www.nwaworldvacations.com
We tried to do a better job of CSS and moved into a more Web 2.0
vibe, at least that is what we were trying for. I am sure many will
lament our use of tables still, but some habits die hard. I am
curious to learn how we might have
1 - 100 of 386 matches
Mail list logo
