-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-02-03 11:28:45 EST, you write:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wants to be "free to discuss suspicions about anyone or any
group, it would be grand."
You are. What is your big revelation or suspicion you have to relate?
And what is the benefit?
Om
K
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/3/99 12:47:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I have neither revelations nor suspicions about Wes. I was, however,
interested in what others had to say on the subject.
Unfortunately, the process of expressing interest seems to
-Caveat Lector-
That's a pretty gross misrepresentation of the case and its issues. But
I'm not going to argue, realizing that to do so will get me kicked off
this list as surely as it got me kicked off Zundel's.
FWP.
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Kris Millegan wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
In a message
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Kris Millegan wrote:
Frank,
Please do not keep us informed of your personal affrontations. They are off-
topic and do not belong on this list. so keep it up or you can go whine about
ME on some other lists.
Don't worry boss. I'll tow the line...for
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-02-02 11:24:21 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Kris Millegan wrote:
Frank,
Please do not keep us informed of your personal affrontations. They are
off-
topic and do not belong on this list. so keep it up or you can go
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/2/99 12:03:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
In a message dated 99-02-02 11:24:21 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Kris Millegan wrote:
Frank,
Please do not keep us informed of your personal
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-02-02 14:53:02 EST, you write:
I might agree with this, at least in part, but it would depend upon what it
is you wanted to discuss. Let us say for the sake of argument that I am a
shill for the government and that my being an editor of CTRL enables me
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/2/99 4:35:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
To restate: it seems fair and germiane to discuss the possibility that
list owners or moderators might have an agenda as per their list control
behavior.
Well, I DO have an agenda. I
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-02-02 18:29:26 EST, you write:
Well, I DO have an agenda. I can't speak for anyone else but myself, but my
agenda is to enhance discussion, to keep rhetoric to a minimum, to get away
from personal attacks, to see more people posting their ideas and
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/2/99 7:56:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I'll try to make this as innocuous as I can..let me rephrase that to a
"sinister agenda" (though I suspect you knew exactly what I meant.)
If we could be free to discuss
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/30/99 1:52:50 PM, Franklin Wayne Poley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've made yourself a topic of discussion Wes. So I suggest you not
harass me again by whining to my ISP webmaster.
FWP.
Frank,
Please do not keep us informed of your personal
-Caveat Lector-
You've made yourself a topic of discussion Wes. So I suggest you not
harass me again by whining to my ISP webmaster.
FWP.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:30:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Franklin Wayne Poley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, January 30, 1999 4:51 PM
Subject: [CTRL] [mindcontrol] Re: Wes Thomas and the Need for Genetic
Improvement of the Plan... (fwd)
-Caveat Lector-
You've made yourself a topic of discussion Wes. So I suggest you not
harass me again
13 matches
Mail list logo
