-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Now let me ask you this, IF one were to NOT have a bank account, but otherwise
> carried on as per normal, ie; used FRN's, etc. . . would that be sufficient
> to be "unseen" by the IRS?
Usually it might be sufficient, but there i
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/22/99 6:52:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It obviously didn't happen in your case, but when I
> read Mercier's letter to Armon Condo the countless
> loose ends and endless contradictions found in all
> other Tax Protestor theori
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> How could the same principles apply if, as you admit, the constitution does
> not apply in tax cases, but does in civil and criminal court?
Look at it this way: the Bill of Rights does *not*
apply to corporations. Agreed?
Now consider: if the federa
-Caveat Lector-
See my comments interspersed below.
In a message dated 10/19/99 4:39:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I may be mistaken, but you seem to be getting 'a'
> point, while missing 'THE' point
>
> With a few exceptions, when the IRS terrocrats
> (terro
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm not offended in the least by your comments here. You have all but agreed
> with my basic premise, which is amply illustrated by the court cases which
> are cited in the FAQ, that is that the LAW and the CONSTITUTION do not matter
> a hill of bean
-Caveat Lector-
MHO, What one must do is that your "defense' should start at arrest and must
be brought up before arraignment. Quo Warranto, is your defense, with that
declared to the arresting officer and to the judge before arraignment,
hopefully in a written statement, but oral is enough at t
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/18/99 4:42:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> No offense Teo, but Dan Evans is a statist imp, and a
> wanna be shyster -- as anyone who ever subscribed to
> misc.taxes well knows -- it's saddening to see you post
> his swill on CTRL
-Caveat Lector-
From: TenebrousT
Subject: [CTRL] 300,000$ reward, bunk. . .
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 12:16:13 -0700
<http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg26403.html>
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Here is a list of topics from http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
No offense Teo, but Dan
-Caveat Lector-
My apologies to Linda Minor, for incorrectly identifying her (as Linda
Miller) in the previous post on this subject.
subject.
*
"The most merciful thing in the world
-Caveat Lector-
Here is a list of topics from http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
You'll see that the issues raised in the Tax Protester FAQ are some of the
same ones addressed in this reward notice. You must file a return with the
IRS, and the 5th amendment will not save you, since tax cour
10 matches
Mail list logo
