-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 3/7/2003 11:28:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, writes:
Kris,
Can you explain this further? I do not follow your thinking. The war is on.
The rift between US/Uk and the rest of the UN is real (would not be an issue
if the US agreed to share 21st century spoils
-Caveat Lector-
3/7/2003 2:44:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the war go forwards Bush loses, what we see is what is presented.
Bush has already lost. Resorting to violence on a domestic or international
level is imprudent. Even in the home, moderation and mediation is the
rule. Drunk
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 3/7/2003 1:24:48 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not wanting to seem to be disagreeable but I think he's realised that he's
shot his wad and HE (like SH) has little more to lose at this point.
According to Janis, he's now "free".
Opinions
-Caveat Lector-
3/7/2003 3:30:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Naw, watch him play it. His prayers are gonnna be answered and he will
show
resolve to the brink but his compassion and the answer of prayer
shall allow him to be magnanimous.
I see your point ... it's something like signing up
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 3/7/2003 1:41:47 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Caveat Lector-
3/7/2003 3:30:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Naw, watch him play it. His prayers are gonnna be answered and he will
show
resolve to the brink but his "compassion" and the
-Caveat Lector-
At 03:44 PM 3/7/03 , you wrote:
Kris may be onto something here.
No war?
And through his POLICY also he shall cause CRAFT to prosper in his
hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by PEACE shall
destroy many:
-Daniel 8:25
And that fits my position that Bush is a
