-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/1/01 12:51:31 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whatever it was, it's obvious that we, the public, were NOT meant to see
something until a certain point of time...for some reason we were
precluded from seeing the front of the house
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Samantha L. wrote:
Whatever it was, it's obvious that we, the public, were NOT meant to see
something until a certain point of time...for some reason we were
precluded from seeing the front of the house until shortly after this
mysterious garage door
-Caveat Lector-
On 1 Sep 01, at 1:44, Saba wrote:
I hope that old bitch is happy now - a man is dead who did nothing other
than say he was allegedly a Federal Marshall who trained dogs, and she
called and they said no they did not train dogs and went around the
neighborhood checking him out
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 8/31/01 8:51:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was absolutely no reason to have
burned this man to his death in this manner.
~Amelia~
You are absolutely correct. The fire could have been fought by the FD without
exposing themselves to gunfire. It
-Caveat Lector-
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Amelia wrote:
I watched this unfold on TV today, too, and was absolutely appalled
that there was NO ATTEMPT to extinguish the fire. Not even when
the garage was the only part of the house left.
At that stage the reporters were saying that the authorities
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Saba wrote:
A report was also given to media that this man wanted to give up but
only if they promised not to kill or hurt his dog - this statement was
made several times.
I didn't hear about him wanting to give up if they promised not to hurt
his dog (not
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Steve Wingate wrote:
I hope that old bitch is happy now - a man is dead who did nothing other
than say he was allegedly a Federal Marshall who trained dogs, and she
called and they said no they did not train dogs and went around the
neighborhood checking
-Caveat Lector-
On 1 Sep 01, at 11:16, Bill Howard wrote:
There was absolutely no reason to have
burned this man to his death in this manner.
~Amelia~
You are absolutely correct. The fire could have been fought by the FD without
exposing themselves to gunfire. It seems that if you
-Caveat Lector-
There was a woman interviewed on Tv telephone only - she stated the guy
attended block parties, etc., that we are a close knit family
here..she then said that she was suspicious of this man for he had
told her he was a Federal Marshalland into canine training.
A report
